Short and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation from brain death vs. circulatory death donors: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.010
Cristiano Spadaccio, Antonio Salsano, Salah Altarabsheh, Alejandra Castro-Varela, Carlos Gallego Navarro, Fernando Juarez Casso, Ahmed Abdelrehim, Kartik Andi, Rafaela V P Ribeiro, Kukbin Choi, Gustavo Knop, Cassie C Kennedy, Kelly M Pennington, Philip J Spencer, Richard Daly, Mauricio Villavicencio, Marcelo Cypel, Sahar A Saddoughi
{"title":"Short and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation from brain death vs. circulatory death donors: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.","authors":"Cristiano Spadaccio, Antonio Salsano, Salah Altarabsheh, Alejandra Castro-Varela, Carlos Gallego Navarro, Fernando Juarez Casso, Ahmed Abdelrehim, Kartik Andi, Rafaela V P Ribeiro, Kukbin Choi, Gustavo Knop, Cassie C Kennedy, Kelly M Pennington, Philip J Spencer, Richard Daly, Mauricio Villavicencio, Marcelo Cypel, Sahar A Saddoughi","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search (terms \"lung transplantation\" AND \"donation after circulatory death\") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx).

Methods: Literature search (terms "lung transplantation" AND "donation after circulatory death") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated.

Results: 21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I2=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑死亡与循环死亡供者肺移植的短期和长期结果:比较研究的荟萃分析
目的:通过比较研究的荟萃分析,探讨供体类型(脑死亡DBD vs循环死亡DCD)对肺移植(LTx)短期和长期结局的影响。方法:文献检索(术语“肺移植”和“循环性死亡后捐赠”)进行到2022年7月,并选择比较DCD和DBD LTx结果的研究。主要终点是早期和长期死亡率。次要结局包括原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)、急性排斥反应和术后并发症。通过检索每个可用的Kaplan-Meier数据分析长期生存,并估计DBD和DCD之间长期生存的限制平均生存时间差。结果:21项研究纳入60105例患者(DBD=58548, DCD=1557)。受体和供体的基线特征在两组之间相似。未观察到显著的发表偏倚。早期死亡率的合并优势比倾向于DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00,I2=0%)。急性排斥反应发生风险(OR=1.33,CI=0.82-2.17)、PGD分级2-3级(OR=0.88,CI=0.69-1.13)差异无统计学意义。DBD组和DCD组的1年和5年生存率分别为82.1%和51.2%,86.2%和62.7% (Log-rank,p)结论:DCD和DBD比较研究的荟萃分析显示,DCD LTx的长期生存优势显著,尽管最初的短期死亡风险很小,但具有统计学意义。数据支持继续实施DCD以增加肺供体池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of riociguat in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and cardiometabolic comorbidities: Data from interventional clinical trials. Vintage vitality: Embracing older donor lungs for transplants. A perspective on the added value of red blood cells during cardiac hypothermic oxygenated perfusion. Loss of Nr4a1 ameliorates endothelial cell injury and vascular leakage in lung transplantation from circulatory-death donor. Early stroke following durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs National Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1