Use of design thinking to develop a benchmarking tool to assess documentation procedures in a hospital pharmacy aseptic compounding unit: a case study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004178
Noelle Murphy, Evelyn Garvey, Bernard D Naughton
{"title":"Use of design thinking to develop a benchmarking tool to assess documentation procedures in a hospital pharmacy aseptic compounding unit: a case study.","authors":"Noelle Murphy, Evelyn Garvey, Bernard D Naughton","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper combines the concepts of design thinking and benchmarking in an aseptic manufacturing context. Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that aims to understand user needs, generate ideas, prototypes and test solutions. There are no published examples in the Irish healthcare setting. There are also no national legislative frameworks in Ireland for compounding medicine in unlicensed hospital aseptic compounding units (ACUs). This study aims to apply design thinking principles to the development of a benchmarking process in the absence of existing frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review of design thinking research and international best practice guidelines regarding sterile product manufacture documentation was undertaken to develop an initial prototype benchmarking tool. Design thinking principles were implemented by recruiting and empathising with key senior stakeholders (N=5). Semistructured interviews were conducted with these stakeholders to aid the defining, ideation and optimisation of the prototype tool. The optimised tool was then prototyped and tested in practice by end users (N=11), within an Irish ACU. End users were interviewed regarding their experience of using the tool. Transcripts of interviews were coded, and thematic analysis was undertaken to generate overarching themes to support its further development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The design thinking approach enabled the development of a benchmarking tool, which was optimised by empathising with key stakeholders. Through the process of empathising, defining, ideation, prototyping and testing, a useful benchmarking tool was developed which was deemed appropriate and accepted by its users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Design thinking provides a platform for collaboration to deliver innovation and drive quality improvement in healthcare settings. The design thinking process was successful in delivering a user-centred tool for documentation procedures in an aseptic unit, which was accepted for use by end users. When exisiting guidleines and regulations are considered, design thinking shows promise as an innovation tool in Irish aseptic units, manufacturing facilities and the wider healthcare context.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This paper combines the concepts of design thinking and benchmarking in an aseptic manufacturing context. Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that aims to understand user needs, generate ideas, prototypes and test solutions. There are no published examples in the Irish healthcare setting. There are also no national legislative frameworks in Ireland for compounding medicine in unlicensed hospital aseptic compounding units (ACUs). This study aims to apply design thinking principles to the development of a benchmarking process in the absence of existing frameworks.

Methods: A literature review of design thinking research and international best practice guidelines regarding sterile product manufacture documentation was undertaken to develop an initial prototype benchmarking tool. Design thinking principles were implemented by recruiting and empathising with key senior stakeholders (N=5). Semistructured interviews were conducted with these stakeholders to aid the defining, ideation and optimisation of the prototype tool. The optimised tool was then prototyped and tested in practice by end users (N=11), within an Irish ACU. End users were interviewed regarding their experience of using the tool. Transcripts of interviews were coded, and thematic analysis was undertaken to generate overarching themes to support its further development.

Results: The design thinking approach enabled the development of a benchmarking tool, which was optimised by empathising with key stakeholders. Through the process of empathising, defining, ideation, prototyping and testing, a useful benchmarking tool was developed which was deemed appropriate and accepted by its users.

Conclusions: Design thinking provides a platform for collaboration to deliver innovation and drive quality improvement in healthcare settings. The design thinking process was successful in delivering a user-centred tool for documentation procedures in an aseptic unit, which was accepted for use by end users. When exisiting guidleines and regulations are considered, design thinking shows promise as an innovation tool in Irish aseptic units, manufacturing facilities and the wider healthcare context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用设计思维开发基准工具以评估医院药房无菌配制部门的文件编制程序:案例研究。
目的:本文结合了无菌生产环境中设计思维和标杆管理的概念。设计思维是一种解决问题的方法,旨在了解用户需求,产生想法,原型和测试解决方案。在爱尔兰的医疗环境中没有公开的例子。爱尔兰也没有针对无执照医院无菌配制单位(acu)配制药物的国家立法框架。本研究旨在将设计思维原则应用于在缺乏现有框架的情况下制定基准过程。方法:对无菌产品生产文件的设计思维研究和国际最佳实践指南进行文献回顾,以开发一个初始原型基准工具。设计思维原则通过招募和同情关键的高级利益相关者来实施(N=5)。与这些利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,以帮助定义、构思和优化原型工具。然后,在爱尔兰ACU中,最终用户(N=11)对优化后的工具进行了原型设计和实践测试。最终用户就他们使用该工具的体验进行了访谈。访谈笔录已编码,并进行专题分析,以产生支持进一步发展的总体主题。结果:设计思维方法使基准工具的开发成为可能,该工具通过与关键利益相关者的共情而得到优化。通过移情、定义、构思、原型和测试的过程,一个有用的基准测试工具被开发出来,并被用户认为是合适的和接受的。结论:设计思维为协作提供了一个平台,从而在医疗保健环境中实现创新并推动质量改进。设计思维过程成功地提供了一个以用户为中心的工具,用于无菌装置的文档程序,并被最终用户接受使用。考虑到现有的指导方针和法规,设计思维在爱尔兰无菌单位、生产设施和更广泛的医疗保健环境中显示出作为创新工具的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular events in EGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib. Influence of volume and citrate on perceived pain in patients treated with adalimumab. Monitoring of occupational exposure to hazardous medicinal products in robotic compounding. Feasibility study of the digital tool Max for the patient-provided medication list in the medication reconciliation process prior to hospitalisation: patient willingness and usability, time saved and reliability. Physical compatibility of insulin aspart, lidocaine, alprostadil and vancomycin with individualised two-in-one parenteral nutrition used in the neonatal intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1