Efficacy and safety of polatuzumab-vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104611
Hanzala Ahmed Farooqi , Muhammad Saffi Ullah , Ahmed Raza , Zain Sadiq , Wardah Ali Shaikh , Rahmah Muhammad , Muhammad Shoaib Hussain
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of polatuzumab-vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hanzala Ahmed Farooqi ,&nbsp;Muhammad Saffi Ullah ,&nbsp;Ahmed Raza ,&nbsp;Zain Sadiq ,&nbsp;Wardah Ali Shaikh ,&nbsp;Rahmah Muhammad ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shoaib Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtype, relapses or becomes refractory (R/R) in 40 % of cases after initial treatment. Among the second-line treatments for these patients is CAR T-cell therapy, which is considered the gold standard and treatment better than SCT. For these patients, polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) is a novel treatment. The main goal of our research is to evaluate Pola-BR's efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We followed PRISMA criteria for conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was conducted from the start until May 2024 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. Studies included randomized-controlled trials, observational studies, and single-arm studies assessing Pola-BR efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients. The overall response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR) were the main outcomes. Using random-effect models, statistical analysis was carried out on OpenMeta[Analyst] software leading to pooled risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight studies with 398 patients were present in our study. The studies were of high quality, with pooled analysis showing a significant ORR of 52.6 % (95 % CI: 43.6 – 61.6 %), CR of 34.3 % (95 % CI: 23.5 – 45.0 %), and PR of 15.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7 – 22.3 %). Significant hematologic toxicities were observed, the most common being, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and anemia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pola-BR is an effective option for advanced R/R DLBCL but poses significant hematologic toxicity, requiring careful management. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to better understand and evaluate Pola-BR's success. To fully assess its effectiveness, comparisons with non-cell therapies are essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 104611"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824003548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtype, relapses or becomes refractory (R/R) in 40 % of cases after initial treatment. Among the second-line treatments for these patients is CAR T-cell therapy, which is considered the gold standard and treatment better than SCT. For these patients, polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) is a novel treatment. The main goal of our research is to evaluate Pola-BR's efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients.

Methods

We followed PRISMA criteria for conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was conducted from the start until May 2024 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. Studies included randomized-controlled trials, observational studies, and single-arm studies assessing Pola-BR efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients. The overall response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR) were the main outcomes. Using random-effect models, statistical analysis was carried out on OpenMeta[Analyst] software leading to pooled risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Eight studies with 398 patients were present in our study. The studies were of high quality, with pooled analysis showing a significant ORR of 52.6 % (95 % CI: 43.6 – 61.6 %), CR of 34.3 % (95 % CI: 23.5 – 45.0 %), and PR of 15.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7 – 22.3 %). Significant hematologic toxicities were observed, the most common being, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and anemia.

Conclusion

Pola-BR is an effective option for advanced R/R DLBCL but poses significant hematologic toxicity, requiring careful management. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to better understand and evaluate Pola-BR's success. To fully assess its effectiveness, comparisons with non-cell therapies are essential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polatuzumab-Vedotin联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤亚型,在初始治疗后40%的病例复发或变得难治性(R/R)。在这些患者的二线治疗中,CAR - t细胞治疗被认为是金标准,治疗效果优于SCT。对于这些患者,polatuzumab vedotin联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(Pola-BR)是一种新的治疗方法。我们研究的主要目的是评估Pola-BR在R/R DLBCL患者中的疗效。方法:我们遵循PRISMA标准进行系统评价和荟萃分析。从一开始到2024年5月,使用Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和clinicaltrials.gov进行了搜索。研究包括随机对照试验、观察性研究和单臂研究,评估Pola-BR对R/R DLBCL患者的疗效。总缓解率(ORR)、部分缓解率(PR)和完全缓解率(CR)是主要预后指标。采用随机效应模型,在OpenMeta[Analyst]软件上进行统计分析,得出95%置信区间(ci)的合并风险比。结果:我们的研究纳入了8项研究,共398例患者。这些研究质量很高,合并分析显示ORR为52.6% (95% CI: 43.6 - 61.6%), CR为34.3% (95% CI: 23.5 - 45.0%), PR为15.5% (95% CI: 8.7 - 22.3%)。观察到明显的血液学毒性,最常见的是中性粒细胞减少症、血小板减少症、神经病变和贫血。结论:Pola-BR是晚期R/R DLBCL的有效选择,但具有明显的血液学毒性,需要谨慎管理。需要进一步的高质量随机试验来更好地了解和评估Pola-BR的成功。为了充分评估其有效性,必须将其与非细胞疗法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board First-line treatments for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Systematic literature review of clinical evidence Harnessing tumor metabolism during cancer treatment: A narrative review of emerging dietary approaches Enhancing breast cancer surgery outcomes: A comprehensive review of oncoplastic techniques, surgical planning, and aesthetic considerations Targeting clonal mutations with synthetic microbes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1