Introduction of molecular point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2 in a triage unit of a large maternity hospital: An evaluation of staff experiences

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious diseases now Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105024
M. Howarth-Maddison , I.N. Okoliegbe , N. El Sakka
{"title":"Introduction of molecular point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2 in a triage unit of a large maternity hospital: An evaluation of staff experiences","authors":"M. Howarth-Maddison ,&nbsp;I.N. Okoliegbe ,&nbsp;N. El Sakka","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Recent advances in the development of rapid SARS-CoV-2 point of care (POC) testing provided an opportunity to aid clinical decision making in front-line healthcare settings. Perspectives of POC COVID-19 screening of pregnant women are under-researched.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the impact of a SARS-CoV-2 POC testing platform implemented in a busy maternity hospital, with limited isolation capacity, during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a before and after comparison of two consecutive 12-month periods and a retrospective evaluation of staff attitudes and POC test acceptance. Turnaround Time (TAT) and testing numbers were assessed by computer audit. Qualitative data was collected using confidential questionnaires.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean TAT for the POC platform was 5.3x quicker (p &lt; 0.001, chi-square test) when compared with local virus laboratory PCR testing. Samples sent for laboratory testing reduced by almost one third, following introduction of the POC device. A total of 27 staff members completed a POC testing satisfaction survey, which documented ease of use and benefits for diagnosis assistance, patient management and patient experience.</div><div>Conclusion.</div><div>In this single-center maternity setting, POC testing decreased laboratory testing volume and SARS-Cov-2 result TAT for symptomatic women and those awaiting crucial investigations. POC COVID-19 investigation was deemed acceptable by the clinical team for facilitating patient placement, management, and use of limited isolation capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"55 2","pages":"Article 105024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266699192500003X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Recent advances in the development of rapid SARS-CoV-2 point of care (POC) testing provided an opportunity to aid clinical decision making in front-line healthcare settings. Perspectives of POC COVID-19 screening of pregnant women are under-researched.

Objective

To assess the impact of a SARS-CoV-2 POC testing platform implemented in a busy maternity hospital, with limited isolation capacity, during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a before and after comparison of two consecutive 12-month periods and a retrospective evaluation of staff attitudes and POC test acceptance. Turnaround Time (TAT) and testing numbers were assessed by computer audit. Qualitative data was collected using confidential questionnaires.

Results

Mean TAT for the POC platform was 5.3x quicker (p < 0.001, chi-square test) when compared with local virus laboratory PCR testing. Samples sent for laboratory testing reduced by almost one third, following introduction of the POC device. A total of 27 staff members completed a POC testing satisfaction survey, which documented ease of use and benefits for diagnosis assistance, patient management and patient experience.
Conclusion.
In this single-center maternity setting, POC testing decreased laboratory testing volume and SARS-Cov-2 result TAT for symptomatic women and those awaiting crucial investigations. POC COVID-19 investigation was deemed acceptable by the clinical team for facilitating patient placement, management, and use of limited isolation capacity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一家大型妇产医院的分诊单元引入SARS-CoV-2的分子护理点检测:对工作人员经验的评估
背景:最近,SARS-CoV-2 快速护理点(POC)检测技术的发展为一线医疗机构的临床决策提供了帮助。对孕妇进行 POC COVID-19 筛查的前景研究不足:目的:评估 COVID-19 第三波流行期间,在一家繁忙且隔离能力有限的妇产医院实施的 SARS-CoV-2 POC 检测平台的影响:方法:我们对连续两个 12 个月期间进行了前后对比,并对员工的态度和 POC 检测的接受程度进行了回顾性评估。通过计算机审计评估了周转时间(TAT)和检测次数。使用保密问卷收集定性数据:结果:POC 平台的平均周转时间快了 5.3 倍(p 结论:POC 平台的平均周转时间快了 5.3 倍:在这个单中心产科机构中,POC 检验减少了实验室检验量,并缩短了有症状妇女和等待重要检查妇女的 SARS-Cov-2 检验结果的等待时间。临床团队认为,POC COVID-19 检测可为患者安置、管理和利用有限的隔离能力提供便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Update of guidelines for management of community acquired pneumonia in adults by the French infectious disease society (SPILF) and the French-speaking society of respiratory diseases (SPLF). Endorsed by the French intensive care society (SRLF), the French microbiology society (SFM), the French radiology society (SFR) and the French emergency society (SFMU). Clinical, biological, metabolic, and immune changes associated with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in people living with HIV Culture yield of 1st and 2nd biopsy in bacterial non-mycobacterial spondylodiscitis in a university hospital Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on the appropriate use of carbapenems in a French university hospital (CARBACAI study) Partner treatment strategies for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: Time for a reappraisal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1