Empathy Unmasked: Patient Perception of Physician Empathy in an Oncologic Emergency Setting. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Personal Protective Equipment Wear versus Unmasked Video Communication

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.005
Kathryn J. Burk MD , John J. Stroh MD , Kelly Larkin MD , Patrick Chaftari MD , Denise M. Langabeer PhD , Jazmin R. Menendez BS , Jeanie F. Woodruff BS , Jan Hargrave EdS , Hongxu Zhu MS , James P. Long PhD , Sai-Ching J. Yeung MD, PhD , Kumar Alagappan MD , Aiham Qdaisat MD, MS
{"title":"Empathy Unmasked: Patient Perception of Physician Empathy in an Oncologic Emergency Setting. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Personal Protective Equipment Wear versus Unmasked Video Communication","authors":"Kathryn J. Burk MD ,&nbsp;John J. Stroh MD ,&nbsp;Kelly Larkin MD ,&nbsp;Patrick Chaftari MD ,&nbsp;Denise M. Langabeer PhD ,&nbsp;Jazmin R. Menendez BS ,&nbsp;Jeanie F. Woodruff BS ,&nbsp;Jan Hargrave EdS ,&nbsp;Hongxu Zhu MS ,&nbsp;James P. Long PhD ,&nbsp;Sai-Ching J. Yeung MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kumar Alagappan MD ,&nbsp;Aiham Qdaisat MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine emerged as an important option that supports and facilitates clinical practice, however, its usefulness in emergency settings that treat patients with cancer is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate patient perception of physician empathy in an emergency oncology setting, comparing video interaction to an in-person with personal protective equipment (PPE) approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, survey-based randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized 1:1 for the concluding conversation done in-person which included either interacting with physicians wearing PPE or video interaction with physicians without PPE (virtual). Patients’ perceptions of the physicians’ relational empathy were assessed and compared for each group by using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure and the Perception of Physician Compassion measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients (n = 106) in both the PPE and virtual arms provided favorable responses to all questions. The mean overall CARE scores for the PPE and virtual arms were 45.02 and 44.43, respectively (difference, 0.58 [95% CI: -2.10, 3.30]). Regarding the linear physician compassion scores, patients in the virtual arm appeared to consider physicians to be warmer (difference, -0.42 [95% CI: -0.87, 0.04]) but less pleasant (difference, 0.33 [95% CI: -0.40, 1.10]) than did patients in the PPE arm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cancer patients presenting to the emergency department perceive empathy and compassion equally when approached by physicians virtually without PPE or in person while wearing PPE. Virtual services for specific aspects of clinical practice during emergency department visits in an oncology setting can be implemented to ensure safer interactions between patients and physicians without compromising the physician-patient relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine emerged as an important option that supports and facilitates clinical practice, however, its usefulness in emergency settings that treat patients with cancer is unclear.

Objective

To evaluate patient perception of physician empathy in an emergency oncology setting, comparing video interaction to an in-person with personal protective equipment (PPE) approach.

Methods

In this single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, survey-based randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized 1:1 for the concluding conversation done in-person which included either interacting with physicians wearing PPE or video interaction with physicians without PPE (virtual). Patients’ perceptions of the physicians’ relational empathy were assessed and compared for each group by using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure and the Perception of Physician Compassion measure.

Results

Patients (n = 106) in both the PPE and virtual arms provided favorable responses to all questions. The mean overall CARE scores for the PPE and virtual arms were 45.02 and 44.43, respectively (difference, 0.58 [95% CI: -2.10, 3.30]). Regarding the linear physician compassion scores, patients in the virtual arm appeared to consider physicians to be warmer (difference, -0.42 [95% CI: -0.87, 0.04]) but less pleasant (difference, 0.33 [95% CI: -0.40, 1.10]) than did patients in the PPE arm.

Conclusions

Cancer patients presenting to the emergency department perceive empathy and compassion equally when approached by physicians virtually without PPE or in person while wearing PPE. Virtual services for specific aspects of clinical practice during emergency department visits in an oncology setting can be implemented to ensure safer interactions between patients and physicians without compromising the physician-patient relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共情揭露:肿瘤紧急情况下患者对医生共情的感知。一项比较个人防护装备佩戴与未蒙面视频通信的随机对照试验。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程医疗成为支持和促进临床实践的重要选择,然而,其在治疗癌症患者的紧急情况下的实用性尚不清楚。目的:评估急诊肿瘤科患者对医生共情的感知,将视频互动与带着个人防护装备(PPE)的面对面方式进行比较。方法:在这项单中心、前瞻性、横断面、基于调查的随机对照试验中,患者以1:1的比例随机分组,进行面对面的结论性对话,包括与佩戴防护装备的医生进行互动,或与不佩戴防护装备的医生进行视频互动(虚拟)。采用咨询与关系共情(CARE)量表和医生同情感知量表,评估和比较各组患者对医生关系共情的感知。结果:使用PPE和虚拟手臂的患者(n = 106)对所有问题都给出了良好的回答。PPE和虚拟臂的平均总CARE评分分别为45.02和44.43(差异为0.58 [95% CI: -2.10, 3.30])。关于线性医生同情得分,虚拟组的患者似乎认为医生更温暖(差异,-0.42 [95% CI: -0.87, 0.04]),但比PPE组的患者更不愉快(差异,0.33 [95% CI: -0.40, 1.10])。结论:到急诊科就诊的癌症患者,当医生几乎不带个人防护装备或戴个人防护装备时,他们对移情和同情的感受是一样的。在肿瘤科急诊科访问期间,可以实施针对临床实践特定方面的虚拟服务,以确保患者和医生之间更安全的互动,而不会损害医患关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
期刊最新文献
Neuro-Behcet's Masquerading as Status Epilepticus and Meningoencephalitis in the Emergency Department A Prospective Crossover Study Comparing Six Current Generation Supraglottic Airway Device's Ability to Seal During CPR in Human Cadavers Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Nerve Block for Relief of Acute Cholecystitis Pain Vaginal Pain and Discharge Characteristics of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Acute Aortic Syndromes Resuscitated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1