Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01536-6
Yehai Jiang, Doudou Pu, Xuyang Zhang, Zhanli Ren, Nan Yu
{"title":"Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.","authors":"Yehai Jiang, Doudou Pu, Xuyang Zhang, Zhanli Ren, Nan Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01536-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences-spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and September 2022. All participants underwent both 3T MRI scanning, utilizing the radial VIBE sequence and spiral UTE sequence, as well as standard chest CT imaging. The CT and MRI examinations were conducted within a 7-day interval. Two radiologists assessed the image quality using a visual 5-point ordinal Likert scale, and pulmonary nodules identified on MRI were evaluated through comparison with CT as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients participated in this study, during which 82 pulmonary nodules were detected via CT imaging. The image quality scores for depicting pulmonary vasculature and airways using the spiral UTE sequence (4.61 ± 0.63; 4.76 ± 0.48) were significantly higher than those for the radial VIBE sequence (4.27 ± 0.87; 4.14 ± 0.82) (P < 0.05). However, for nodules smaller than 6 mm, the detection rate for the spiral UTE sequence (82.61%) was notably higher than that of the radial VIBE sequence (39.13%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the detection rate for ground-glass nodules was higher with the spiral UTE sequence (75.00%) compared to the radial VIBE sequence (17.86%) (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between radial VIBE and CT was 0.99 (P < 0.001), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between spiral UTE and CT was also 0.99 (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The spiral UTE sequence demonstrates superior capability in visualizing ground glass nodules, blood vessels, and airways. In cases where patients present with ground glass nodules, the spiral UTE sequence is the preferred choice. Conversely, when the nodules are solid or partially solid, it is advisable to opt for radial VIBE sequences that are time-efficient and exhibit fewer artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01536-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences-spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE).

Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and September 2022. All participants underwent both 3T MRI scanning, utilizing the radial VIBE sequence and spiral UTE sequence, as well as standard chest CT imaging. The CT and MRI examinations were conducted within a 7-day interval. Two radiologists assessed the image quality using a visual 5-point ordinal Likert scale, and pulmonary nodules identified on MRI were evaluated through comparison with CT as the reference standard.

Results: A total of 52 patients participated in this study, during which 82 pulmonary nodules were detected via CT imaging. The image quality scores for depicting pulmonary vasculature and airways using the spiral UTE sequence (4.61 ± 0.63; 4.76 ± 0.48) were significantly higher than those for the radial VIBE sequence (4.27 ± 0.87; 4.14 ± 0.82) (P < 0.05). However, for nodules smaller than 6 mm, the detection rate for the spiral UTE sequence (82.61%) was notably higher than that of the radial VIBE sequence (39.13%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the detection rate for ground-glass nodules was higher with the spiral UTE sequence (75.00%) compared to the radial VIBE sequence (17.86%) (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between radial VIBE and CT was 0.99 (P < 0.001), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between spiral UTE and CT was also 0.99 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The spiral UTE sequence demonstrates superior capability in visualizing ground glass nodules, blood vessels, and airways. In cases where patients present with ground glass nodules, the spiral UTE sequence is the preferred choice. Conversely, when the nodules are solid or partially solid, it is advisable to opt for radial VIBE sequences that are time-efficient and exhibit fewer artifacts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由呼吸螺旋超短回波时间与自由呼吸径向容积内插屏气检查对肺结节诊断价值的比较。
目的:评价两种自由呼吸磁共振成像(MRI)序列-螺旋超短回波时间(螺旋UTE)和径向容积内插式屏气检查(径向VIBE)的疗效。方法:在2021年2月至2022年9月期间前瞻性纳入患者。所有参与者都接受了3T MRI扫描,利用径向VIBE序列和螺旋UTE序列,以及标准的胸部CT成像。每隔7天进行CT和MRI检查。两名放射科医生使用视觉5点有序李克特量表评估图像质量,并通过与CT的比较来评估MRI上发现的肺结节作为参考标准。结果:共52例患者参与本研究,期间通过CT成像发现82个肺结节。螺旋UTE序列描述肺血管和气道的图像质量得分(4.61±0.63;(4.76±0.48)显著高于VIBE径向序列(4.27±0.87;结论:螺旋UTE序列在显示磨砂玻璃结节、血管和气道方面具有优势。在出现磨砂玻璃结节的病例中,螺旋ut序列是首选。相反,当结节为实性或部分实性时,建议选择径向VIBE序列,这样既省时又少伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) imaging with conventional MR imaging for the diagnosis of traumatic fractures in children. Application of CT-based radiomics combined with laboratory tests such as AFP and PIVKA-II in preoperative prediction of pathologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparative analysis of intestinal tumor segmentation in PET CT scans using organ based and whole body deep learning. Correction: Distinct circle of willis anatomical configurations in healthy preterm born adults: a 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography study. Radiomics model building from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 expression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1