Identification of seismogenic fault network using earthquake focal mechanisms and stress constraints: A case of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence, South Korea

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Tectonophysics Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230613
Chandong Chang, Tae-Seob Kang, Dabeen Heo
{"title":"Identification of seismogenic fault network using earthquake focal mechanisms and stress constraints: A case of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence, South Korea","authors":"Chandong Chang, Tae-Seob Kang, Dabeen Heo","doi":"10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a method to identify fault planes from earthquake focal mechanisms using stress field constraints to determine subsurface seismogenic fault geometry. Fault-plane ambiguity in focal mechanisms is resolved by applying two-step stress constraints. First, fault planes are inferred from the two nodal planes in each case by selecting those with the higher fault instability parameter, a function defined by plane orientations and stress state, using a commonly employed iterative linear stress inversion method. Second, the inferred fault planes are further screened by extracting those with a sufficiently high fault instability relative to the respective corresponding auxiliary planes, which is quantified by the instability ratio (<ce:italic>IR</ce:italic>) between the fault and auxiliary planes. Synthetic tests show that the threshold <ce:italic>IR</ce:italic> value, above which the inferred faults are all actual faults, varies with the degree of dispersion in fault instability. We apply the fault plane identification method to the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence, which includes the largest instrumentally recorded event (M<ce:inf loc=\"post\">L</ce:inf> 5.8) on the Korean Peninsula. For the Gyeongju earthquake sequence, faults having <ce:italic>IR</ce:italic> values greater than either ∼1.2 or ∼1.3, depending on the variability in stress state, are considered actual faults. The orientations and locations of individual faults provide better constraints for modeling the fault network than using hypocentral locations only. The constructed fault network consists of several fault structures that display four distinct orientations and constitute two conjugate fault systems. Our method can contribute to fault modeling at depth by providing independent clues for seismogenic fault geometry.","PeriodicalId":22257,"journal":{"name":"Tectonophysics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a method to identify fault planes from earthquake focal mechanisms using stress field constraints to determine subsurface seismogenic fault geometry. Fault-plane ambiguity in focal mechanisms is resolved by applying two-step stress constraints. First, fault planes are inferred from the two nodal planes in each case by selecting those with the higher fault instability parameter, a function defined by plane orientations and stress state, using a commonly employed iterative linear stress inversion method. Second, the inferred fault planes are further screened by extracting those with a sufficiently high fault instability relative to the respective corresponding auxiliary planes, which is quantified by the instability ratio (IR) between the fault and auxiliary planes. Synthetic tests show that the threshold IR value, above which the inferred faults are all actual faults, varies with the degree of dispersion in fault instability. We apply the fault plane identification method to the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence, which includes the largest instrumentally recorded event (ML 5.8) on the Korean Peninsula. For the Gyeongju earthquake sequence, faults having IR values greater than either ∼1.2 or ∼1.3, depending on the variability in stress state, are considered actual faults. The orientations and locations of individual faults provide better constraints for modeling the fault network than using hypocentral locations only. The constructed fault network consists of several fault structures that display four distinct orientations and constitute two conjugate fault systems. Our method can contribute to fault modeling at depth by providing independent clues for seismogenic fault geometry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tectonophysics
Tectonophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid arth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods
期刊最新文献
Structural style of the Guañacos Fold and Thrust Belt (southern Central Andes): A tectonic setting for the Cura Mallín Basin revisited Subsurface structure of a foreland basin from analysis of gravity and aeromagnetic data: Revealing the basement structure of Gharb Basin, NW Morocco Surface deformation and geometry of the Himalayan frontal thrust system in Pakistan: An insight from InSAR and seismic interpretation Identification of seismogenic fault network using earthquake focal mechanisms and stress constraints: A case of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence, South Korea Lithospheric flexure and effective elastic thickness under the Ulleung Basin in the East Sea using gravitational coherence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1