Patrick C Mullane, Xiaohua Qian, Hubert D Lau, Alarice Cheng-Yi Lowe
{"title":"Cytologic diagnosis of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: A single-institutional experience.","authors":"Patrick C Mullane, Xiaohua Qian, Hubert D Lau, Alarice Cheng-Yi Lowe","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FHRCC) is an aggressive carcinoma that typically presents as advanced-stage disease. Prompt recognition of FHRCC is critical for appropriate clinical care and genetic counseling for patients and family members. However, diagnosing FHRCC from cytology specimens is challenging, with limited characterization and no reports describing prospectively identified cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cytology fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as FHRCC were reviewed, including two prospectively identified cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five cases of FHRCC diagnosed by FNA cytology were identified in five unique patients. The cytologic samples included four FNAs with core biopsy and one FNA with cell block. Biopsy sites included kidney (n = 1), chest wall (n = 1), omentum (n = 1), lung (n = 1), and cervical lymph node (n = 1). All cases demonstrated cytologically malignant epithelial cells characterized by enlarged, round nuclei with variable pleomorphism, irregular nuclear membranes, prominent nucleoli, and moderate-to-abundant amounts of cytoplasm. Perinucleolar halos characterized by chromatin margination and pallor around macronucleoli were seen in all cases. Cytologic features not previously described included cytoplasmic macrovacuoles and eosinophilic globules, cytophagocytosis, and floral groups. Papillary architecture was rarely present on aspirate smears. Cell block sections showed variable architectural patterns. By immunohistochemistry, FH was definitively lost in three of five cases (60%), and 2-succinocysteine was positive in all 5 cases (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cytologic specimens of FHRCC demonstrate salient cytomorphologic features that can support their initial diagnosis. Confirmatory immunohistochemical testing using a dual panel of fumarate hydratase and 2-succinocysteine is recommended for the diagnosis in limited biopsy samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":"133 2","pages":"e22931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FHRCC) is an aggressive carcinoma that typically presents as advanced-stage disease. Prompt recognition of FHRCC is critical for appropriate clinical care and genetic counseling for patients and family members. However, diagnosing FHRCC from cytology specimens is challenging, with limited characterization and no reports describing prospectively identified cases.
Methods: Cytology fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as FHRCC were reviewed, including two prospectively identified cases.
Results: Five cases of FHRCC diagnosed by FNA cytology were identified in five unique patients. The cytologic samples included four FNAs with core biopsy and one FNA with cell block. Biopsy sites included kidney (n = 1), chest wall (n = 1), omentum (n = 1), lung (n = 1), and cervical lymph node (n = 1). All cases demonstrated cytologically malignant epithelial cells characterized by enlarged, round nuclei with variable pleomorphism, irregular nuclear membranes, prominent nucleoli, and moderate-to-abundant amounts of cytoplasm. Perinucleolar halos characterized by chromatin margination and pallor around macronucleoli were seen in all cases. Cytologic features not previously described included cytoplasmic macrovacuoles and eosinophilic globules, cytophagocytosis, and floral groups. Papillary architecture was rarely present on aspirate smears. Cell block sections showed variable architectural patterns. By immunohistochemistry, FH was definitively lost in three of five cases (60%), and 2-succinocysteine was positive in all 5 cases (100%).
Conclusions: Cytologic specimens of FHRCC demonstrate salient cytomorphologic features that can support their initial diagnosis. Confirmatory immunohistochemical testing using a dual panel of fumarate hydratase and 2-succinocysteine is recommended for the diagnosis in limited biopsy samples.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.