Investigation of stakeholder perceptions of the wheelchair service delivery process.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2442705
Tyler A Beauregard, Richard M Schein, Theresa F Berner, Gina McKernan, Mark R Schmeler, Brad E Dicianno, Carmen P DiGiovine
{"title":"Investigation of stakeholder perceptions of the wheelchair service delivery process.","authors":"Tyler A Beauregard, Richard M Schein, Theresa F Berner, Gina McKernan, Mark R Schmeler, Brad E Dicianno, Carmen P DiGiovine","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2442705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The wheelchair service delivery process (SDP) is a large complex system and therefore has many potential points of failure; determining priorities for improvement is challenging. The complexities introduce several barriers to accessing and maintaining wheelchairs for individuals with mobility impairments. Given the breadth and depth of the barriers, it is important to know in which areas to focus future policy reform efforts.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to explore the perceptions of stakeholders regarding the performance of the wheelchair SDP in the United States and guide future policy reforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, observational, online questionnaire was deployed. Questions were positive statements regarding the wheelchair SDP and participants rated their agreement with the statements on a standard six-point Likert scale. A snowball sampling strategy was used and consisted of emailing 42 organisations representing 5 stakeholder groups: (1) consumers/caregivers; (2) clinicians; (3) manufacturers; (4) payers; and (5) suppliers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,052 responses were collected: 41% clinicians, 30% suppliers, 24% consumers/caregivers, 3% manufacturers, 2% payers. Stakeholders view the wheelchair SDP as not performing well. Less than 18% of all responses indicate a positive perception. Funding and procurement was viewed in the least positive light, with 5% positive responses. Follow-up, maintenance, and repair was the second least positive component with 9% positive responses. Fitting, training, and delivery was viewed most positively with over 42% positive responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The wheelchair SDP is not viewed as performing well by its stakeholders. Funding, procurement, maintenance, and repairs are viewed particularly negatively, representing opportunities for focused system reform efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1331-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2442705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The wheelchair service delivery process (SDP) is a large complex system and therefore has many potential points of failure; determining priorities for improvement is challenging. The complexities introduce several barriers to accessing and maintaining wheelchairs for individuals with mobility impairments. Given the breadth and depth of the barriers, it is important to know in which areas to focus future policy reform efforts.

Purpose: The purpose is to explore the perceptions of stakeholders regarding the performance of the wheelchair SDP in the United States and guide future policy reforms.

Methods: A cross-sectional, observational, online questionnaire was deployed. Questions were positive statements regarding the wheelchair SDP and participants rated their agreement with the statements on a standard six-point Likert scale. A snowball sampling strategy was used and consisted of emailing 42 organisations representing 5 stakeholder groups: (1) consumers/caregivers; (2) clinicians; (3) manufacturers; (4) payers; and (5) suppliers.

Results: 1,052 responses were collected: 41% clinicians, 30% suppliers, 24% consumers/caregivers, 3% manufacturers, 2% payers. Stakeholders view the wheelchair SDP as not performing well. Less than 18% of all responses indicate a positive perception. Funding and procurement was viewed in the least positive light, with 5% positive responses. Follow-up, maintenance, and repair was the second least positive component with 9% positive responses. Fitting, training, and delivery was viewed most positively with over 42% positive responses.

Conclusion: The wheelchair SDP is not viewed as performing well by its stakeholders. Funding, procurement, maintenance, and repairs are viewed particularly negatively, representing opportunities for focused system reform efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查利益相关者对轮椅服务交付过程的看法。
简介:轮椅服务交付过程(SDP)是一个庞大复杂的系统,因此有许多潜在的故障点;确定改进的优先级是具有挑战性的。这种复杂性给行动不便的人使用和维护轮椅带来了一些障碍。鉴于这些障碍的广度和深度,重要的是要知道未来政策改革的重点在哪些领域。目的:目的是探讨利益相关者对美国轮椅SDP绩效的看法,并指导未来的政策改革。方法:采用横断面、观察性、在线问卷调查。问题是关于轮椅SDP的积极陈述,参与者根据标准的6分李克特量表对他们的同意程度进行评分。采用滚雪球抽样策略,向代表5个利益相关者群体的42个组织发送电子邮件:(1)消费者/照顾者;(2)临床医师;(3)制造商;(4)纳税人;(5)供应商。结果:收集了1052份回复:41%的临床医生,30%的供应商,24%的消费者/护理人员,3%的制造商,2%的支付者。利益相关者认为轮椅SDP表现不佳。在所有回答中,只有不到18%的人表示积极的看法。对资金和采购的看法最不积极,只有5%的人持积极态度。随访、维护和修复是第二不积极的组成部分,有9%的积极反应。试穿、培训和交付被认为是最积极的,有超过42%的积极反应。结论:轮椅SDP不被其利益相关者视为表现良好。资金、采购、维护和维修被认为是特别消极的,代表了集中系统改革努力的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Beyond the binary: rethinking gender in access and use of assistive technology. The PsyPills app for stress management. What do the users think? A usability study. Adaptive systems for cognitive impairments: a systematic review of current trends and future directions. The path towards an accessible blood pressure monitor for persons living with low vision or blindness: a Canadian pilot study. A survey of graph-based assistive technologies for visually impaired students in Thailand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1