Satish Vishwanathaiah, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Shahad Mohammed Maafa, Asayil Mohammed Tulays, May Mohammed Hakami, Nassreen H Albar, Noura Alessa, Khalid Alhakami, Ali Ahmed Assiry, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih, Ather Ahmed Syed
{"title":"Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study.","authors":"Satish Vishwanathaiah, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Shahad Mohammed Maafa, Asayil Mohammed Tulays, May Mohammed Hakami, Nassreen H Albar, Noura Alessa, Khalid Alhakami, Ali Ahmed Assiry, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih, Ather Ahmed Syed","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e946802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.