A novel MRI-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04800-7
Xiaoxiang Ning, Dengfa Yang, Weiqun Ao, Yuwen Guo, Li Ding, Zhen Zhang, Luyao Ma
{"title":"A novel MRI-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer.","authors":"Xiaoxiang Ning, Dengfa Yang, Weiqun Ao, Yuwen Guo, Li Ding, Zhen Zhang, Luyao Ma","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04800-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included data from 239 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma from two centers, all of whom underwent MRI examinations. Cases from the first center (n = 189) were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a 7:3 ratio, while cases from the second center (n = 50) constituted the external validation set. The clinical features and MRI imaging characteristics of the patients in the training set were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for LVI in rectal cancer, and these risk factors were then used to construct a clinical model. Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences for feature extraction. After feature reduction and selection, the most strongly correlated features were identified, and their respective regression coefficients were calculated to construct the radiomics model. Finally, a combined clinical-radiomics model was built using a weighted linear combination of features and was visualized as a nomogram. The predictive performance of each model was quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in both training and validation sets, with DeLong analysis being used to compare model performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of each model in the validation sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 239 patients, the combined model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in predicting LVI in rectal cancer. The combined model showed excellent predictive performance in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, with AUCs of 0.90 (0.88-0.97), 0.88 (0.78-0.99), and 0.88 (0.78-0.95), respectively. The sensitivity values were 75.9%, 68.8%, and 80.0%, respectively, and the specificity values were 90.3%, 92.7%, and 88.6%. DCA results indicated that the nomogram of the combined model had superior clinical utility compared with the clinical and radiomics models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical-radiomics nomogram serves as a valuable tool for non-invasive preoperative prediction of LVI status in patients with rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04800-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in rectal cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study included data from 239 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma from two centers, all of whom underwent MRI examinations. Cases from the first center (n = 189) were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a 7:3 ratio, while cases from the second center (n = 50) constituted the external validation set. The clinical features and MRI imaging characteristics of the patients in the training set were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for LVI in rectal cancer, and these risk factors were then used to construct a clinical model. Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences for feature extraction. After feature reduction and selection, the most strongly correlated features were identified, and their respective regression coefficients were calculated to construct the radiomics model. Finally, a combined clinical-radiomics model was built using a weighted linear combination of features and was visualized as a nomogram. The predictive performance of each model was quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in both training and validation sets, with DeLong analysis being used to compare model performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of each model in the validation sets.

Results: In the 239 patients, the combined model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in predicting LVI in rectal cancer. The combined model showed excellent predictive performance in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, with AUCs of 0.90 (0.88-0.97), 0.88 (0.78-0.99), and 0.88 (0.78-0.95), respectively. The sensitivity values were 75.9%, 68.8%, and 80.0%, respectively, and the specificity values were 90.3%, 92.7%, and 88.6%. DCA results indicated that the nomogram of the combined model had superior clinical utility compared with the clinical and radiomics models.

Conclusions: The clinical-radiomics nomogram serves as a valuable tool for non-invasive preoperative prediction of LVI status in patients with rectal cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的基于mri的放射组学技术用于直肠癌淋巴血管侵袭的术前预测。
背景:建立并验证直肠癌淋巴血管侵袭(LVI)术前预测的临床放射组学模型。方法:本回顾性研究包括来自两个中心的239例经病理证实的直肠腺癌患者的资料,所有患者均接受了MRI检查。来自第一个中心(n = 189)的病例按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和内部验证集,而来自第二个中心(n = 50)的病例组成外部验证集。分析训练集中患者的临床特征和MRI影像学特征。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定直肠癌LVI的独立危险因素,并利用这些危险因素构建临床模型。在t2加权成像(T2WI)和弥散加权成像(DWI)序列上划定感兴趣区域(roi)进行特征提取。经过特征约简和选择,识别出相关性最强的特征,并计算其各自的回归系数,构建放射组学模型。最后,利用特征的加权线性组合建立临床-放射组学联合模型,并将其可视化为nomogram。使用训练集和验证集的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)对每个模型的预测性能进行量化,并使用DeLong分析来比较模型的性能。采用决策曲线分析(Decision curve analysis, DCA)对验证集中各模型的临床效用进行评价。结果:在239例患者中,联合模型在预测直肠癌LVI方面优于临床和放射组学模型。组合模型在训练集、内部验证集和外部验证集上均表现出良好的预测性能,auc分别为0.90(0.88-0.97)、0.88(0.78-0.99)和0.88(0.78-0.95)。敏感性分别为75.9%、68.8%和80.0%,特异性分别为90.3%、92.7%和88.6%。DCA结果表明,与临床和放射组学模型相比,联合模型的nomogram具有更好的临床应用价值。结论:临床放射组学影像学检查可作为无创术前预测直肠癌患者LVI状态的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
LI-RADS for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced US with SonoVue and Sonazoid-a single center prospective study. Ovarian masses suggested for MRI examination: assessment of deep learning models based on non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequences for predicting malignancy. Percutaneous management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries using a multistep approach: clinical, functional and long-term outcomes. Adolescent endometriosis: clinical insights and imaging considerations. Artificial intelligence for abdominopelvic trauma imaging: trends, gaps, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1