Relations between psychosis and emotion regulation in daily life: A systematic review and meta-analyses of studies using experience sampling methods

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106004
Catherine Bortolon , Carla Nardelli
{"title":"Relations between psychosis and emotion regulation in daily life: A systematic review and meta-analyses of studies using experience sampling methods","authors":"Catherine Bortolon ,&nbsp;Carla Nardelli","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has shown that heightened emotionality often precedes psychotic experiences. Understanding how individuals cope with these emotions is crucial for psychosis. While prior studies on emotion regulation (ER) and psychosis have mainly relied on self-report questionnaires, recent research has increasingly utilised daily life methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis seek to examine the relationship between daily ER and psychotic experiences. In total, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis (21 in the systematic review). The results of Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) studies indicated that ER strategies of avoidance, reappraisal, repetitive thinking, and emotional suppression are not associated with psychotic experiences in daily life. The effect was not moderated by type of sample (clinical vs non-clinical), symptom (hallucination vs delusions), relation (contemporaneous vs perspective), or other methodological variables. Acceptance was found to be negatively associated with psychotic experiences, but the effect was small. These results indicate that ER in daily life might not impact directly on psychotic experiences. The results are discussed in light of conceptual and methodological limitations in the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106004"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425000041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown that heightened emotionality often precedes psychotic experiences. Understanding how individuals cope with these emotions is crucial for psychosis. While prior studies on emotion regulation (ER) and psychosis have mainly relied on self-report questionnaires, recent research has increasingly utilised daily life methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis seek to examine the relationship between daily ER and psychotic experiences. In total, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis (21 in the systematic review). The results of Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) studies indicated that ER strategies of avoidance, reappraisal, repetitive thinking, and emotional suppression are not associated with psychotic experiences in daily life. The effect was not moderated by type of sample (clinical vs non-clinical), symptom (hallucination vs delusions), relation (contemporaneous vs perspective), or other methodological variables. Acceptance was found to be negatively associated with psychotic experiences, but the effect was small. These results indicate that ER in daily life might not impact directly on psychotic experiences. The results are discussed in light of conceptual and methodological limitations in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常生活中精神病与情绪调节的关系:经验抽样研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究表明,情绪高涨往往先于精神病发作。了解个体如何应对这些情绪对治疗精神病至关重要。以往关于情绪调节(ER)和精神病的研究主要依赖于自我报告问卷,而最近的研究越来越多地利用日常生活方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究日常急诊和精神病经历之间的关系。总共有15项研究纳入meta分析(21项纳入系统评价)。经验抽样方法(ESM)研究结果表明,逃避、重新评价、重复思考和情绪抑制等内质反应策略与日常生活中的精神病经历无关。该效应不受样本类型(临床vs非临床)、症状(幻觉vs妄想)、关系(同期vs远景)或其他方法学变量的影响。研究发现,接纳与精神病经历呈负相关,但影响很小。这些结果表明,日常生活中的ER可能不会直接影响精神病经历。结果讨论了在概念和方法上的局限性,在该领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
Energy Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (EDHD): A Neurobiological Energy Dysregulation Model for ADHD. Serotonergic Psychedelics as Epigenetic Modulators: A Paradigm Shift in Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutics. Rethinking Anorexia Nervosa Through the Lens of Control, Compulsion and Reward: Neurobiological Insights Into Addiction-Like Features via the Dopaminergic, Endocannabinoid, and Orexinergic Systems - A Narrative Review. Seeing without eyes: Relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations. Neural Sensitivity to Social Feedback and Adaptations to Changing Social Contexts in Adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1