Retrospective Analysis of Ceftriaxone 1 Gram or 2 Grams for Bacteremia.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1177/08971900241313399
Jae Hee Park, Alan Zhao, Rachel Bain, Bessma Hassani, Christina Tang
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Ceftriaxone 1 Gram or 2 Grams for Bacteremia.","authors":"Jae Hee Park, Alan Zhao, Rachel Bain, Bessma Hassani, Christina Tang","doi":"10.1177/08971900241313399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin commonly used for treating bacteremia caused by gram-positive organisms such as <i>Streptococcus spp.</i> and gram-negative organisms such as Enterobacterales. The typical doses for treating bacteremia are either 1 gram or 2 grams daily. Despite its widespread use, there are limited data on the optimal treatment dose for bacteremia. <b>Methods:</b> This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study evaluated the difference in the clinical failure rate among patients who received 1 gram or 2 grams of ceftriaxone once daily for documented bacteremia. Clinical failure was defined as a composite of the following: antibiotic escalation, escalation to intensive care, and 30-day readmission due to an infectious cause. Adult patients admitted to Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Valley Stream, LIJ Forest Hills, or LIJ Medical Center in 2022 who received ceftriaxone were reviewed for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received ceftriaxone for endocarditis or meningitis, had a positive blood culture with a ceftriaxone-resistant pathogen, or received ceftriaxone for less than 72 hours. <b>Results:</b> A total of 128 patients were included in this study. Approximately 46.9% of the participants received a 1 gram dose, while 53.2% received a 2 gram dose. 35.4% of patients in the 2 gram group experienced clinical failure compared to 21.7% in the 1 gram group (<i>P</i> = .08, OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.11). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings indicate that the primary outcome of clinical failure did not significantly differ between the 1 gram and 2 gram doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900241313399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241313399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin commonly used for treating bacteremia caused by gram-positive organisms such as Streptococcus spp. and gram-negative organisms such as Enterobacterales. The typical doses for treating bacteremia are either 1 gram or 2 grams daily. Despite its widespread use, there are limited data on the optimal treatment dose for bacteremia. Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study evaluated the difference in the clinical failure rate among patients who received 1 gram or 2 grams of ceftriaxone once daily for documented bacteremia. Clinical failure was defined as a composite of the following: antibiotic escalation, escalation to intensive care, and 30-day readmission due to an infectious cause. Adult patients admitted to Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Valley Stream, LIJ Forest Hills, or LIJ Medical Center in 2022 who received ceftriaxone were reviewed for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received ceftriaxone for endocarditis or meningitis, had a positive blood culture with a ceftriaxone-resistant pathogen, or received ceftriaxone for less than 72 hours. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in this study. Approximately 46.9% of the participants received a 1 gram dose, while 53.2% received a 2 gram dose. 35.4% of patients in the 2 gram group experienced clinical failure compared to 21.7% in the 1 gram group (P = .08, OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.11). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the primary outcome of clinical failure did not significantly differ between the 1 gram and 2 gram doses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢曲松1克或2克治疗菌血症的回顾性分析。
背景:头孢曲松是第三代头孢菌素,常用于治疗革兰氏阳性菌如链球菌和革兰氏阴性菌如肠杆菌引起的菌血症。治疗菌血症的典型剂量是每天1克或2克。尽管它被广泛使用,但关于菌血症的最佳治疗剂量的数据有限。方法:这项经irb批准的回顾性队列研究评估了每天接受1克或2克头孢曲松治疗有记录的菌血症患者的临床失败率差异。临床失败被定义为以下情况的综合:抗生素升级,升级到重症监护,由于感染原因再入院30天。对2022年在长岛犹太(LIJ)山谷溪、LIJ森林山或LIJ医疗中心接受头孢曲松治疗的成年患者进行纳入。如果患者因心内膜炎或脑膜炎接受头孢曲松治疗,头孢曲松耐药病原体血培养阳性,或接受头孢曲松治疗少于72小时,则排除。结果:本研究共纳入128例患者。大约46.9%的参与者接受了1克的剂量,53.2%的参与者接受了2克的剂量。2克组35.4%的患者出现临床失败,而1克组为21.7% (P = 0.08, OR 0.51;95% ci 0.23-1.11)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,临床失败的主要结局在1克和2克剂量之间没有显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Care in A Safety Net Hospital: Impact of a Pharmacist Transitional Care Service. Analysis of the 2-Bag Method for the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Retrospective before and after Study. Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Contraception Service at a Safety-Net Health-System. Assessment of a Geriatric Evaluation and Management in the Home (GEMITH) Service at a Quaternary Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study. The Phenytoin Ataxia Enigma Unveiled "A Case Report''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1