Explain it as simple as possible, but no simpler – Explanation via model simplification for addressing inferential gap

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104279
Sarath Sreedharan, Siddharth Srivastava, Subbarao Kambhampati
{"title":"Explain it as simple as possible, but no simpler – Explanation via model simplification for addressing inferential gap","authors":"Sarath Sreedharan, Siddharth Srivastava, Subbarao Kambhampati","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the core challenges of explaining decisions made by modern AI systems is the need to address the potential gap in the inferential capabilities of the system generating the decision and the user trying to make sense of it. This <ce:italic>inferential capability gap</ce:italic> becomes even more critical when it comes to explaining sequential decisions. While there have been some isolated efforts at developing explanation methods suited for complex decision-making settings, most of these current efforts are limited in scope. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for generating explanations in the presence of inferential capability gaps. A framework that is grounded in the generation of simplified representations of the agent model through the application of a sequence of model simplifying transformations. This framework not only allows us to develop an extremely general explanation generation algorithm, but we see that many of the existing works in this direction could be seen as specific instantiations of our more general method. While the ideas presented in this paper are general enough to be applied to any decision-making framework, we will focus on instantiating the framework in the context of stochastic planning problems. As a part of this instantiation, we will also provide an exhaustive characterization of explanatory queries and an analysis of various classes of applicable transformations. We will evaluate the effectiveness of transformation-based explanations through both synthetic experiments and user studies.","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2024.104279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the core challenges of explaining decisions made by modern AI systems is the need to address the potential gap in the inferential capabilities of the system generating the decision and the user trying to make sense of it. This inferential capability gap becomes even more critical when it comes to explaining sequential decisions. While there have been some isolated efforts at developing explanation methods suited for complex decision-making settings, most of these current efforts are limited in scope. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for generating explanations in the presence of inferential capability gaps. A framework that is grounded in the generation of simplified representations of the agent model through the application of a sequence of model simplifying transformations. This framework not only allows us to develop an extremely general explanation generation algorithm, but we see that many of the existing works in this direction could be seen as specific instantiations of our more general method. While the ideas presented in this paper are general enough to be applied to any decision-making framework, we will focus on instantiating the framework in the context of stochastic planning problems. As a part of this instantiation, we will also provide an exhaustive characterization of explanatory queries and an analysis of various classes of applicable transformations. We will evaluate the effectiveness of transformation-based explanations through both synthetic experiments and user studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尽可能简单地解释它,但不要更简单-通过模型简化来解决推理差距的解释
解释现代人工智能系统做出的决策的核心挑战之一是,需要解决系统生成决策和用户试图理解决策的推理能力之间的潜在差距。当涉及到解释顺序决策时,这种推断能力差距变得更加关键。虽然在开发适合复杂决策设置的解释方法方面已经有了一些孤立的努力,但目前这些努力中的大多数在范围上是有限的。在本文中,我们介绍了在存在推理能力差距的情况下生成解释的一般框架。通过应用一系列模型简化转换,以生成代理模型的简化表示为基础的框架。这个框架不仅允许我们开发一个极其通用的解释生成算法,而且我们看到在这个方向上的许多现有工作可以被视为我们更通用方法的具体实例。虽然本文中提出的思想足够普遍,可以应用于任何决策框架,但我们将重点放在随机规划问题背景下实例化框架。作为实例化的一部分,我们还将提供解释性查询的详尽特征描述,并分析各种类型的可应用转换。我们将通过综合实验和用户研究来评估基于转换的解释的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
期刊最新文献
TTVAE: Transformer-based generative modeling for tabular data generation Explain it as simple as possible, but no simpler – Explanation via model simplification for addressing inferential gap Beyond incompatibility: Trade-offs between mutually exclusive fairness criteria in machine learning and law CureGraph: Contrastive multi-modal graph representation learning for urban living circle health profiling and prediction A semantic framework for neurosymbolic computation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1