Characteristics of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Acute Aortic Syndromes Resuscitated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR)

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.014
Fumiya Inoue MD , Takayuki Otani MD , Toshikazu Abe MD, MPH, PhD , Akihiko Inoue MD, PhD , Toru Hifumi MD, PhD , Tetsuya Sakamoto MD, PhD , Yasuhiro Kuroda MD, PhD , The SAVE-J II Study Group
{"title":"Characteristics of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Acute Aortic Syndromes Resuscitated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR)","authors":"Fumiya Inoue MD ,&nbsp;Takayuki Otani MD ,&nbsp;Toshikazu Abe MD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Akihiko Inoue MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Toru Hifumi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Sakamoto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Kuroda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;The SAVE-J II Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and acute aortic syndrome (AAS) are etiologies associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), even with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the characteristics of refractory OHCA patients resuscitated with ECPR due to ICH and AAS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a descriptive study and a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, which was a multicenter ECPR registry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 1589 cases, the causes of arrest were ICH in 48 patients (3%), AAS in 112 patients (7%), and cardiac causes in 1429 patients (90%). Patients in the ICH group were younger (ICH: 47 years [interquartile ranges (IQR) 40–63], AAS: 68 years [IQR 59–74], cardiac causes: 61 years [IQR 50–68]; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and had fewer signs of life on hospital arrival (ICH: 2%, AAS: 12%, cardiac causes: 19%; <em>p</em> = 0.001) compared to the cardiac causes group. Patients in the ICH and AAS groups were also less likely to present with an initial shockable rhythm (ICH, 19%; AAS, 27%; cardiac causes, 74%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was significantly lower in the ICH and AAS groups than in the cardiac cause group (ICH, 4%; AAS, 4%; cardiac causes, 29%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Of the 112 patients in the AAS group, 54 (48%) were presumptively diagnosed as cardiac etiologies before ECPR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ICH and AAS should be considered potential causes of cardiac arrest, especially in cases with a nonshockable initial cardiac rhythm. However, differentiating them from cardiac causes of arrest remains challenging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and acute aortic syndrome (AAS) are etiologies associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), even with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the characteristics of refractory OHCA patients resuscitated with ECPR due to ICH and AAS.

Methods

This was a descriptive study and a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, which was a multicenter ECPR registry.

Results

Among the 1589 cases, the causes of arrest were ICH in 48 patients (3%), AAS in 112 patients (7%), and cardiac causes in 1429 patients (90%). Patients in the ICH group were younger (ICH: 47 years [interquartile ranges (IQR) 40–63], AAS: 68 years [IQR 59–74], cardiac causes: 61 years [IQR 50–68]; p < 0.001), and had fewer signs of life on hospital arrival (ICH: 2%, AAS: 12%, cardiac causes: 19%; p = 0.001) compared to the cardiac causes group. Patients in the ICH and AAS groups were also less likely to present with an initial shockable rhythm (ICH, 19%; AAS, 27%; cardiac causes, 74%; p < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was significantly lower in the ICH and AAS groups than in the cardiac cause group (ICH, 4%; AAS, 4%; cardiac causes, 29%; p < 0.001). Of the 112 patients in the AAS group, 54 (48%) were presumptively diagnosed as cardiac etiologies before ECPR.

Conclusion

ICH and AAS should be considered potential causes of cardiac arrest, especially in cases with a nonshockable initial cardiac rhythm. However, differentiating them from cardiac causes of arrest remains challenging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外心肺复苏(ECPR)复苏颅内出血和急性主动脉综合征的特点。
背景:颅内出血(ICH)和急性主动脉综合征(AAS)是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的不良预后相关的病因,即使是体外心肺复苏(ECPR)。目的:本研究旨在描述因脑出血和AAS而行ECPR复苏的难治性OHCA患者的特点。方法:这是一项描述性研究和SAVE-J II研究的二次分析,SAVE-J II研究是一项多中心ECPR登记。结果:1589例患者中,脑出血48例(3%),AAS 112例(7%),心脏原因1429例(90%)。脑出血组患者年龄较小(脑出血:47岁[四分位间距(IQR) 40-63], AAS: 68岁[IQR 59-74],心脏原因:61岁[IQR 50-68];p < 0.001),并且到达医院时生命体征较少(ICH: 2%, AAS: 12%,心脏原因:19%;P = 0.001)。脑出血组和AAS组患者出现初始休克节律的可能性也较小(脑出血,19%;原子吸收光谱法,27%;心脏原因,74%;P < 0.001)。脑出血组和AAS组到出院的生存率明显低于心脏原因组(脑出血组,4%;原子吸收光谱法,4%;心脏原因,29%;P < 0.001)。在AAS组的112例患者中,54例(48%)在ECPR前被推定为心脏病因。结论:脑出血和AAS应被认为是心脏骤停的潜在原因,特别是在初始心律非震荡的情况下。然而,将它们与心脏骤停原因区分开来仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
期刊最新文献
Pearls and Pitfalls for the Emergency Clinician: Beta Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity A Pilot Study Evaluating Erector Spinae Block Versus Saline For Emergency Department Patients With Ureterolithiasis Ultrasound Evaluation of Lens Dislocation with Iridodonesis Fatal Polydrug Intoxication Involving Synthetic Cathinones in Taiwan: A Case Series and Emergency Management Implications Targeting Where the Burden is: Evaluating California’s Emergency Department Screening Program Against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Epidemic Priorities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1