Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: retrospective observational cohort study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2024-214562
Steve Goodacre, Laura Sutton, Gordon Fuller, Ashleigh Trimble, Richard Pilbery
{"title":"Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: retrospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Steve Goodacre, Laura Sutton, Gordon Fuller, Ashleigh Trimble, Richard Pilbery","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initial ED assessment can use early warning scores to identify and prioritise patients who need time-critical treatment. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) for predicting the need for time-critical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study. We randomly selected 4000 adults who attended a tertiary hospital ED in England from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 and had NEWS2 routinely recorded on electronic patient records. The first NEWS2 and vital signs were extracted from electronic records. Research nurses selected cases that received a potentially time-critical treatment. Two independent clinical experts then determined whether time-critical treatment was or should have been received using an expert consensus derived list of interventions. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity at predefined thresholds to evaluate the accuracy of NEWS2 for predicting need for time-critical intervention and, as a secondary outcome, mortality at 7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After excluding 10 patients who received their intervention before NEWS2 recording, 164/3990 (4.1%) needed time-critical treatment and 71/3990 (1.8%) died within 7 days. NEWS2 predicted need for time-critical treatment with a c-statistic of 0.807 (95% CI 0.765 to 0.849) and death within 7 days with a c-statistic of 0.865 (95% CI 0.813, 0.917). NEWS2>4 predicted need for time-critical treatment with sensitivity of 51.8% (95% CI 44.2%, 59.3%) and positive predictive value of 25.8% (95% CI 21.3%, 30.7%). 37 of the 45 patients needing emergency surgery, antibiotics for open fractures, insulin infusion or manipulation of limb-threatening injuries had NEWS2≤4. Patients with NEWS2>4 who did not need time-critical treatment frequently scored maximum points on NEWS2 for their respiratory rate, conscious level or receiving supplemental oxygen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NEWS2 has limited accuracy for predicting need for time-critical treatment. We have identified time-critical interventions that frequently have low NEWS2 scores and NEWS2 parameters than may overestimate need for time-critical intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Research Registry 10450.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Initial ED assessment can use early warning scores to identify and prioritise patients who need time-critical treatment. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) for predicting the need for time-critical treatment.

Methods: We undertook a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study. We randomly selected 4000 adults who attended a tertiary hospital ED in England from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 and had NEWS2 routinely recorded on electronic patient records. The first NEWS2 and vital signs were extracted from electronic records. Research nurses selected cases that received a potentially time-critical treatment. Two independent clinical experts then determined whether time-critical treatment was or should have been received using an expert consensus derived list of interventions. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity at predefined thresholds to evaluate the accuracy of NEWS2 for predicting need for time-critical intervention and, as a secondary outcome, mortality at 7 days.

Results: After excluding 10 patients who received their intervention before NEWS2 recording, 164/3990 (4.1%) needed time-critical treatment and 71/3990 (1.8%) died within 7 days. NEWS2 predicted need for time-critical treatment with a c-statistic of 0.807 (95% CI 0.765 to 0.849) and death within 7 days with a c-statistic of 0.865 (95% CI 0.813, 0.917). NEWS2>4 predicted need for time-critical treatment with sensitivity of 51.8% (95% CI 44.2%, 59.3%) and positive predictive value of 25.8% (95% CI 21.3%, 30.7%). 37 of the 45 patients needing emergency surgery, antibiotics for open fractures, insulin infusion or manipulation of limb-threatening injuries had NEWS2≤4. Patients with NEWS2>4 who did not need time-critical treatment frequently scored maximum points on NEWS2 for their respiratory rate, conscious level or receiving supplemental oxygen.

Conclusion: NEWS2 has limited accuracy for predicting need for time-critical treatment. We have identified time-critical interventions that frequently have low NEWS2 scores and NEWS2 parameters than may overestimate need for time-critical intervention.

Trial registration number: Research Registry 10450.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家早期预警评分版本2 (NEWS2)在预测时间紧迫治疗需求方面的准确性:回顾性观察队列研究。
背景:初始ED评估可以使用早期预警评分来识别和优先考虑需要紧急治疗的患者。我们的目的是确定国家早期预警评分版本2 (NEWS2)在预测时间紧迫治疗需求方面的准确性。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性观察队列研究。我们随机选择了从2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日在英格兰一家三级医院急诊科就诊的4000名成年人,并在电子病历中常规记录了NEWS2。第一个NEWS2和生命体征是从电子记录中提取的。研究护士选择接受可能时间紧迫的治疗的病例。然后,两位独立的临床专家根据专家共识得出的干预措施清单,确定是否接受或应该接受时间紧迫的治疗。我们使用受试者工作特征分析和在预定义阈值下计算的敏感性和特异性来评估NEWS2预测时间关键干预需求的准确性,以及作为次要结局的7天死亡率。结果:排除10例在NEWS2记录前接受干预的患者后,164/3990(4.1%)需要及时治疗,71/3990(1.8%)在7天内死亡。NEWS2预测患者需要紧急治疗,c-统计量为0.807 (95% CI 0.765 ~ 0.849), 7天内死亡,c-统计量为0.865 (95% CI 0.813, 0.917)。NEWS2 bbbb4预测需要及时治疗的敏感性为51.8% (95% CI 44.2%, 59.3%),阳性预测值为25.8% (95% CI 21.3%, 30.7%)。45例需要急诊手术、开放性骨折抗生素治疗、胰岛素输注或肢体威胁损伤操作的患者中,有37例NEWS2≤4。不需要时间紧迫治疗的NEWS2患者在NEWS2上的呼吸频率、意识水平或接受补充氧气的情况下往往得分最高。结论:NEWS2在预测时间紧迫治疗需求方面的准确性有限。我们已经确定了时间关键型干预通常具有较低的NEWS2分数和NEWS2参数,而不是可能高估时间关键型干预的需求。试验注册号:Research Registry 10450。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Prehospital vital sign abnormalities and in-hospital outcomes in children. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound of the posterior fatpad in elbow fractures. Are there differences in low-acuity emergency department visits between culturally and linguistically diverse migrants and people with English-speaking background: a population-based linkage study of adults over 45. Is it time to reframe resuscitation in trauma? Best evidence topic report: can intradermal sterile water injections provide effective pain relief in patients with renal colic?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1