Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Recording of Simultaneous Electric-Acoustic Stimulation between Round Window Membrane and Basal Part of Cochlear Bone in guinea Pigs.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004406
Yi-Chen Lin, Nai-Hsin Huang, Yu-Fu Chou, Bo-Cheng Chen, Lian-Jie Lin, Wei-Chung Hsu, Chia-Fone Lee
{"title":"Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Recording of Simultaneous Electric-Acoustic Stimulation between Round Window Membrane and Basal Part of Cochlear Bone in guinea Pigs.","authors":"Yi-Chen Lin, Nai-Hsin Huang, Yu-Fu Chou, Bo-Cheng Chen, Lian-Jie Lin, Wei-Chung Hsu, Chia-Fone Lee","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Extracochlear electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) between the round window membrane and the basal part of the cochlear bone exhibits distinct auditory brainstem response (ABR) characteristics.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of EAS in individuals with residual hearing is becoming increasingly common in clinical settings. Ongoing research has explored the characteristics of EAS-induced responses in hearing cochleae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study explored a novel extracochlear EAS approach using round window membrane-cochlear bone stimulation to maintain cochlear integrity. The electrodes stimulate the basal part of the cochlea and spare the apex, making the model ideal for EAS candidates with profound high-frequency hearing loss and residual low-frequency hearing. ABR analyses of EAS were conducted to compare responses to acoustic, electrical, and combined stimulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The threshold of EAS was higher than that of acoustic stimulation (AS) or electric stimulation (ES). The maximum peak height of the amplitude (MPHA) in the EAS showed sound pressure level (SPL)- and electric current-dependent changes, with superior performance at higher SPLs. The MPHA latency shift index analysis demonstrated significant differences between the EAS and the AS or ES only. In the context of EAS, neural responses occurring before 4 ms are defined as early responses, which are related to the stimulus. Late responses, occurring after 4 ms, suggest distinct physiological mechanisms that may involve synaptic actions or specific interactions within the EAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extracochlear EAS provides insights into its physiological implications, proposes a method for clinical application, and offers a potential avenue for improving hearing preservation and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypothesis: Extracochlear electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) between the round window membrane and the basal part of the cochlear bone exhibits distinct auditory brainstem response (ABR) characteristics.

Background: The use of EAS in individuals with residual hearing is becoming increasingly common in clinical settings. Ongoing research has explored the characteristics of EAS-induced responses in hearing cochleae.

Methods: This study explored a novel extracochlear EAS approach using round window membrane-cochlear bone stimulation to maintain cochlear integrity. The electrodes stimulate the basal part of the cochlea and spare the apex, making the model ideal for EAS candidates with profound high-frequency hearing loss and residual low-frequency hearing. ABR analyses of EAS were conducted to compare responses to acoustic, electrical, and combined stimulations.

Results: The threshold of EAS was higher than that of acoustic stimulation (AS) or electric stimulation (ES). The maximum peak height of the amplitude (MPHA) in the EAS showed sound pressure level (SPL)- and electric current-dependent changes, with superior performance at higher SPLs. The MPHA latency shift index analysis demonstrated significant differences between the EAS and the AS or ES only. In the context of EAS, neural responses occurring before 4 ms are defined as early responses, which are related to the stimulus. Late responses, occurring after 4 ms, suggest distinct physiological mechanisms that may involve synaptic actions or specific interactions within the EAS.

Conclusion: Extracochlear EAS provides insights into its physiological implications, proposes a method for clinical application, and offers a potential avenue for improving hearing preservation and performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆窗膜与耳蜗骨基底部同时电声刺激豚鼠听性脑干反应的记录。
假设:圆形窗膜与耳蜗骨基底之间的耳蜗外电声刺激(EAS)表现出明显的听觉脑干反应(ABR)特征。背景:在临床环境中,听力残障患者使用EAS正变得越来越普遍。正在进行的研究探索了easa诱导的听力耳蜗反应的特征。方法:采用圆窗膜-耳蜗骨刺激维持耳蜗的完整性。电极刺激耳蜗基底部而不刺激耳尖部,使该模型非常适合重度高频听力损失和残余低频听力的EAS候选人。对EAS进行ABR分析,比较声、电和联合刺激的反应。结果:EAS的阈值高于声刺激(AS)和电刺激(ES)。振幅的最大峰高(MPHA)表现出声压级(SPL)和电流相关的变化,在较高的声压级下具有较好的性能。MPHA延迟移位指数分析显示EAS与AS或仅ES之间存在显著差异。在EAS的背景下,发生在4ms之前的神经反应被定义为早期反应,这与刺激有关。晚反应发生在4 ms后,表明不同的生理机制可能涉及突触作用或EAS内的特定相互作用。结论:耳蜗外EAS为耳蜗的生理意义提供了新的认识,为耳蜗的临床应用提供了新的思路,为提高耳蜗的听力保护和功能提供了潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes. Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma-Associated Hearing Loss. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes Using Electrical Field Imaging (EFI). Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: 3-Year Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1