Efficient Class C prediction of PVD-improved soft clay settlements

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Engineering Geology Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107903
Shan Huang, Jinsong Huang, Richard Kelly, Merrick Jonse, Patrick Wong, Stanley Yuen, A.H.M. Kamruzzaman, Shui-Hua Jiang
{"title":"Efficient Class C prediction of PVD-improved soft clay settlements","authors":"Shan Huang, Jinsong Huang, Richard Kelly, Merrick Jonse, Patrick Wong, Stanley Yuen, A.H.M. Kamruzzaman, Shui-Hua Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soft clays exhibit significant challenges in geotechnical engineering due to their low permeability, high compressibility, and susceptibility to settlement under applied loads. These geological factors pose unique difficulties in predicting long-term settlement accurately and efficiently, particularly through Class C prediction methods that involve iterative processes with complex numerical models. To address these challenges, this study presents an efficient approach for Class C prediction of long-term settlement in soft clays. This approach integrates Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods (BUS) and the general simplified Hypothesis B method which is a semi-analytical method based on one-dimensional elastic visco-plastic (1D EVP) model. Unlike previous research that used Response Surface Model (RSM) with polynomial function for consolidation evaluation, the proposed approach enhances both accuracy and performance consistency under varying conditions. Additionally, by leveraging analytical solutions instead of iterative small-time steps required by Finite Element Method (FEM) or Finite Difference Method (FDM), the computational efficiency is also enhanced. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through its application to an embankment improved with prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) in Ballina, New South Wales, Australia. Comparative analyses demonstrate that the predicted settlements from this study, using only the monitoring settlement data collected prior to the 76th day of the project, align closely with the results from established RSM and FEM-based Bayesian back analysis approaches. The obtained results also indicate that the predicted settlements, based on 76 days of monitoring data, closely match field measurements at various depths, whether relying solely on settlement data or integrating additional pore water pressure data. For the Ballina embankment, over 40,000 consolidation analyses required for a single BUS simulation can be completed within 10 h using the general simplified Hypothesis B method, compared to months it might take with FEM or FDM approaches. This makes the proposed approach a practical tool for geotechnical engineers, enabling reliable settlement predictions early in the project timeline while maintaining low computational costs.","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107903","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft clays exhibit significant challenges in geotechnical engineering due to their low permeability, high compressibility, and susceptibility to settlement under applied loads. These geological factors pose unique difficulties in predicting long-term settlement accurately and efficiently, particularly through Class C prediction methods that involve iterative processes with complex numerical models. To address these challenges, this study presents an efficient approach for Class C prediction of long-term settlement in soft clays. This approach integrates Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods (BUS) and the general simplified Hypothesis B method which is a semi-analytical method based on one-dimensional elastic visco-plastic (1D EVP) model. Unlike previous research that used Response Surface Model (RSM) with polynomial function for consolidation evaluation, the proposed approach enhances both accuracy and performance consistency under varying conditions. Additionally, by leveraging analytical solutions instead of iterative small-time steps required by Finite Element Method (FEM) or Finite Difference Method (FDM), the computational efficiency is also enhanced. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through its application to an embankment improved with prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) in Ballina, New South Wales, Australia. Comparative analyses demonstrate that the predicted settlements from this study, using only the monitoring settlement data collected prior to the 76th day of the project, align closely with the results from established RSM and FEM-based Bayesian back analysis approaches. The obtained results also indicate that the predicted settlements, based on 76 days of monitoring data, closely match field measurements at various depths, whether relying solely on settlement data or integrating additional pore water pressure data. For the Ballina embankment, over 40,000 consolidation analyses required for a single BUS simulation can be completed within 10 h using the general simplified Hypothesis B method, compared to months it might take with FEM or FDM approaches. This makes the proposed approach a practical tool for geotechnical engineers, enabling reliable settlement predictions early in the project timeline while maintaining low computational costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Research on hydraulic fracture propagation and interwell interference mechanisms during multi-well pad fracturing in shale reservoirs Particle breakage behavior of silty loess: Insights based on experimental tests, image analysis, and numerical simulation Integrated geological modeling of partially exposed Precambrian bedrock surface and thickness of overlying Quaternary deposits Efficient Class C prediction of PVD-improved soft clay settlements Numerical investigation of large-slope planar failure considering entrainment effects: New insights into the 2009 JWS event
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1