Symptoms at population Eliciting Doses ≤ED05 for 11 priority allergenic foods are mild to moderate

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Chemical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2025.115250
W. Marty Blom , Joost Westerhout , Thuy-My Le , Steve L. Taylor , Joseph L. Baumert , Geert F. Houben
{"title":"Symptoms at population Eliciting Doses ≤ED05 for 11 priority allergenic foods are mild to moderate","authors":"W. Marty Blom ,&nbsp;Joost Westerhout ,&nbsp;Thuy-My Le ,&nbsp;Steve L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Baumert ,&nbsp;Geert F. Houben","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Insight into symptoms at low doses of protein from priority allergenic foods may support decision making and acceptance of harmonized reference doses for Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL). Symptoms were extracted from double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges underlying the full range Eliciting Dose (ED) distributions (Houben et al., 2020). Frequency and severity were analyzed at and below doses to which a maximum 10% of the allergic population is predicted to respond with objective symptoms (ED10). Detailed symptom descriptions at every dose were recorded for 1102 food challenges with 11 allergenic foods. At doses ≤ ED10, generally, 1 to 2 symptoms, either objective or subjective, occurred per positive challenge (average 1.8 ± 1.2, range 1–8). Symptoms were mostly (68%) subjective of nature. Most objective symptoms were in the skin (60–71%; e.g. flush, erythema), followed by eyes/nose and oral cavity (rhinorrhea, red eyes, lip swelling). Far less symptoms (approx. 5–8%) occurred in the gastrointestinal (vomiting) and respiratory tract (cough). Symptoms were graded mild to moderate, except for 2 cases of a severe symptom (wheeze, laryngeal edema), which occurred at a dose above the ED05 (approximately the ED08). Exposure ≤ ED05 of priority allergenic foods resulted only in mild to moderate symptoms in a small proportion of the allergic population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":317,"journal":{"name":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 115250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152500016X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insight into symptoms at low doses of protein from priority allergenic foods may support decision making and acceptance of harmonized reference doses for Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL). Symptoms were extracted from double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges underlying the full range Eliciting Dose (ED) distributions (Houben et al., 2020). Frequency and severity were analyzed at and below doses to which a maximum 10% of the allergic population is predicted to respond with objective symptoms (ED10). Detailed symptom descriptions at every dose were recorded for 1102 food challenges with 11 allergenic foods. At doses ≤ ED10, generally, 1 to 2 symptoms, either objective or subjective, occurred per positive challenge (average 1.8 ± 1.2, range 1–8). Symptoms were mostly (68%) subjective of nature. Most objective symptoms were in the skin (60–71%; e.g. flush, erythema), followed by eyes/nose and oral cavity (rhinorrhea, red eyes, lip swelling). Far less symptoms (approx. 5–8%) occurred in the gastrointestinal (vomiting) and respiratory tract (cough). Symptoms were graded mild to moderate, except for 2 cases of a severe symptom (wheeze, laryngeal edema), which occurred at a dose above the ED05 (approximately the ED08). Exposure ≤ ED05 of priority allergenic foods resulted only in mild to moderate symptoms in a small proportion of the allergic population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于11种优先致敏食物,诱导剂量≤ED05的人群症状为轻度至中度。
对来自优先致敏性食物的低剂量蛋白质的症状的深入研究,可能有助于决策制定和接受预防性过敏原标签(PAL)的统一参考剂量。症状是从全范围诱导剂量(ED)分布的双盲安慰剂对照食物挑战中提取的(Houben et al., 2020)。在最大10%的过敏人群预测有客观症状(ED10)的剂量下及以下分析频率和严重程度。记录了1102种食物对11种致敏食物的每次剂量的详细症状描述。在剂量≤ED10时,每次阳性刺激通常会出现1至2种客观或主观症状(平均1.8±1.2,范围1-8)。症状大多(68%)是主观的。大多数客观症状出现在皮肤(60-71%;例如潮红、红斑),其次是眼睛/鼻子和口腔(鼻漏、红眼、嘴唇肿胀)。症状要少得多(大约。5-8%)发生在胃肠道(呕吐)和呼吸道(咳嗽)。除2例严重症状(喘息、喉水肿)发生在ED05以上(约为ED08)外,症状分为轻度至中度。暴露于优先致敏食物≤ED05只会导致一小部分过敏人群出现轻至中度症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Food and Chemical Toxicology 工程技术-毒理学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
651
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an internationally renowned journal, that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects, in animals and humans, of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs, and chemicals, including agricultural and industrial safety, and consumer product safety. Areas such as safety evaluation of novel foods and ingredients, biotechnologically-derived products, and nanomaterials are included in the scope of the journal. FCT also encourages submission of papers on inter-relationships between nutrition and toxicology and on in vitro techniques, particularly those fostering the 3 Rs. The principal aim of the journal is to publish high impact, scholarly work and to serve as a multidisciplinary forum for research in toxicology. Papers submitted will be judged on the basis of scientific originality and contribution to the field, quality and subject matter. Studies should address at least one of the following: -Adverse physiological/biochemical, or pathological changes induced by specific defined substances -New techniques for assessing potential toxicity, including molecular biology -Mechanisms underlying toxic phenomena -Toxicological examinations of specific chemicals or consumer products, both those showing adverse effects and those demonstrating safety, that meet current standards of scientific acceptability. Authors must clearly and briefly identify what novel toxic effect (s) or toxic mechanism (s) of the chemical are being reported and what their significance is in the abstract. Furthermore, sufficient doses should be included in order to provide information on NOAEL/LOAEL values.
期刊最新文献
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, oleic acid, CAS Registry Number 112-80-1. Food-grade TiO2/TDCPP Co-exposure Disrupts ACOD1/Itaconate Axis and Is Associated with TET2-NF-κB Inflammation in Microglia Exacerbating Neurotoxicity. 6PPD-quinone promotes ovarian cancer progression: Insights from network toxicology, machine learning, and in vitro validation. Combining UHPLC Profiling and Random Walk Network-Based In Vitro Analysis to Predict Herb-Induced Liver Injury. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1