Comparison of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004374
Tommy Thai, Lisa Hong, Christopher Hauschild, Tomona Iso
{"title":"Comparison of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.","authors":"Tommy Thai, Lisa Hong, Christopher Hauschild, Tomona Iso","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) have been used for treating acute hyperkalaemia. The pharmacodynamic properties of SZC suggest greater theoretical utility in the acute setting than SPS, but there is no clear guidance on an optimal potassium binder. This study evaluated the efficacy of SZC and SPS in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult hospitalised patients who had acute hyperkalaemia (serum potassium level ≥5.5 mmol/L) and were treated with either SZC or SPS from April 2021 to August 2023. The primary outcome was time to first occurrence of potassium normalisation which was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included potassium normalisation, serum potassium level trends, newly initiated dialysis following acute hyperkalaemia, in-hospital death and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 46 patients with 17 in the SZC group and 29 in the SPS group. Potassium normalisation was attained in 16 (94%) in the SZC group and 27 (93%) in the SPS group and, of those, five (29%) in the SZC group and five (17%) in the SPS group attained normal potassium levels within 8 hours (HR 1.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 6.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Statistically, neither SZC nor SPS was more efficacious; however, the quicker onset of SZC could provide a clinically meaningful difference in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) have been used for treating acute hyperkalaemia. The pharmacodynamic properties of SZC suggest greater theoretical utility in the acute setting than SPS, but there is no clear guidance on an optimal potassium binder. This study evaluated the efficacy of SZC and SPS in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult hospitalised patients who had acute hyperkalaemia (serum potassium level ≥5.5 mmol/L) and were treated with either SZC or SPS from April 2021 to August 2023. The primary outcome was time to first occurrence of potassium normalisation which was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included potassium normalisation, serum potassium level trends, newly initiated dialysis following acute hyperkalaemia, in-hospital death and adverse events.

Results: The study included 46 patients with 17 in the SZC group and 29 in the SPS group. Potassium normalisation was attained in 16 (94%) in the SZC group and 27 (93%) in the SPS group and, of those, five (29%) in the SZC group and five (17%) in the SPS group attained normal potassium levels within 8 hours (HR 1.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 6.56).

Conclusion: Statistically, neither SZC nor SPS was more efficacious; however, the quicker onset of SZC could provide a clinically meaningful difference in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环硅酸锆钠与聚苯乙烯磺酸钠治疗急性高钾血症的比较。
目的:应用聚苯乙烯磺酸钠(SPS)和环硅酸锆钠(SZC)治疗急性高钾血症。SZC的药效学特性表明,在急性情况下,SZC比SPS具有更大的理论效用,但对于最佳的钾结合剂尚无明确的指导。本研究评价了SZC和SPS治疗急性高钾血症的疗效。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2021年4月至2023年8月期间接受SZC或SPS治疗的急性高钾血症(血钾水平≥5.5 mmol/L)的成年住院患者。主要终点是首次出现钾离子正常化的时间,使用Cox回归分析进行评估。次要结局包括钾正常化、血钾水平趋势、急性高钾血症后新开始透析、院内死亡和不良事件。结果:纳入46例患者,其中SZC组17例,SPS组29例。SZC组16例(94%)和SPS组27例(93%)的患者钾离子恢复正常,其中SZC组5例(29%)和SPS组5例(17%)在8小时内达到正常钾离子水平(HR 1.91, 95% CI 0.55 ~ 6.56)。结论:从统计学上看,SZC与SPS的疗效均不显著;然而,SZC的更快发作可能在治疗急性高钾血症方面提供临床有意义的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Advancing global hospital pharmacy: the enduring impact and call to action of the FIP Basel Statements. Resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacist or a substitute hospital pharmacist: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Evaluation of statin-induced muscle and liver adverse drug reactions in the Chinese population: a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data from 1992 to 2023. Colchicine-enzalutamide interaction: clinical implications and multi-disciplinary management. Managing refractory cytomegalovirus in an immunosuppressed patient with sarcoidosis: a case report on maribavir therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1