Efficacy and safety of polatuzumab-vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hanzala Ahmed Farooqi , Muhammad Saffi Ullah , Ahmed Raza , Zain Sadiq , Wardah Ali Shaikh , Rahmah Muhammad , Muhammad Shoaib Hussain
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of polatuzumab-vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hanzala Ahmed Farooqi , Muhammad Saffi Ullah , Ahmed Raza , Zain Sadiq , Wardah Ali Shaikh , Rahmah Muhammad , Muhammad Shoaib Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtype, relapses or becomes refractory (R/R) in 40 % of cases after initial treatment. Among the second-line treatments for these patients is CAR T-cell therapy, which is considered the gold standard and treatment better than SCT. For these patients, polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) is a novel treatment. The main goal of our research is to evaluate Pola-BR's efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We followed PRISMA criteria for conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was conducted from the start until May 2024 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. Studies included randomized-controlled trials, observational studies, and single-arm studies assessing Pola-BR efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients. The overall response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR) were the main outcomes. Using random-effect models, statistical analysis was carried out on OpenMeta[Analyst] software leading to pooled risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight studies with 398 patients were present in our study. The studies were of high quality, with pooled analysis showing a significant ORR of 52.6 % (95 % CI: 43.6 – 61.6 %), CR of 34.3 % (95 % CI: 23.5 – 45.0 %), and PR of 15.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7 – 22.3 %). Significant hematologic toxicities were observed, the most common being, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and anemia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pola-BR is an effective option for advanced R/R DLBCL but poses significant hematologic toxicity, requiring careful management. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to better understand and evaluate Pola-BR's success. To fully assess its effectiveness, comparisons with non-cell therapies are essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 104611"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824003548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtype, relapses or becomes refractory (R/R) in 40 % of cases after initial treatment. Among the second-line treatments for these patients is CAR T-cell therapy, which is considered the gold standard and treatment better than SCT. For these patients, polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) is a novel treatment. The main goal of our research is to evaluate Pola-BR's efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients.
Methods
We followed PRISMA criteria for conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was conducted from the start until May 2024 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. Studies included randomized-controlled trials, observational studies, and single-arm studies assessing Pola-BR efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients. The overall response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR) were the main outcomes. Using random-effect models, statistical analysis was carried out on OpenMeta[Analyst] software leading to pooled risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Eight studies with 398 patients were present in our study. The studies were of high quality, with pooled analysis showing a significant ORR of 52.6 % (95 % CI: 43.6 – 61.6 %), CR of 34.3 % (95 % CI: 23.5 – 45.0 %), and PR of 15.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7 – 22.3 %). Significant hematologic toxicities were observed, the most common being, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and anemia.
Conclusion
Pola-BR is an effective option for advanced R/R DLBCL but poses significant hematologic toxicity, requiring careful management. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to better understand and evaluate Pola-BR's success. To fully assess its effectiveness, comparisons with non-cell therapies are essential.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.