Introducing a special issue of rapid research on disposable e-cigarettes

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1111/add.16759
Jamie Brown, Suzanne Colby, Natalie Walker
{"title":"Introducing a special issue of rapid research on disposable e-cigarettes","authors":"Jamie Brown,&nbsp;Suzanne Colby,&nbsp;Natalie Walker","doi":"10.1111/add.16759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much has been written about e-cigarettes since they first started to become popular early in the 2010s. A PubMed search returns over 10 000 articles including the terms ‘e-cigarettes’ or ‘vaping’. Research has established that e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes, effective for smoking cessation and were initially primarily used by people who had smoked cigarettes [<span>1-4</span>]. Since approximately 2021, new forms of disposable e-cigarettes rapidly became popular in many countries [<span>5-12</span>], including among never smokers, particularly adolescents and young adults [<span>3-7</span>]. These devices typically deliver nicotine more effectively than older types, are sold cheaply and are widely available (as opposed to only being sold in specialist vape shops).</p><p>This rapid growth in the availability and use of disposable e-cigarettes in many countries raises important new research questions. In outlining our call for research on disposable e-cigarettes, we sought submissions that assessed the harms of, and addiction to, new disposable devices; sought to understand their appeal, marketing and harm perceptions; evaluated effectiveness for reducing cigarette cravings, supporting quit attempts and smoking cessation; described the epidemiology of use, including prevalence by key subgroups, the profile of users over time, and characteristics relating to use; estimated the extent to which use is displacing smoking or use of other e-cigarettes; modelled the impact at a population-level under varying assumptions and policy or regulation scenarios; or estimated the environmental impact of the products [<span>13</span>].</p><p>Since our call, the world has already moved on with many governments acting to address the rapid growth in uptake of disposable e-cigarettes, with new regulations specific to the new devices. For example, the United Kingdom (UK) has announced the sale of disposables e-cigarettes will be banned from June 2025 (under environmental legislation). From January 2024, the importation of disposable vapes was prohibited in Australia [<span>14</span>], with a number of other countries implementing or considering similar measures. Rapid research to inform regulatory approaches is urgently required.</p><p>We received a number of high-quality submissions and are publishing 16 reports with three commentaries in this special issue, which we have grouped into the following themes: use and appeal of disposables in youth and young adults; the characteristics of disposables; and prevalence trends and harms.</p><p>On the topic of youth and young adults, Hammond et al. [<span>15</span>] documented an increase in the use of disposables from around 2020 to 2023 across Canada, England and the United States (US) among 19 710 16 to 19 year-olds who had vaped in the past 30 days, using data from the invaluable international tobacco control (ITC) project collected between 2017 and 2023. The study made it clear that although all three countries reported similar shifts to disposable devices among youth who vaped, the increases appeared to be driven by different brands at different times in each country. East et al. [<span>16</span>] also used ITC data to examine use and reasons for use among 1355 16 to 29 year-olds in England in 2022. This study established the most popular brand was Elf Bar, being used by approximately half those who vaped in England, and mainly chosen for subjective responses such as the flavour/taste, rather than for quitting smoking. Azagba et al. [<span>17</span>] analysed the 2022 US National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) of 14 389 high school students in grades 9 to 12, and found that compared with non-use, use of disposables was more common among those who were female, older and/or identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual and those who smoked less frequently. Mattingly et al. [<span>18</span>] also used the NYTS, but focused only on the 4137 youth who vaped, and included both middle and high school students (9–18 years old) from 2021 and 2022. In this sample, older age, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, nicotine vaping and flavoured e-cigarette use were associated with mainly using disposable e-cigarettes relative to other e-cigarette types. Chen-Sankey et al. [<span>19</span>] reported findings from a laboratory study that examined visual attention to 14 different marketing features of 32 social media posts for disposable e-cigarettes among 72 non-tobacco using and 42 cigarette smoking youth (18–29 years old). Viewing these post images, youth were particularly visually engaged by information about the social media account (e.g. account profile pictures, hashtags), product descriptions and by marketing features that enhanced the products' personal relatability. Positive perceptions of disposable e-cigarettes were associated with engagement with the product package features. Among youth who smoked, positive perceptions of disposables were associated with a fruit/candy descriptor and price promotion. In a convenience sample of 1313 young (15–24 years old) US users of disposable e-cigarettes, Donovan et al. [<span>20</span>] reported that approximately half threw their disposables into the regular trash/rubbish, at an average of around three devices per month, raising safety and environmental concerns. Notley et al. [<span>21</span>] qualitatively explored 29 young people's (16–20 years old) experiences and use of disposable vapes in the United Kingdom. The authors found disposable vapes were attractive, accessible and normalized in this population, despite being seen as potentially damaging to health. Further, the act of vaping and smoking were engaged in interchangeably. In this context, the authors raised the concern that strict regulation on e-cigarettes may risk the unintended consequence of prompting a switch from vaping to smoking.</p><p>On the subject of the characteristics of disposables, Jackson et al. [<span>22</span>] reported on trends in nicotine strength used in e-liquids among a sample of 7314 vapers (≥18 years old) who completed the nationally representative Smoking Toolkit Study (STS) in England between 2016 and 2024. Use of high-strength (≥20 mg/mL) nicotine e-liquids in England increased sharply from approximately 4% in 2021 to approximately 33% in 2024. This coincided with when disposables became popular and the rise was most pronounced among those using disposable e-cigarettes, those 18 to 24 years and across all smoking statuses (including never smokers) except long-term (≥1 year) ex-smokers. Nottage et al. [<span>23</span>] performed a content analysis of the packaging of popular disposable vapes and e-liquid bottles in brick-and-mortar and on-line shops in England, Canada and the United States. They found popular disposable vapes and e-liquid bottles had varying compliance with local packaging regulations and inconsistent labelling of nicotine and product characteristics. In response to the use of colourful designs, evocative descriptors and appealing graphics to promote flavours, the authors called for improved packaging regulation and enforcement. Ma et al. [<span>24</span>] identified key characteristics of 2320 unique on-line disposable e-cigarettes and estimated associations with pricing and consumer preferences, scraped from the websites of five US on-line vape shops. Consumers appeared to prefer disposable e-cigarettes with lower capacity batteries, high nicotine concentrations, no synthetic nicotine and fruit/sweet flavours. Disposables with greater volume were also associated with lower standardized price. Leigh et al. [<span>25</span>] compared the differences in nicotine content and form, aerosol emissions and flavouring chemicals in a convenience sample of eight US and UK Elfbar disposable e-cigarettes with the same flavour labels. Likely reflecting different national regulatory requirements, the authors reported that people using Elfbar sold in the United States were estimated to receive a dose of nicotine delivered per puff four times higher from than for the UK Elfbar. Keller-Hamilton et al. [<span>26</span>] reported a human laboratory assessment of nicotine delivery, vaping topography and subjective effects of usual brand electronic cigarette use among 96 youth (18–25 years old) in the United States. Nearly half of participants used disposable e-cigarettes, and the e-cigarettes used delivered large quantities of nicotine (similar to cigarettes), significantly relieved withdrawal symptoms and were appealing.</p><p>For the theme of prevalence trends and harms, East et al. [<span>27</span>] assessed an on-line convenience sample to examine the features and types of vaping products that 494 adults in the United Kingdom, who currently smoked and/or vaped at least monthly, believed could negatively impact their health. Higher nicotine concentrations, more e-liquid consumed and salt (vs. freebase) nicotine were most commonly perceived by participants to increase the health harms of vaping. Disposables were perceived as slightly more harmful than reusable devices. Jackson et al. [<span>28</span>] reported on the source of purchase among a sample of 6507 adult (≥18 years old) current vapers (daily or non-daily) collected by the STS in England between 2016 and 2023. They found that supermarkets and convenience stores superseded vape shops as the primary source of purchase of e-cigarettes from approximately 2021 onward. This change appeared to be driven by the rising popularity of disposable e-cigarettes among younger adults, who tended to buy disposables from supermarkets/convenience stores. Craft et al. [<span>29</span>] aimed to detect and quantify synthetic cannabinoids in seven illicitly sourced disposable vape samples that were sold as cannabis products in the United Kingdom and closely resembled legal, regulated nicotine-based disposable products. These products were obtained from a single individual presenting to a drug and alcohol service in the United Kingdom. The authors detected a synthetic cannabinoid (SC 5F-MDMB-PICA) in all seven vapes. Klosterhalfen et al. [<span>30</span>] reported on prevalence trends in the use of different types of e-cigarettes in people 14 years old and over in Germany, collected by the nationally representative DEBRA study between 2016 and 2023. The use of e-cigarettes increased over this time period, especially disposables. The timing of the observed shift was similar to that seen in the United Kingdom and United States, but started from a lower baseline, increasing from 0.1% to 0.8%. Users of disposable vapes were also younger than users of other types of e-cigarettes. However, the overall vaping prevalence in Germany (2.2% in 2023) remained much lower than the prevalence of tobacco smoking (~30%).</p><p>In summary, this special issue pulls together a collection of cutting-edge research reports on key topics relating to the rapid growth in the use of disposable e-cigarettes. There remain important research gaps on comparative harms and addiction; comparative effectiveness for smoking cessation and long-term relapse prevention; and observed or modelled estimates on the extent to which use of disposable vapes is displacing smoking in different national and regulatory contexts. In those countries banning disposables, or planning to, a key future challenge will be how to define and regulate new products that circumvent such legislation [<span>31</span>] by becoming technically reusable whilst retaining other key product features and branding, and may still be treated as disposable in practice (i.e. ‘reusable disposables’).</p><p>J.B. has received (most recently in 2018) unrestricted funding to study smoking cessation from J&amp;J and Pfizer, who manufacture medically licensed smoking cessation treatments. S.M.C. has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence this editorial. NW reports grants from the Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand (NZ) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council to undertake clinical trials on: 1) e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (e-cigarettes were purchased from e-cigarette retailers), 2) cytisine for smoking cessation (cytisine supplied at no cost by Achieve Life Sciences), and 3) NRT for smoking cessation (NRT supplied at no cost by the NZ Government via their contract with Novartis). NW is currently leading a HRC-funded vaping cessation trial where nicotine patches are supplied at no cost by the NZ Government via their contract with Haleon, and nicotine mouth spray is purchased from Kenvue).</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"120 3","pages":"398-401"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16759","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16759","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much has been written about e-cigarettes since they first started to become popular early in the 2010s. A PubMed search returns over 10 000 articles including the terms ‘e-cigarettes’ or ‘vaping’. Research has established that e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes, effective for smoking cessation and were initially primarily used by people who had smoked cigarettes [1-4]. Since approximately 2021, new forms of disposable e-cigarettes rapidly became popular in many countries [5-12], including among never smokers, particularly adolescents and young adults [3-7]. These devices typically deliver nicotine more effectively than older types, are sold cheaply and are widely available (as opposed to only being sold in specialist vape shops).

This rapid growth in the availability and use of disposable e-cigarettes in many countries raises important new research questions. In outlining our call for research on disposable e-cigarettes, we sought submissions that assessed the harms of, and addiction to, new disposable devices; sought to understand their appeal, marketing and harm perceptions; evaluated effectiveness for reducing cigarette cravings, supporting quit attempts and smoking cessation; described the epidemiology of use, including prevalence by key subgroups, the profile of users over time, and characteristics relating to use; estimated the extent to which use is displacing smoking or use of other e-cigarettes; modelled the impact at a population-level under varying assumptions and policy or regulation scenarios; or estimated the environmental impact of the products [13].

Since our call, the world has already moved on with many governments acting to address the rapid growth in uptake of disposable e-cigarettes, with new regulations specific to the new devices. For example, the United Kingdom (UK) has announced the sale of disposables e-cigarettes will be banned from June 2025 (under environmental legislation). From January 2024, the importation of disposable vapes was prohibited in Australia [14], with a number of other countries implementing or considering similar measures. Rapid research to inform regulatory approaches is urgently required.

We received a number of high-quality submissions and are publishing 16 reports with three commentaries in this special issue, which we have grouped into the following themes: use and appeal of disposables in youth and young adults; the characteristics of disposables; and prevalence trends and harms.

On the topic of youth and young adults, Hammond et al. [15] documented an increase in the use of disposables from around 2020 to 2023 across Canada, England and the United States (US) among 19 710 16 to 19 year-olds who had vaped in the past 30 days, using data from the invaluable international tobacco control (ITC) project collected between 2017 and 2023. The study made it clear that although all three countries reported similar shifts to disposable devices among youth who vaped, the increases appeared to be driven by different brands at different times in each country. East et al. [16] also used ITC data to examine use and reasons for use among 1355 16 to 29 year-olds in England in 2022. This study established the most popular brand was Elf Bar, being used by approximately half those who vaped in England, and mainly chosen for subjective responses such as the flavour/taste, rather than for quitting smoking. Azagba et al. [17] analysed the 2022 US National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) of 14 389 high school students in grades 9 to 12, and found that compared with non-use, use of disposables was more common among those who were female, older and/or identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual and those who smoked less frequently. Mattingly et al. [18] also used the NYTS, but focused only on the 4137 youth who vaped, and included both middle and high school students (9–18 years old) from 2021 and 2022. In this sample, older age, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, nicotine vaping and flavoured e-cigarette use were associated with mainly using disposable e-cigarettes relative to other e-cigarette types. Chen-Sankey et al. [19] reported findings from a laboratory study that examined visual attention to 14 different marketing features of 32 social media posts for disposable e-cigarettes among 72 non-tobacco using and 42 cigarette smoking youth (18–29 years old). Viewing these post images, youth were particularly visually engaged by information about the social media account (e.g. account profile pictures, hashtags), product descriptions and by marketing features that enhanced the products' personal relatability. Positive perceptions of disposable e-cigarettes were associated with engagement with the product package features. Among youth who smoked, positive perceptions of disposables were associated with a fruit/candy descriptor and price promotion. In a convenience sample of 1313 young (15–24 years old) US users of disposable e-cigarettes, Donovan et al. [20] reported that approximately half threw their disposables into the regular trash/rubbish, at an average of around three devices per month, raising safety and environmental concerns. Notley et al. [21] qualitatively explored 29 young people's (16–20 years old) experiences and use of disposable vapes in the United Kingdom. The authors found disposable vapes were attractive, accessible and normalized in this population, despite being seen as potentially damaging to health. Further, the act of vaping and smoking were engaged in interchangeably. In this context, the authors raised the concern that strict regulation on e-cigarettes may risk the unintended consequence of prompting a switch from vaping to smoking.

On the subject of the characteristics of disposables, Jackson et al. [22] reported on trends in nicotine strength used in e-liquids among a sample of 7314 vapers (≥18 years old) who completed the nationally representative Smoking Toolkit Study (STS) in England between 2016 and 2024. Use of high-strength (≥20 mg/mL) nicotine e-liquids in England increased sharply from approximately 4% in 2021 to approximately 33% in 2024. This coincided with when disposables became popular and the rise was most pronounced among those using disposable e-cigarettes, those 18 to 24 years and across all smoking statuses (including never smokers) except long-term (≥1 year) ex-smokers. Nottage et al. [23] performed a content analysis of the packaging of popular disposable vapes and e-liquid bottles in brick-and-mortar and on-line shops in England, Canada and the United States. They found popular disposable vapes and e-liquid bottles had varying compliance with local packaging regulations and inconsistent labelling of nicotine and product characteristics. In response to the use of colourful designs, evocative descriptors and appealing graphics to promote flavours, the authors called for improved packaging regulation and enforcement. Ma et al. [24] identified key characteristics of 2320 unique on-line disposable e-cigarettes and estimated associations with pricing and consumer preferences, scraped from the websites of five US on-line vape shops. Consumers appeared to prefer disposable e-cigarettes with lower capacity batteries, high nicotine concentrations, no synthetic nicotine and fruit/sweet flavours. Disposables with greater volume were also associated with lower standardized price. Leigh et al. [25] compared the differences in nicotine content and form, aerosol emissions and flavouring chemicals in a convenience sample of eight US and UK Elfbar disposable e-cigarettes with the same flavour labels. Likely reflecting different national regulatory requirements, the authors reported that people using Elfbar sold in the United States were estimated to receive a dose of nicotine delivered per puff four times higher from than for the UK Elfbar. Keller-Hamilton et al. [26] reported a human laboratory assessment of nicotine delivery, vaping topography and subjective effects of usual brand electronic cigarette use among 96 youth (18–25 years old) in the United States. Nearly half of participants used disposable e-cigarettes, and the e-cigarettes used delivered large quantities of nicotine (similar to cigarettes), significantly relieved withdrawal symptoms and were appealing.

For the theme of prevalence trends and harms, East et al. [27] assessed an on-line convenience sample to examine the features and types of vaping products that 494 adults in the United Kingdom, who currently smoked and/or vaped at least monthly, believed could negatively impact their health. Higher nicotine concentrations, more e-liquid consumed and salt (vs. freebase) nicotine were most commonly perceived by participants to increase the health harms of vaping. Disposables were perceived as slightly more harmful than reusable devices. Jackson et al. [28] reported on the source of purchase among a sample of 6507 adult (≥18 years old) current vapers (daily or non-daily) collected by the STS in England between 2016 and 2023. They found that supermarkets and convenience stores superseded vape shops as the primary source of purchase of e-cigarettes from approximately 2021 onward. This change appeared to be driven by the rising popularity of disposable e-cigarettes among younger adults, who tended to buy disposables from supermarkets/convenience stores. Craft et al. [29] aimed to detect and quantify synthetic cannabinoids in seven illicitly sourced disposable vape samples that were sold as cannabis products in the United Kingdom and closely resembled legal, regulated nicotine-based disposable products. These products were obtained from a single individual presenting to a drug and alcohol service in the United Kingdom. The authors detected a synthetic cannabinoid (SC 5F-MDMB-PICA) in all seven vapes. Klosterhalfen et al. [30] reported on prevalence trends in the use of different types of e-cigarettes in people 14 years old and over in Germany, collected by the nationally representative DEBRA study between 2016 and 2023. The use of e-cigarettes increased over this time period, especially disposables. The timing of the observed shift was similar to that seen in the United Kingdom and United States, but started from a lower baseline, increasing from 0.1% to 0.8%. Users of disposable vapes were also younger than users of other types of e-cigarettes. However, the overall vaping prevalence in Germany (2.2% in 2023) remained much lower than the prevalence of tobacco smoking (~30%).

In summary, this special issue pulls together a collection of cutting-edge research reports on key topics relating to the rapid growth in the use of disposable e-cigarettes. There remain important research gaps on comparative harms and addiction; comparative effectiveness for smoking cessation and long-term relapse prevention; and observed or modelled estimates on the extent to which use of disposable vapes is displacing smoking in different national and regulatory contexts. In those countries banning disposables, or planning to, a key future challenge will be how to define and regulate new products that circumvent such legislation [31] by becoming technically reusable whilst retaining other key product features and branding, and may still be treated as disposable in practice (i.e. ‘reusable disposables’).

J.B. has received (most recently in 2018) unrestricted funding to study smoking cessation from J&J and Pfizer, who manufacture medically licensed smoking cessation treatments. S.M.C. has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence this editorial. NW reports grants from the Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand (NZ) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council to undertake clinical trials on: 1) e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (e-cigarettes were purchased from e-cigarette retailers), 2) cytisine for smoking cessation (cytisine supplied at no cost by Achieve Life Sciences), and 3) NRT for smoking cessation (NRT supplied at no cost by the NZ Government via their contract with Novartis). NW is currently leading a HRC-funded vaping cessation trial where nicotine patches are supplied at no cost by the NZ Government via their contract with Haleon, and nicotine mouth spray is purchased from Kenvue).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍一次性电子烟快速研究的专题。
自从电子烟在2010年代初开始流行以来,已经有很多关于电子烟的文章。在PubMed上搜索,会得到1万多篇包含“电子烟”或“雾化”的文章。研究表明,电子烟的危害比香烟小,对戒烟有效,最初主要由吸烟的人使用[1-4]。大约自2021年以来,新型一次性电子烟在许多国家迅速流行起来[5-12],包括从不吸烟的人群,特别是青少年和年轻人[3-7]。这些电子烟通常比老式电子烟更有效地释放尼古丁,价格便宜,而且随处可见(而不是只在专门的电子烟商店出售)。在许多国家,一次性电子烟的供应和使用的迅速增长提出了重要的新研究问题。在概述我们对一次性电子烟研究的呼吁时,我们征求了评估新型一次性设备危害和成瘾的意见书;试图了解它们的吸引力、营销和危害认知;评估减少香烟渴望、支持戒烟尝试和戒烟的有效性;描述了使用的流行病学,包括主要亚组的流行率、用户随时间的概况以及与使用有关的特征;估计使用电子烟取代吸烟或使用其他电子烟的程度;在不同的假设和政策或监管情景下,模拟人口水平上的影响;或估计产品对环境的影响。自我们发出呼吁以来,世界已经取得了进展,许多政府采取行动应对一次性电子烟消费快速增长的问题,并制定了针对这种新设备的新法规。例如,英国(UK)宣布将从2025年6月起(根据环境立法)禁止销售一次性电子烟。从2024年1月起,澳大利亚禁止进口一次性电子烟,其他一些国家也在实施或考虑类似的措施。迫切需要快速研究,为监管方法提供信息。我们收到了许多高质量的投稿,并在本期特刊上发表了16份报告和三篇评论,我们将其分为以下主题:一次性用品在青少年和年轻人中的使用和吸引力;一次性用品的特点;流行趋势和危害。关于青年和年轻人的话题,Hammond等人利用2017年至2023年收集的宝贵的国际烟草控制(ITC)项目的数据,记录了加拿大、英国和美国(US)在过去30天内吸过电子烟的19710名16至19岁青少年中,从2020年左右到2023年使用一次性电子烟的人数增加。该研究清楚地表明,尽管这三个国家的年轻人都报告了类似的向一次性电子烟的转变,但这种增长似乎是由每个国家不同时间的不同品牌推动的。East等人也使用ITC数据,在2022年对1355名16至29岁的英国人进行了使用和使用原因的调查。这项研究确定了最受欢迎的品牌是Elf Bar,在英国大约有一半的电子烟使用者使用它,主要是出于主观反应,比如味道/味道,而不是为了戒烟。Azagba等人分析了2022年美国全国青少年烟草调查(NYTS)对9至12年级的14389名高中生的调查,发现与不使用相比,使用一次性卷烟的人在女性、老年人和/或被认定为男同性恋、女同性恋或双性恋者以及吸烟频率较低的人中更为常见。马丁利等人也使用了《纽约时报》,但只关注了4137名吸电子烟的年轻人,包括2021年和2022年的初中生和高中生(9-18岁)。在这个样本中,相对于其他类型的电子烟,年龄较大、非西班牙裔黑人种族/民族、尼古丁雾化和调味电子烟的使用主要与使用一次性电子烟有关。Chen-Sankey等人报告了一项实验室研究的结果,该研究调查了72名非烟草使用者和42名吸烟青年(18-29岁)对32个一次性电子烟社交媒体帖子的14种不同营销特征的视觉关注。在观看这些贴出的图片时,年轻人尤其被社交媒体账户信息(如账户头像、话题标签)、产品描述以及增强产品个人相关性的营销功能所吸引。对一次性电子烟的积极看法与产品包装功能的参与有关。在吸烟的年轻人中,对一次性用品的积极看法与水果/糖果描述和价格促销有关。在1313名美国一次性电子烟年轻用户(15-24岁)的方便样本中,Donovan等人。 [20]报道称,大约一半的人将一次性产品扔进了普通垃圾/垃圾中,平均每月大约三次,这引起了人们对安全和环境的担忧。Notley等人对英国29名年轻人(16-20岁)的一次性电子烟使用经历进行了定性研究。作者发现,尽管一次性电子烟被视为对健康有潜在危害,但在这一人群中,它很有吸引力,很容易获得,而且很正常。此外,吸电子烟和吸烟的行为是可以互换的。在这种情况下,作者担心对电子烟的严格监管可能会带来意想不到的后果,促使人们从吸电子烟转向吸烟。关于一次性卷烟的特点,Jackson等人报告了2016年至2024年在英国完成具有全国代表性的吸烟工具包研究(STS)的7314名电子烟使用者(≥18岁)样本中电子烟液体中尼古丁强度的趋势。在英国,高强度(≥20mg /mL)尼古丁电子液体的使用量从2021年的约4%急剧增加到2024年的约33%。这与一次性电子烟流行的时间相吻合,在使用一次性电子烟的人群中,18至24岁的人群以及除长期(≥1年)戒烟者外的所有吸烟状态(包括从不吸烟者)中,这种增长最为明显。诺塔奇等人对英国、加拿大和美国的实体店和网上商店中流行的一次性电子烟和电子液体瓶的包装进行了内容分析。他们发现,流行的一次性电子烟和电子液体瓶符合当地包装法规的程度不一,尼古丁标签和产品特性也不一致。为了回应使用色彩缤纷的设计,唤起描述符和吸引人的图形来促进口味,作者呼吁改善包装法规和执法。Ma等人确定了2320种独特的在线一次性电子烟的关键特征,并估计了其与定价和消费者偏好的关联,这些特征来自美国五家在线电子烟商店的网站。消费者似乎更喜欢电池容量小、尼古丁浓度高、不含合成尼古丁和水果/甜味的一次性电子烟。一次性材料体积越大,标准化价格也越低。Leigh等人比较了8种美国和英国Elfbar一次性电子烟在尼古丁含量和形式、气溶胶排放和调味化学物质方面的差异,这些电子烟具有相同的风味标签。可能反映了不同国家的监管要求,作者报告说,使用在美国销售的Elfbar的人估计每吸一口的尼古丁剂量是英国Elfbar的四倍。Keller-Hamilton等人于2010年报道了一项人体实验室评估,对96名美国青少年(18-25岁)使用常用品牌电子烟的尼古丁输送、雾化地形和主观影响进行了评估。近一半的参与者使用一次性电子烟,使用的电子烟提供了大量的尼古丁(类似于香烟),显著缓解了戒断症状,很有吸引力。对于流行趋势和危害这一主题,East等人评估了一个在线便利样本,以检查英国494名目前每月至少吸烟和/或吸一次电子烟的成年人认为可能对他们的健康产生负面影响的电子烟产品的特征和类型。参与者最普遍认为,更高的尼古丁浓度、更多的电子烟液体和盐尼古丁(相对于自由碱)会增加电子烟对健康的危害。一次性设备被认为比可重复使用的设备更有害。Jackson等人[bbb]报道了2016年至2023年期间由英国STS收集的6507名成人(≥18岁)当前吸烟者(每日或非每日)样本的购买来源。他们发现,大约从2021年开始,超市和便利店取代了电子烟商店,成为电子烟的主要购买来源。这一变化似乎是由一次性电子烟在年轻人中日益流行所推动的,他们倾向于从超市/便利店购买一次性电子烟。Craft等人的目标是在英国作为大麻产品出售的七种非法来源的一次性电子烟样品中检测和量化合成大麻素,这些样品与合法的、受监管的含尼古丁的一次性产品非常相似。这些产品是从一个到英国毒品和酒精服务机构就诊的人那里获得的。作者在所有七个电子烟中检测到一种合成大麻素(SC 5F-MDMB-PICA)。Klosterhalfen等。 [30]报道了德国14岁及以上人群使用不同类型电子烟的流行趋势,这些趋势是由2016年至2023年具有全国代表性的DEBRA研究收集的。在此期间,电子烟的使用量有所增加,尤其是一次性电子烟。观察到的变化时间与英国和美国相似,但从较低的基线开始,从0.1%增加到0.8%。一次性电子烟的使用者也比其他类型电子烟的使用者更年轻。然而,德国电子烟的总体流行率(2023年为2.2%)仍远低于吸烟的流行率(约30%)。总而言之,本期特刊汇集了一系列关于一次性电子烟使用快速增长的关键主题的前沿研究报告。在比较危害和成瘾方面仍存在重要的研究空白;戒烟和长期预防复吸的比较效果;并对在不同国家和监管环境下使用一次性电子烟取代吸烟的程度进行观察或建模估计。在那些禁止或计划禁止一次性产品的国家,未来的一个关键挑战将是如何定义和监管新产品,这些新产品在技术上可重复使用的同时保留了其他关键产品特征和品牌,从而规避了此类立法,并且在实践中可能仍被视为一次性产品(即“可重复使用的一次性产品”)。获得了(最近一次是在2018年)不受限制的资金,用于研究强生公司(J&amp;J)和辉瑞公司(Pfizer)的戒烟治疗,这两家公司生产医学许可的戒烟治疗药物。中芯国际没有可能影响这篇社论的竞争经济利益或个人关系。NW报告了新西兰(NZ)卫生研究委员会(HRC)和澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会的拨款,用于开展以下临床试验:1)用于戒烟的电子烟(电子烟从电子烟零售商处购买),2)用于戒烟的胱氨酸(由Achieve Life Sciences免费提供的胱氨酸),以及3)用于戒烟的NRT (NRT由新西兰政府通过与诺华公司的合同免费提供)。NW目前正在领导一项由人权委员会资助的戒烟试验,其中尼古丁贴片由新西兰政府通过与Haleon的合同免费提供,尼古丁口腔喷雾剂从Kenvue购买)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Quitting trajectories of Hong Kong Chinese smokers receiving behavioral smoking cessation interventions: A post hoc analysis of eight randomized controlled trials. Trends in fentanyl-containing drug samples seized by law enforcement agencies across Canada. Target trial emulation for addiction research-A useful method but not a panacea. Commentary on Dobbie et al.: Preventing adolescent gambling-related harm-Is a universal approach sufficient? Varenicline for cannabis use disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1