Significant Disparities in Adolescents With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Across Trauma Center Types: Wide Variation of Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006577
Morihiro Katsura, Shingo Fukuma, Shin Miyata, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Sindhu Daggupati, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Kazuhide Matsushima
{"title":"Significant Disparities in Adolescents With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Across Trauma Center Types: Wide Variation of Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy.","authors":"Morihiro Katsura, Shingo Fukuma, Shin Miyata, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Sindhu Daggupati, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Kazuhide Matsushima","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore practice variations in the rate and timing of tracheostomy and gastrostomy for adolescent with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across trauma center types.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2021) included adult (ATC), mixed (MTC), and pediatric trauma centers (PTC).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adolescent 14-18 years old with severe TBI (Head Abbreviated Injury Scale: 3-5 and Glasgow Coma Scale: 3-8) requiring mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A multilevel mixed-effect Poisson regression model assessed the association between trauma center type and tracheostomy/gastrostomy rates. Effect sizes for fixed effects were reported as adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% CI. Secondary analyses were performed to assess the association between trauma center types and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Of 6978 patients, tracheostomy and gastrostomy were performed in 22.5% and 21.3% at ATC, 20.8% and 21.3% at MTC, and 6.9% and 11.1% at PTC, respectively. The median time to tracheostomy was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7-13 d) at ATC, 11 days (IQR, 7-15 d) at MTC, and 15 days (IQR, 11-23 d) at PTC, demonstrating a significantly later timing of tracheostomy at PTC. In the regression model adjusting for potential confounders, treatment at PTC was significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement compared with ATC (adjusted IRR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28-0.52; p < 0.001 and adjusted IRR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the occurrence rate of VAP between ATC, MTC, and PTC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results offer insights into the existing current practice variations between ATC, MTC, and PTC in tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement for adolescent with severe TBI. Further research is warranted to examine the impact of these observed disparities on short- and long-term outcomes and to standardize the care process for adolescent patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore practice variations in the rate and timing of tracheostomy and gastrostomy for adolescent with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across trauma center types.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2021) included adult (ATC), mixed (MTC), and pediatric trauma centers (PTC).

Patients: Adolescent 14-18 years old with severe TBI (Head Abbreviated Injury Scale: 3-5 and Glasgow Coma Scale: 3-8) requiring mechanical ventilation.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: A multilevel mixed-effect Poisson regression model assessed the association between trauma center type and tracheostomy/gastrostomy rates. Effect sizes for fixed effects were reported as adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% CI. Secondary analyses were performed to assess the association between trauma center types and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Of 6978 patients, tracheostomy and gastrostomy were performed in 22.5% and 21.3% at ATC, 20.8% and 21.3% at MTC, and 6.9% and 11.1% at PTC, respectively. The median time to tracheostomy was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7-13 d) at ATC, 11 days (IQR, 7-15 d) at MTC, and 15 days (IQR, 11-23 d) at PTC, demonstrating a significantly later timing of tracheostomy at PTC. In the regression model adjusting for potential confounders, treatment at PTC was significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement compared with ATC (adjusted IRR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28-0.52; p < 0.001 and adjusted IRR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the occurrence rate of VAP between ATC, MTC, and PTC.

Conclusions: Our results offer insights into the existing current practice variations between ATC, MTC, and PTC in tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement for adolescent with severe TBI. Further research is warranted to examine the impact of these observed disparities on short- and long-term outcomes and to standardize the care process for adolescent patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年严重创伤性脑损伤在创伤中心类型上的显著差异:气管造口术和胃造口术的差异很大。
目的:探讨不同创伤中心类型青少年重型颅脑损伤(TBI)患者气管造口术和胃造口术的施行率和时机的差异。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:参与美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划(2017-2021)的创伤中心包括成人(ATC),混合(MTC)和儿科创伤中心(PTC)。患者:需要机械通气的14-18岁青少年严重TBI(头部简易损伤评分:3-5,格拉斯哥昏迷评分:3-8)。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:采用多水平混合效应泊松回归模型评估创伤中心类型与气管造口/胃造口率之间的关系。尺度效应对固定效果报告为调整发病率比和95%可信区间(IRR)。进行二次分析以评估创伤中心类型与呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)之间的关系。6978例患者中,气管造瘘和胃造瘘分别占ATC的22.5%和21.3%,MTC的20.8%和21.3%,PTC的6.9%和11.1%。气管切开术的中位时间为ATC组10天(四分位间距[IQR], 7-13天),MTC组11天(IQR, 7-15天),PTC组15天(IQR, 11-23天),表明PTC组气管切开术的时间明显较晚。回归模型的调整了潜在的混杂因素,治疗PTC能显著降低气管造口术和胃造口术安置的可能性与ATC(调整IRR, 0.38;95% ci, 0.28-0.52;p < 0.001,校正IRR为0.58;95% ci, 0.44-0.75;P < 0.001)。ATC、MTC和PTC的VAP发生率无显著性差异。结论:我们的研究结果揭示了ATC、MTC和PTC在青少年严重TBI患者气管造口术和胃造口术放置方面的现有实践差异。有必要进一步研究这些观察到的差异对短期和长期结果的影响,并使青少年患者的护理过程标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Lactated Ringer's or Normal Saline for Initial Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. The Association Between Body Mass Index and Mortality Mediated by Medical and Mechanical Complications in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. How Long Should Patients Be Treated With Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis. Geospatial Access to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States. Nelonemdaz Treatment in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Quest for the Grail Continues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1