Adequacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for next-generation sequencing in pancreatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000097
Yundi Pan, Taojing Ran, Xianda Zhang, Xianzheng Qin, Yao Zhang, Chunhua Zhou, Duowu Zou
{"title":"Adequacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for next-generation sequencing in pancreatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yundi Pan, Taojing Ran, Xianda Zhang, Xianzheng Qin, Yao Zhang, Chunhua Zhou, Duowu Zou","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>A majority of pancreatic malignancies are unresectable at the time of presentation and require EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) for diagnosis. With the advent of precision therapy, there is an increasing need to use EUS-FNA/FNB sample for genetic analysis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a preferred technology to detect genetic mutations with high sensitivity in small specimens. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the adequacy of EUS-FNA/FNB for NGS in pancreatic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to November 11, 2023. The primary outcome was the proportion of sufficient sample acquired by EUS-FNA/FNB in pancreatic malignancies for NGS. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of sufficient sample for NGS in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the detection rates of mutations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 and actionable mutations in PDAC. The pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated with subgroup analyses and meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies with 881 samples were included. The pooled adequacy of EUS-FNA/FNB sample for NGS was 89.9% (95% CI, 80.8%-96.7%) in pancreatic malignancies and 92.0% (95% CI, 81.3%-98.8%) in PDAC. Screening sample suitability before NGS testing was associated with lower adequacy in subgroup analysis (79.7% <i>vs.</i> 98.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.001). The pooled prevalences of mutations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in PDAC were 87.4% (95% CI, 83.2%-91.2%), 62.6% (95% CI, 53.2%-71.7%), 20.6% (95% CI, 11.9%-30.8%), and 19.4% (95% CI, 11.2%-29.1%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of potentially actionable mutations in PDAC was 14.5% (95% CI, 8.2%-22.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the majority of cases, EUS-FNA/FNB can acquire adequate sample for NGS and identify tumor-specific mutations in patients with pancreatic malignancies. Strict pre-analysis screening criteria may negatively impact the sample adequacy and the success rate for NGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"13 6","pages":"366-375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: A majority of pancreatic malignancies are unresectable at the time of presentation and require EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) for diagnosis. With the advent of precision therapy, there is an increasing need to use EUS-FNA/FNB sample for genetic analysis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a preferred technology to detect genetic mutations with high sensitivity in small specimens. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the adequacy of EUS-FNA/FNB for NGS in pancreatic malignancies.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to November 11, 2023. The primary outcome was the proportion of sufficient sample acquired by EUS-FNA/FNB in pancreatic malignancies for NGS. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of sufficient sample for NGS in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the detection rates of mutations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 and actionable mutations in PDAC. The pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated with subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

Results: Twenty studies with 881 samples were included. The pooled adequacy of EUS-FNA/FNB sample for NGS was 89.9% (95% CI, 80.8%-96.7%) in pancreatic malignancies and 92.0% (95% CI, 81.3%-98.8%) in PDAC. Screening sample suitability before NGS testing was associated with lower adequacy in subgroup analysis (79.7% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.001). The pooled prevalences of mutations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in PDAC were 87.4% (95% CI, 83.2%-91.2%), 62.6% (95% CI, 53.2%-71.7%), 20.6% (95% CI, 11.9%-30.8%), and 19.4% (95% CI, 11.2%-29.1%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of potentially actionable mutations in PDAC was 14.5% (95% CI, 8.2%-22.0%).

Conclusions: In the majority of cases, EUS-FNA/FNB can acquire adequate sample for NGS and identify tumor-specific mutations in patients with pancreatic malignancies. Strict pre-analysis screening criteria may negatively impact the sample adequacy and the success rate for NGS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景和目的:大多数胰腺恶性肿瘤在发病时无法切除,需要在 EUS 引导下进行细针穿刺或细针活检(EUS-FNA/FNB)才能确诊。随着精准治疗的出现,使用 EUS-FNA/FNB 样本进行基因分析的需求日益增加。下一代测序(NGS)是在小样本中高灵敏度检测基因突变的首选技术。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估 EUS-FNA/FNB 是否足以用于胰腺恶性肿瘤的 NGS:方法:检索了从数据库开始到 2023 年 11 月 11 日的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science。主要结果是胰腺恶性肿瘤中通过 EUS-FNA/FNB 获得足够样本用于 NGS 的比例。次要结果是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中足够样本用于 NGS 的比例,以及 PDAC 中 KRAS、TP53、CDKN2A 和 SMAD4 突变和可操作突变的检出率。汇总比例采用随机效应模型计算。通过亚组分析和元回归研究了潜在的异质性来源:结果:共纳入20项研究,881个样本。在胰腺恶性肿瘤中,用于 NGS 的 EUS-FNA/FNB 样本的合计充分率为 89.9%(95% CI,80.8%-96.7%),在 PDAC 中为 92.0%(95% CI,81.3%-98.8%)。在亚组分析中,NGS 检测前筛查样本的适宜性与较低的适宜性有关(79.7% 对 98.4%,P = 0.001)。PDAC中KRAS、TP53、CDKN2A和SMAD4突变的汇总患病率分别为87.4%(95% CI,83.2%-91.2%)、62.6%(95% CI,53.2%-71.7%)、20.6%(95% CI,11.9%-30.8%)和19.4%(95% CI,11.2%-29.1%)。PDAC中潜在可操作突变的汇总发生率为14.5%(95% CI,8.2%-22.0%):结论:在大多数情况下,EUS-FNA/FNB 可为 NGS 采集足够的样本,并鉴定胰腺恶性肿瘤患者的肿瘤特异性突变。严格的分析前筛查标准可能会对样本的充分性和 NGS 的成功率产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic efficacy of cytologic smear and pathologic histology in the differential diagnosis of distal biliary stricture via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. A suspected case of hepatic reactive lymphoid hyperplasia in which EUS-fine needle aspiration contributed to the diagnosis. Adequacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for next-generation sequencing in pancreatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A prospective comparative trial to determine the optimal number of EUS-guided fineneedle passes for successful organoid creation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Deep learning segmentation architectures for automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy samples based on whole-slide imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1