Factors Influencing the Use of Shave Biopsy for Lesions Suspicious of Melanoma in Australia: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Australasian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1111/ajd.14411
Daniel Lindsay, Louisa G. Collins, Catherine M. Olsen, Nirmala Pandeya, David C. Whiteman, Luke Bookallil, Andrea McMurtrie, Lena von Schuckmann
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Use of Shave Biopsy for Lesions Suspicious of Melanoma in Australia: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Daniel Lindsay,&nbsp;Louisa G. Collins,&nbsp;Catherine M. Olsen,&nbsp;Nirmala Pandeya,&nbsp;David C. Whiteman,&nbsp;Luke Bookallil,&nbsp;Andrea McMurtrie,&nbsp;Lena von Schuckmann","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent Australian trends indicate that shave biopsies for diagnosing lesions suspicious of melanoma are increasing, yet reasons for this remain relatively unknown. We sought to understand which factors influence Australian clinicians' use of shave biopsy for managing thin lesions suspicious of melanoma in sites of low cosmetic sensitivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a convergent, exploratory mixed-methods design, with a cross-sectional online survey (<i>n</i> = 59) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (<i>n</i> = 15). We recruited clinicians working in skin cancer medicine across Australia, mostly general practitioners (&gt; 80%) with some dermatologists (<i>n</i> = 7 survey and <i>n</i> = 1 interview participant). Survey participants indicated how frequently they used shave biopsies and rated the importance of factors when considering the use of a shave biopsy. Interview participants elaborated on the motivating factors for using different biopsy techniques. Qualitative data were professionally transcribed and analysed with content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most survey participants (95%) reported that identifying fewer signs of locally advanced melanoma was ‘very important’ for using shave biopsy. Fifty per cent of survey participants also reported that faster procedure speed and greater convenience were ‘very important’ reasons for using shave biopsy. Procedure speed was particularly important for using shave biopsy among clinicians self-identifying as time-poor. Interview participants noted (a) the risk of transecting the lesion base or (b) incomplete lesion removal from shave biopsies as reasons against their use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The relative speed and convenience of shave biopsies in clinical practice are strong motivators for their use. Further evidence on patient outcomes with widespread use of shave biopsy is required to inform clinical guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"66 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent Australian trends indicate that shave biopsies for diagnosing lesions suspicious of melanoma are increasing, yet reasons for this remain relatively unknown. We sought to understand which factors influence Australian clinicians' use of shave biopsy for managing thin lesions suspicious of melanoma in sites of low cosmetic sensitivity.

Methods

We used a convergent, exploratory mixed-methods design, with a cross-sectional online survey (n = 59) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 15). We recruited clinicians working in skin cancer medicine across Australia, mostly general practitioners (> 80%) with some dermatologists (n = 7 survey and n = 1 interview participant). Survey participants indicated how frequently they used shave biopsies and rated the importance of factors when considering the use of a shave biopsy. Interview participants elaborated on the motivating factors for using different biopsy techniques. Qualitative data were professionally transcribed and analysed with content analysis.

Results

Most survey participants (95%) reported that identifying fewer signs of locally advanced melanoma was ‘very important’ for using shave biopsy. Fifty per cent of survey participants also reported that faster procedure speed and greater convenience were ‘very important’ reasons for using shave biopsy. Procedure speed was particularly important for using shave biopsy among clinicians self-identifying as time-poor. Interview participants noted (a) the risk of transecting the lesion base or (b) incomplete lesion removal from shave biopsies as reasons against their use.

Conclusions

The relative speed and convenience of shave biopsies in clinical practice are strong motivators for their use. Further evidence on patient outcomes with widespread use of shave biopsy is required to inform clinical guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响澳大利亚剃须活检用于可疑黑色素瘤病变的因素:一项探索性混合方法研究。
背景:最近澳大利亚的趋势表明,用于诊断可疑黑色素瘤病变的刮胡子活检正在增加,但其原因仍然相对未知。我们试图了解哪些因素影响澳大利亚临床医生使用剃须活检来管理在低化妆品敏感性部位可疑黑色素瘤的薄病变。方法:我们采用融合的探索性混合方法设计,包括横断面在线调查(n = 59)和半结构化定性访谈(n = 15)。我们招募了在澳大利亚从事皮肤癌医学工作的临床医生,主要是全科医生(80%)和一些皮肤科医生(n = 7调查和n = 1访谈参与者)。调查参与者指出了他们使用刮胡子活检的频率,并在考虑使用刮胡子活检时评估了因素的重要性。访谈参与者详细阐述了使用不同活检技术的激励因素。对定性数据进行专业转录和内容分析。结果:大多数调查参与者(95%)报告说,识别较少的局部晚期黑色素瘤的迹象对于使用剃须活检“非常重要”。50%的调查参与者还报告说,更快的手术速度和更大的便利性是使用剃须活检的“非常重要”的原因。对于那些自我认定时间不够的临床医生来说,使用刮刀活检的程序速度尤为重要。访谈参与者指出(a)横切病变基底的风险或(b)刮须活检不完全切除病变是反对使用它们的原因。结论:在临床实践中,刮胡子活检的相对速度和便利性是其应用的强大动力。临床指南需要进一步的证据来证明广泛使用刮胡子活检的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
期刊最新文献
Rural Exposure and Future Intent of Australian Dermatology Trainees. Drug Survival of Biological Therapies in Smokers and Non-Smokers With Psoriasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the Australasian Psoriasis Registry. Efficacy of Topical Oxytocin With Micro-Needling in the Treatment of Facial Skin Ageing: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Study. From Monotherapy to Adjunctive Therapies: Application of Dermocosmetics in Acne Management Across Australia and New Zealand. Novel Compound Heterozygous Mutations in ILNEB Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1