Frontal Paraventricular Cysts: Refined Definitions and Outcomes.

Matthew T Whitehead, Amirreza Manteghinejad, César A P F Alves, Onur Simsek, Nahla Khalek, Erin S Schwartz
{"title":"Frontal Paraventricular Cysts: Refined Definitions and Outcomes.","authors":"Matthew T Whitehead, Amirreza Manteghinejad, César A P F Alves, Onur Simsek, Nahla Khalek, Erin S Schwartz","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Frontal paraventricular cystic changes have a varied etiology that includes connatal cysts, subependymal pseudocysts, necrosis, and enlarged perivascular spaces. These may be difficult to distinguish by neuroimaging and have a variety of associated prognoses. We aim to refine the neuroimaging definition of frontal horn cysts and correlate it with adverse clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the pre-and postnatal neuroimaging database at a quaternary referral children's hospital was searched for all reports containing \"frontal horn cysts\", \"periventricular cysts\", or \"connatal cysts\" after IRB exemption. Frontal paraventricular abnormalities were categorized as either cysts, necroses, enlarged perivascular spaces, caudothalamic groove subependymal pseudocysts, frontal horn asymmetries, intraventricular septations, or ependymal vessels based on location and appearance. Cyst number, size, location, morphology, and signal/density/echotexture were documented, as were additional brain abnormalities. Clinical outcomes were recorded when available. Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate categorical data associations, and Kruskall-Wallis tests were employed to compare the medians among groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>205 brain imaging exams (148 MRI; 55 US; 2 CT) from 110 distinct subjects (5 fetal: median 29.3, mean 27.5, and range 22.4 to 32.8 gestational weeks; 105 postnatal: mean 2.5 years, median 15 days, range 0 days to 19 years) were included. Seventy-one exams (35%) were initially diagnosed as connatal cysts but, instead, represented necrosis (n=23), enlarged perivascular spaces (n=20), caudothalamic groove germinolytic cysts (n=11), septations/adhesions (n=10), ventricular asymmetries (n=6), and a blood vessel (n=1). These entities differed in size, shape, location, and orientation (p<0.001). Congenital heart disease (p<0.04) and gastrointestinal (p<0.04) disorders were more common in subjects with frontal cysts and necrosis than in subjects with enlarged perivascular spaces; however, the frontal cyst and necrosis groups showed no differences in outcome (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frontal paraventricular cystic changes represent a common interpretive dilemma. Enlarged perivascular spaces should be distinguished from other frontal cystic changes, which portend a more guarded prognosis, whether necrotic or otherwise.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CMV= cytomegalovirus; CSPC= caudothalamic groove subependymal pseudocysts; FHCL= frontal horn cystic lesions; GA= gestational age; PVS= perivascular spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Frontal paraventricular cystic changes have a varied etiology that includes connatal cysts, subependymal pseudocysts, necrosis, and enlarged perivascular spaces. These may be difficult to distinguish by neuroimaging and have a variety of associated prognoses. We aim to refine the neuroimaging definition of frontal horn cysts and correlate it with adverse clinical conditions.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, the pre-and postnatal neuroimaging database at a quaternary referral children's hospital was searched for all reports containing "frontal horn cysts", "periventricular cysts", or "connatal cysts" after IRB exemption. Frontal paraventricular abnormalities were categorized as either cysts, necroses, enlarged perivascular spaces, caudothalamic groove subependymal pseudocysts, frontal horn asymmetries, intraventricular septations, or ependymal vessels based on location and appearance. Cyst number, size, location, morphology, and signal/density/echotexture were documented, as were additional brain abnormalities. Clinical outcomes were recorded when available. Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate categorical data associations, and Kruskall-Wallis tests were employed to compare the medians among groups.

Results: 205 brain imaging exams (148 MRI; 55 US; 2 CT) from 110 distinct subjects (5 fetal: median 29.3, mean 27.5, and range 22.4 to 32.8 gestational weeks; 105 postnatal: mean 2.5 years, median 15 days, range 0 days to 19 years) were included. Seventy-one exams (35%) were initially diagnosed as connatal cysts but, instead, represented necrosis (n=23), enlarged perivascular spaces (n=20), caudothalamic groove germinolytic cysts (n=11), septations/adhesions (n=10), ventricular asymmetries (n=6), and a blood vessel (n=1). These entities differed in size, shape, location, and orientation (p<0.001). Congenital heart disease (p<0.04) and gastrointestinal (p<0.04) disorders were more common in subjects with frontal cysts and necrosis than in subjects with enlarged perivascular spaces; however, the frontal cyst and necrosis groups showed no differences in outcome (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Frontal paraventricular cystic changes represent a common interpretive dilemma. Enlarged perivascular spaces should be distinguished from other frontal cystic changes, which portend a more guarded prognosis, whether necrotic or otherwise.

Abbreviations: CMV= cytomegalovirus; CSPC= caudothalamic groove subependymal pseudocysts; FHCL= frontal horn cystic lesions; GA= gestational age; PVS= perivascular spaces.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
额室旁囊肿:精确定义和结果。
背景和目的:额叶室旁囊性改变有多种病因,包括先天性囊肿、室管膜下假性囊肿、坏死和血管周围间隙扩大。这些可能很难通过神经影像学来区分,并且有各种相关的预后。我们的目的是完善额角囊肿的神经影像学定义,并将其与不良临床条件相关联。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,在一家第四转诊儿童医院的产前和产后神经影像学数据库中搜索所有在IRB豁免后包含“额角囊肿”、“室周囊肿”或“新生儿囊肿”的报告。根据位置和外观,额室旁异常可分为囊肿、坏死、血管周围间隙增大、尾丘脑沟室管膜下假性囊肿、额角不对称、室内隔或室管膜血管。记录了囊肿的数量、大小、位置、形态、信号/密度/回声结构,以及其他脑部异常。如有可能,记录临床结果。采用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验评价分类数据相关性,采用Kruskall-Wallis检验比较组间中位数。结果:205例脑影像学检查(MRI 148例;55我们;2 CT)从110个不同的受试者(5个胎儿:中位29.3,平均27.5,范围22.4至32.8胎周;105例出生后:平均2.5年,中位15天,范围0天至19年)。71例(35%)检查最初被诊断为先天性囊肿,但结果显示为坏死(n=23)、血管周围间隙扩大(n=20)、尾丘脑沟溶性囊肿(n=11)、分隔/粘连(n=10)、心室不对称(n=6)和血管(n=1)。这些实体在大小、形状、位置和方向上存在差异(p0.05)。结论:额叶室旁囊性变是一种常见的解释困境。血管周围间隙扩大应与其他额叶囊性改变区分开来,后者预示着更谨慎的预后,无论是坏死还是其他。缩写:CMV=巨细胞病毒;尾丘脑沟室管膜下假性囊肿;额角囊性病变;GA=胎龄;PVS=血管周围空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety in the use of Pipeline Vantage Shield stent versus Pipeline Flex Shield stent in the treatment of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. Patterns of Epidural Patch Distribution: The Influence of Spinal Level, Injection Technique, and Patch Volume/Composition on Craniocaudal and Ventral Epidural Dispersion. The effect of diagnostic hypercapnic cerebrovascular reactivity imaging on vital signs and acute and follow-up ischemic adverse events in patients with flow-limiting intracranial arterial stenosis. Comparison of prophylactic endovascular treatments for threatened or impending internal/common carotid artery blowout syndrome. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound in Neck Node NIRADS Category 2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1