Assessing the impact of different solvents in the bacterial reverse mutation test.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/em.22649
Satyam N Patel, Chetan K Kajavadara, Rushikesh M Shukla, Darshan T Valani, Laxit K Bhatt, Rajesh Sundar, Mukul R Jain
{"title":"Assessing the impact of different solvents in the bacterial reverse mutation test.","authors":"Satyam N Patel, Chetan K Kajavadara, Rushikesh M Shukla, Darshan T Valani, Laxit K Bhatt, Rajesh Sundar, Mukul R Jain","doi":"10.1002/em.22649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bacterial reverse mutation test is essential for identifying the mutagenic potential of chemicals. The solubility of the test substance is vital for achieving the recommended assay concentration. Preferred solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide and water are chosen for their compatibility and historical data. Selecting a compatible solvent with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA strains, considering a maximum cytotoxic concentration or the limit of 5 mg/plate, can be challenging. This study assessed various solvents, including N,N-dimethylformamide, acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, 95% ethanol, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, methanol, P-dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, and dimethylacetamide, as alternative solvents in the AMES test. Results showed all solvents, except tetrahydrofuran, were compatible at concentrations up to 100 μL/plate or more, as they did not inhibit S9 enzymes, bacterial growth, or alter bacterial revertant colony counts, making them suitable for the bacterial reverse mutation test.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bacterial reverse mutation test is essential for identifying the mutagenic potential of chemicals. The solubility of the test substance is vital for achieving the recommended assay concentration. Preferred solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide and water are chosen for their compatibility and historical data. Selecting a compatible solvent with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA strains, considering a maximum cytotoxic concentration or the limit of 5 mg/plate, can be challenging. This study assessed various solvents, including N,N-dimethylformamide, acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, 95% ethanol, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, methanol, P-dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, and dimethylacetamide, as alternative solvents in the AMES test. Results showed all solvents, except tetrahydrofuran, were compatible at concentrations up to 100 μL/plate or more, as they did not inhibit S9 enzymes, bacterial growth, or alter bacterial revertant colony counts, making them suitable for the bacterial reverse mutation test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同溶剂对细菌反向突变试验的影响。
细菌反向突变试验是鉴定化学物质致突变潜能的必要手段。测试物质的溶解度对于达到推荐的测定浓度至关重要。首选的溶剂,如二甲亚砜和水的选择,他们的相容性和历史数据。考虑到最大细胞毒性浓度或5 mg/板的限制,选择与鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌WP2 uvrA菌株相容的溶剂可能具有挑战性。本研究评估了各种溶剂,包括N、N-二甲基甲酰胺、丙酮、乙腈、乙酸乙酯、95%乙醇、二甘醇单甲醚、甲醇、对二恶烷、四氢呋喃和二甲基乙酰胺,作为AMES试验中的替代溶剂。结果表明,除四氢呋喃外,所有溶剂在浓度为100 μL/平板或更高时都是相容的,因为它们不会抑制S9酶,细菌生长或改变细菌逆转菌落计数,使其适合于细菌反向突变试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic Modifications Associated With Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Firefighting. Review and meta-analysis of gene expression biomarkers predictive of chemical-induced genotoxicity in vivo. Assessing the impact of different solvents in the bacterial reverse mutation test. Consensus findings of an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing workshop on using transcriptomic biomarkers to predict genotoxicity. Machine learning enhances genotoxicity assessment using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1