Evaluation of workload distribution and exposure factors in common use in ten general x-ray rooms in Ireland: An initial step towards protocol optimisation
{"title":"Evaluation of workload distribution and exposure factors in common use in ten general x-ray rooms in Ireland: An initial step towards protocol optimisation","authors":"C. Devery , D. Cody , L. Sweetman","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to assess current practice in general x-ray rooms in three Irish hospitals. Evaluating the extent to which x-ray protocols are currently standardised can be considered as a preparatory step towards the larger goal of implementing optimisation in a diagnostic radiology department.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data on various aspects of general x-ray room exposures was manually collected and analysed to highlight variations with exposure factors in use and workload distribution across each of the ten hospital x-ray rooms included in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Workload distribution for the x-ray rooms surveyed demonstrated the most commonly performed x-ray, the chest x-ray, to account for 44 % of exposures acquired, compared to the most recently published national statistic of 31 %<sup>1</sup>, suggesting a potential change in referral practices over the past decade. A high degree of protocol variation for the same imaging indications exists across the x-ray rooms included in the study, for example there were 14 protocols in routine use for shoulder imaging across the 10 x-ray rooms, spanning a wide range of tube potentials from 55 to 81 kVp.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The lack of x-ray protocol standardisation (and associated image quality variation) prompts questions around the implementation of optimisation, as required by Irish legislation, for general x-ray protocols. National review of x-ray referral practices or most common general x-ray exposures in use would be welcomed, as deviations from the previously published dataset are locally evident.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This body of work considers the variety of x-ray protocols in use for specific anatomical areas and outlines how similar analyses at a local level could provide a foundation for targeted optimisation exercises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 419-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study aimed to assess current practice in general x-ray rooms in three Irish hospitals. Evaluating the extent to which x-ray protocols are currently standardised can be considered as a preparatory step towards the larger goal of implementing optimisation in a diagnostic radiology department.
Methods
Data on various aspects of general x-ray room exposures was manually collected and analysed to highlight variations with exposure factors in use and workload distribution across each of the ten hospital x-ray rooms included in the study.
Results
Workload distribution for the x-ray rooms surveyed demonstrated the most commonly performed x-ray, the chest x-ray, to account for 44 % of exposures acquired, compared to the most recently published national statistic of 31 %1, suggesting a potential change in referral practices over the past decade. A high degree of protocol variation for the same imaging indications exists across the x-ray rooms included in the study, for example there were 14 protocols in routine use for shoulder imaging across the 10 x-ray rooms, spanning a wide range of tube potentials from 55 to 81 kVp.
Conclusion
The lack of x-ray protocol standardisation (and associated image quality variation) prompts questions around the implementation of optimisation, as required by Irish legislation, for general x-ray protocols. National review of x-ray referral practices or most common general x-ray exposures in use would be welcomed, as deviations from the previously published dataset are locally evident.
Implications for practice
This body of work considers the variety of x-ray protocols in use for specific anatomical areas and outlines how similar analyses at a local level could provide a foundation for targeted optimisation exercises.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.