The Surgical Pause: The Importance of Measuring Frailty and Taking Action to Address Identified Frailty.

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.011
Daniel E Hall, Danielle Hagan, LauraEllen Ashcraft, Mark Wilson, Shipra Arya, Jason M Johanning
{"title":"The Surgical Pause: The Importance of Measuring Frailty and Taking Action to Address Identified Frailty.","authors":"Daniel E Hall, Danielle Hagan, LauraEllen Ashcraft, Mark Wilson, Shipra Arya, Jason M Johanning","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Conceptual framework: </strong>The Surgical Pause is a rapid, scalable strategy for health care systems to optimize perioperative outcomes for high-risk, frail patients considering elective surgery. The first and most important step is to screen for frailty, thereby identifying the 5% to 10% of patients at most risk for postoperative complications, loss of independence, institutionalization, and mortality. The second step is to take action to improve outcomes. Action may include clarifying perioperative goals, optimizing perioperative decision-making, and mitigating frailty-associated risks through prehabilitation.</p><p><strong>History of dissemination: </strong>Initially implemented at the Omaha Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center in 2012, the Surgical Pause was associated with a nearly three-fold survival advantage among the frail. The program was subsequently replicated at more than 50 VA and private sector hospitals with similarly robust results, leading the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Surgery Office to formally adopt the program in January 2024. The Joint Commission and the National Quality Forum recognized the program with the Eisenberg Award for Patient Safety and Quality at the National Level.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Successful dissemination grew from simultaneous real-world quality projects paralleled by rigorous, high-quality, peer reviewed publications demonstrating the need for and impact of the Surgical Pause. Adoption was facilitated in an iterative process to streamline feasibility and leverage existing resources. Success was accelerated by national infrastructure catalyzing a community of practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Surgical Pause is changing surgical culture by proactively identifying frail patients, aligning treatment plans with patient-defined goals, optimizing perioperative decisions, and mitigating frailty-associated risks to deliver both quality and value.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conceptual framework: The Surgical Pause is a rapid, scalable strategy for health care systems to optimize perioperative outcomes for high-risk, frail patients considering elective surgery. The first and most important step is to screen for frailty, thereby identifying the 5% to 10% of patients at most risk for postoperative complications, loss of independence, institutionalization, and mortality. The second step is to take action to improve outcomes. Action may include clarifying perioperative goals, optimizing perioperative decision-making, and mitigating frailty-associated risks through prehabilitation.

History of dissemination: Initially implemented at the Omaha Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center in 2012, the Surgical Pause was associated with a nearly three-fold survival advantage among the frail. The program was subsequently replicated at more than 50 VA and private sector hospitals with similarly robust results, leading the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Surgery Office to formally adopt the program in January 2024. The Joint Commission and the National Quality Forum recognized the program with the Eisenberg Award for Patient Safety and Quality at the National Level.

Lessons learned: Successful dissemination grew from simultaneous real-world quality projects paralleled by rigorous, high-quality, peer reviewed publications demonstrating the need for and impact of the Surgical Pause. Adoption was facilitated in an iterative process to streamline feasibility and leverage existing resources. Success was accelerated by national infrastructure catalyzing a community of practice.

Conclusion: The Surgical Pause is changing surgical culture by proactively identifying frail patients, aligning treatment plans with patient-defined goals, optimizing perioperative decisions, and mitigating frailty-associated risks to deliver both quality and value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术暂停:衡量虚弱程度并采取行动解决已发现的虚弱问题的重要性。
概念框架:手术暂停是一种快速的、可扩展的策略,用于卫生保健系统优化高危、体弱患者考虑择期手术的围手术期结果。第一步也是最重要的一步是筛查虚弱,从而确定5%至10%的患者术后并发症、丧失独立性、住院和死亡的风险最大。第二步是采取行动改善结果。行动可能包括明确围手术期目标,优化围手术期决策,并通过康复减轻虚弱相关风险。传播历史:奥马哈退伍军人事务(VA)医疗中心最初于2012年实施手术暂停,在体弱者中具有近三倍的生存优势。随后,该项目在50多家退伍军人管理局和私营部门医院得到了同样强劲的效果,导致退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)国家外科办公室于2024年1月正式采用该项目。联合委员会和国家质量论坛在国家层面上为该项目颁发了艾森伯格患者安全和质量奖。经验教训:成功的传播来自于同时进行的真实世界高质量项目,以及严谨、高质量、同行评审的出版物,这些出版物证明了手术暂停的必要性和影响。在一个简化可行性和利用现有资源的迭代过程中促进了采用。国家基础设施促进了实践社区的形成,加速了成功的进程。结论:外科暂停正在改变手术文化,通过主动识别虚弱患者,调整治疗计划与患者定义的目标,优化围手术期决策,减轻虚弱相关风险,以提供质量和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Examining Patient Safety Events Using the Behaviour Change Wheel: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Prevention of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections by Leadership Focus on Process Measures Implementation of the Revised American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hyperbilirubinemia Decreases Necessity for Serum Bilirubin and Phototherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1