Coronary artery calcification severity in long term breast cancer survivors treated with isolated contemporary radiotherapy: Relation to dose and CV risk factors

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111909
Pauline Krug , Xavier Geets , Martine Berlière , François Duhoux , Christophe Beauloye , Agnès Pasquet , David Vancraeynest , Anne-Catherine Pouleur , Bernhard L. Gerber , FESC FACC FAHA
{"title":"Coronary artery calcification severity in long term breast cancer survivors treated with isolated contemporary radiotherapy: Relation to dose and CV risk factors","authors":"Pauline Krug ,&nbsp;Xavier Geets ,&nbsp;Martine Berlière ,&nbsp;François Duhoux ,&nbsp;Christophe Beauloye ,&nbsp;Agnès Pasquet ,&nbsp;David Vancraeynest ,&nbsp;Anne-Catherine Pouleur ,&nbsp;Bernhard L. Gerber ,&nbsp;FESC FACC FAHA","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ancillary breast cancer (BC) radiation therapy (RT), particularly associated with chemotherapy, increases the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, it remains unclear whether this risk also applies to isolated contemporary radiotherapy without chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seventy-five BC patients (35 left-sided and 40 right-sided) treated with RT and available dosimetry, prospectively underwent Agatston calcium score (CAC) and coronary CT angiography (CTCA) a median of 11 ± 1 years later and were compared to 75 age- and cardiovascular (CV) risk factor-matched female controls without a history of cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>BC patients and controls had similar ages (62 ± 7 vs. 61 ± 7 years, p = 0.63), CV risk factors and estimated Score2/OP risk (3.8 % IQR 2.6–6 vs. 3.3 % IQR 2.3–5.4, p = 0.52). CAC scores (0 IQR 0–79 vs. 0 IQR 0–34, p = 0.62) and age-predicted percentile CAC scores (p = 0.61) were similar between BC patients and controls, with no significant difference between left- and right-sided RT. Multivariable analysis revealed that CAC scores in BC patients were predicted only by a family history of CAD and by Score-2/OP risk, but not by cardiac radiation exposure. By CTCA 68 % of BC patients had no or very mild coronary disease, and only 14 % had more than moderate stenosis (&gt;50 %), which was predicted by CAC scores &gt; 79 (AUC = 0.97).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Eleven years post-treatment with isolated contemporary RT for BC, patients exhibited similar CAC severity as age- and risk factor-matched controls. CAC was associated only with CV risk factors, but not radiation dose, suggesting contemporary RT for BC is not linked to higher subclinical CAD prevalence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24006259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ancillary breast cancer (BC) radiation therapy (RT), particularly associated with chemotherapy, increases the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, it remains unclear whether this risk also applies to isolated contemporary radiotherapy without chemotherapy.

Methods

Seventy-five BC patients (35 left-sided and 40 right-sided) treated with RT and available dosimetry, prospectively underwent Agatston calcium score (CAC) and coronary CT angiography (CTCA) a median of 11 ± 1 years later and were compared to 75 age- and cardiovascular (CV) risk factor-matched female controls without a history of cancer.

Results

BC patients and controls had similar ages (62 ± 7 vs. 61 ± 7 years, p = 0.63), CV risk factors and estimated Score2/OP risk (3.8 % IQR 2.6–6 vs. 3.3 % IQR 2.3–5.4, p = 0.52). CAC scores (0 IQR 0–79 vs. 0 IQR 0–34, p = 0.62) and age-predicted percentile CAC scores (p = 0.61) were similar between BC patients and controls, with no significant difference between left- and right-sided RT. Multivariable analysis revealed that CAC scores in BC patients were predicted only by a family history of CAD and by Score-2/OP risk, but not by cardiac radiation exposure. By CTCA 68 % of BC patients had no or very mild coronary disease, and only 14 % had more than moderate stenosis (>50 %), which was predicted by CAC scores > 79 (AUC = 0.97).

Conclusion

Eleven years post-treatment with isolated contemporary RT for BC, patients exhibited similar CAC severity as age- and risk factor-matched controls. CAC was associated only with CV risk factors, but not radiation dose, suggesting contemporary RT for BC is not linked to higher subclinical CAD prevalence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受孤立当代放射治疗的长期乳腺癌幸存者冠状动脉钙化严重程度:与剂量和CV危险因素的关系
背景:辅助乳腺癌(BC)放射治疗(RT),特别是与化疗相关,增加冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的风险。然而,尚不清楚这种风险是否也适用于不加化疗的孤立当代放疗。方法:75例BC患者(35例左侧和40例右侧)接受RT和可用剂量法治疗,在中位11±1年后进行Agatston钙评分(CAC)和冠状动脉CT血管造影(CTCA),并与75例年龄和心血管(CV)危险因素匹配的无癌症史的女性对照进行比较。结果:BC患者和对照组具有相似的年龄(62±7岁vs 61±7岁,p = 0.63)、CV危险因素和Score2/OP估计风险(3.8% IQR 2.6-6 vs 3.3% IQR 2.3-5.4, p = 0.52)。CAC评分(0 IQR 0-79 vs 0 IQR 0-34, p = 0.62)和年龄预测百分位数CAC评分(p = 0.61)在BC患者和对照组之间相似,左右侧rt之间无显著差异。多变量分析显示,BC患者的CAC评分仅由CAD家族史和Score-2/OP风险预测,而与心脏辐射暴露无关。到CTCA时,68%的BC患者没有或非常轻微的冠状动脉疾病,只有14%的患者有中度以上的狭窄(bbb50 %),这是由CAC评分bbb79 (AUC = 0.97)预测的。结论:接受孤立的BC当代RT治疗11年后,患者的CAC严重程度与年龄和危险因素匹配的对照组相似。CAC仅与心血管危险因素相关,而与辐射剂量无关,这表明当代BC放疗与亚临床CAD患病率升高无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing lower extremity CT angiography: A prospective study of individualized vs. fixed post-trigger delays in bolus tracking Automated segmentation by SCA-UNet can be directly used for radiomics diagnosis of thymic epithelial tumors Analysis of clinical and imaging characteristics of pseudocirrhosis in breast cancer liver metastasis A “novel” MRI sequence for improving conspicuity and detection of hemorrhagic foci in pelvic endometriosis: Technical note Prediction of microsatellite-stable/epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition molecular subtype gastric cancer using CT radiomics and clinicopathologic factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1