Cristiano Spadaccio, Antonio Salsano, Salah Altarabsheh, Alejandra Castro-Varela, Carlos Gallego Navarro, Fernando Juarez Casso, Ahmed Abdelrehim, Kartik Andi, Rafaela V P Ribeiro, Kukbin Choi, Gustavo Knop, Cassie C Kennedy, Kelly M Pennington, Philip J Spencer, Richard Daly, Mauricio Villavicencio, Marcelo Cypel, Sahar A Saddoughi
{"title":"Short and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation from brain death vs. circulatory death donors: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.","authors":"Cristiano Spadaccio, Antonio Salsano, Salah Altarabsheh, Alejandra Castro-Varela, Carlos Gallego Navarro, Fernando Juarez Casso, Ahmed Abdelrehim, Kartik Andi, Rafaela V P Ribeiro, Kukbin Choi, Gustavo Knop, Cassie C Kennedy, Kelly M Pennington, Philip J Spencer, Richard Daly, Mauricio Villavicencio, Marcelo Cypel, Sahar A Saddoughi","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search (terms \"lung transplantation\" AND \"donation after circulatory death\") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx).
Methods: Literature search (terms "lung transplantation" AND "donation after circulatory death") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated.
Results: 21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I2=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.