Jason A. Blake, D. Leann Long, Amy J. Knight, Burel R. Goodin, Michael Crowe, Suzanne E. Judd, J. David Rhodes, Olivio J. Clay
{"title":"Caregiver Psychosocial Factors & Stroke Survivor Cognitive Outcomes: A REGARDS-CARES Cohort Study","authors":"Jason A. Blake, D. Leann Long, Amy J. Knight, Burel R. Goodin, Michael Crowe, Suzanne E. Judd, J. David Rhodes, Olivio J. Clay","doi":"10.1002/gps.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Caring for an individual with cognitive impairment carries a physical, mental, and emotional toll. This manuscript examines the relationship between caregiver psychosocial measures and longitudinal cognitive outcomes of stroke survivors, as well as analyzing the psychosocial factors as moderators of stroke severity and cognition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This analysis was conducted on caregiver and stroke survivor dyads (<i>n</i> = 157) that participated in the Caring for Adults Recovering from the Effects of Stroke (CARES) project, an ancillary study of the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) national cohort study. Stroke severity at hospitalization discharge was included as the primary predictor of cognitive outcomes and caregiver psychosocial factors were included as additional predictors. Cognition was assessed biennially and measured the domains of learning, memory, and executive functioning. Individual mixed-effect models included each psychosocial factor and were covariate-adjusted for pre-stroke cognitive scores and demographic variables. Caregiver psychosocial factors included caregiver strain, depressive symptoms, life and leisure time satisfaction, and overall quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Decreased caregiver strain (<i>b</i> = −0.230, 95% CI: −0.39 to −0.07; <i>p</i> = 0.006) and increased leisure time satisfaction (<i>b</i> = 0.045, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.08; <i>p</i> = 0.005) were both found to be significant predictors, alongside stroke severity (<i>b</i> = −0.137, 95% CI: −0.22 to −0.05; <i>p</i> = 0.002), of better stroke survivor cognition overall. No variables were found to be moderating factors of the relationship between stroke severity and cognition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the caregiver psychosocial factors that predict stroke outcomes will help clinicians to identify stroke survivor and caregiver dyads at higher risk for worst longitudinal cognitive outcomes following stroke.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Caring for an individual with cognitive impairment carries a physical, mental, and emotional toll. This manuscript examines the relationship between caregiver psychosocial measures and longitudinal cognitive outcomes of stroke survivors, as well as analyzing the psychosocial factors as moderators of stroke severity and cognition.
Methods
This analysis was conducted on caregiver and stroke survivor dyads (n = 157) that participated in the Caring for Adults Recovering from the Effects of Stroke (CARES) project, an ancillary study of the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) national cohort study. Stroke severity at hospitalization discharge was included as the primary predictor of cognitive outcomes and caregiver psychosocial factors were included as additional predictors. Cognition was assessed biennially and measured the domains of learning, memory, and executive functioning. Individual mixed-effect models included each psychosocial factor and were covariate-adjusted for pre-stroke cognitive scores and demographic variables. Caregiver psychosocial factors included caregiver strain, depressive symptoms, life and leisure time satisfaction, and overall quality of life.
Results
Decreased caregiver strain (b = −0.230, 95% CI: −0.39 to −0.07; p = 0.006) and increased leisure time satisfaction (b = 0.045, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.08; p = 0.005) were both found to be significant predictors, alongside stroke severity (b = −0.137, 95% CI: −0.22 to −0.05; p = 0.002), of better stroke survivor cognition overall. No variables were found to be moderating factors of the relationship between stroke severity and cognition.
Conclusions
Understanding the caregiver psychosocial factors that predict stroke outcomes will help clinicians to identify stroke survivor and caregiver dyads at higher risk for worst longitudinal cognitive outcomes following stroke.
期刊介绍:
The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers.
The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.