Empathy Unmasked: Patient Perception of Physician Empathy in an Oncologic Emergency Setting. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Personal Protective Equipment Wear versus Unmasked Video Communication
Kathryn J. Burk MD , John J. Stroh MD , Kelly Larkin MD , Patrick Chaftari MD , Denise M. Langabeer PhD , Jazmin R. Menendez BS , Jeanie F. Woodruff BS , Jan Hargrave EdS , Hongxu Zhu MS , James P. Long PhD , Sai-Ching J. Yeung MD, PhD , Kumar Alagappan MD , Aiham Qdaisat MD, MS
{"title":"Empathy Unmasked: Patient Perception of Physician Empathy in an Oncologic Emergency Setting. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Personal Protective Equipment Wear versus Unmasked Video Communication","authors":"Kathryn J. Burk MD , John J. Stroh MD , Kelly Larkin MD , Patrick Chaftari MD , Denise M. Langabeer PhD , Jazmin R. Menendez BS , Jeanie F. Woodruff BS , Jan Hargrave EdS , Hongxu Zhu MS , James P. Long PhD , Sai-Ching J. Yeung MD, PhD , Kumar Alagappan MD , Aiham Qdaisat MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine emerged as an important option that supports and facilitates clinical practice, however, its usefulness in emergency settings that treat patients with cancer is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate patient perception of physician empathy in an emergency oncology setting, comparing video interaction to an in-person with personal protective equipment (PPE) approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, survey-based randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized 1:1 for the concluding conversation done in-person which included either interacting with physicians wearing PPE or video interaction with physicians without PPE (virtual). Patients’ perceptions of the physicians’ relational empathy were assessed and compared for each group by using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure and the Perception of Physician Compassion measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients (n = 106) in both the PPE and virtual arms provided favorable responses to all questions. The mean overall CARE scores for the PPE and virtual arms were 45.02 and 44.43, respectively (difference, 0.58 [95% CI: -2.10, 3.30]). Regarding the linear physician compassion scores, patients in the virtual arm appeared to consider physicians to be warmer (difference, -0.42 [95% CI: -0.87, 0.04]) but less pleasant (difference, 0.33 [95% CI: -0.40, 1.10]) than did patients in the PPE arm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cancer patients presenting to the emergency department perceive empathy and compassion equally when approached by physicians virtually without PPE or in person while wearing PPE. Virtual services for specific aspects of clinical practice during emergency department visits in an oncology setting can be implemented to ensure safer interactions between patients and physicians without compromising the physician-patient relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine emerged as an important option that supports and facilitates clinical practice, however, its usefulness in emergency settings that treat patients with cancer is unclear.
Objective
To evaluate patient perception of physician empathy in an emergency oncology setting, comparing video interaction to an in-person with personal protective equipment (PPE) approach.
Methods
In this single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, survey-based randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized 1:1 for the concluding conversation done in-person which included either interacting with physicians wearing PPE or video interaction with physicians without PPE (virtual). Patients’ perceptions of the physicians’ relational empathy were assessed and compared for each group by using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure and the Perception of Physician Compassion measure.
Results
Patients (n = 106) in both the PPE and virtual arms provided favorable responses to all questions. The mean overall CARE scores for the PPE and virtual arms were 45.02 and 44.43, respectively (difference, 0.58 [95% CI: -2.10, 3.30]). Regarding the linear physician compassion scores, patients in the virtual arm appeared to consider physicians to be warmer (difference, -0.42 [95% CI: -0.87, 0.04]) but less pleasant (difference, 0.33 [95% CI: -0.40, 1.10]) than did patients in the PPE arm.
Conclusions
Cancer patients presenting to the emergency department perceive empathy and compassion equally when approached by physicians virtually without PPE or in person while wearing PPE. Virtual services for specific aspects of clinical practice during emergency department visits in an oncology setting can be implemented to ensure safer interactions between patients and physicians without compromising the physician-patient relationship.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine