Rahul Ghosh, Jacob Bahnmiller, Andrew Warren, Elina Quiroga, Niten Singh, Benjamin W Starnes, Sara L Zettervall, Kirsten D Dansey
{"title":"Proximity and Prior Medical Engagement Influence Follow-Up After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.","authors":"Rahul Ghosh, Jacob Bahnmiller, Andrew Warren, Elina Quiroga, Niten Singh, Benjamin W Starnes, Sara L Zettervall, Kirsten D Dansey","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Post-repair surveillance of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is critical for detecting potential complications. Substantial loss to follow-up has been reported in populations undergoing elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR); however, there is limited data on follow-up rate among patients presenting with rupture. Thus, we investigated follow-up trends and factors influencing retention at a major academic referral center with a wide service area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with rAAA from 2002-2023 in this retrospective study. Loss to follow-up was defined as absence of vascular surgeon evaluation for 2 years (EVAR) or 5 years (open repair) prior to death or present day. Multivariate regression and survival models assessed the influence of potential factors on follow-up and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 455 patients who presented with rAAA, 60% who underwent EVAR and 39% who underwent open repair were lost to follow-up. 20% of patients who underwent EVAR were lost after initial admission and 40% of patients were lost after the 1-month post-operative follow-up visit. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. Patients lost to follow-up less commonly had Stage 4 CKD (7.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.02) and prior EVAR (10.0% vs 29.2%, p=0.01) at time of rupture. Secondary interventions were less common in patients lost to follow-up (14.5% vs 39.0%, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis of patients who underwent an EVAR, residing more than 10 miles from hospital was associated with loss to follow-up (OR:4.93 [1.14-21.29]). Prior endograft at time of rupture (OR:0.24 [0.06-0.89]), and eGFR < 30 (OR:0.23 [0.06-0.93]) were associated with complete follow-up in patients who underwent EVAR. Patients who were lost to follow up trended towards worse survival (HR 2.04 [0.67-6.26]), while prior endograft was associated with significantly worse survival after EVAR (HR 3.11 [1.20 - 8.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although most patients with rAAA attend their 1-month post-operative visit, the majority are subsequently lost to follow-up. Geographic proximity to the hospital and higher baseline medical engagement, as indicated by prior endograft and chronic kidney disease, appeared to be protective against such loss. Targeted counseling and engagement at the 1-month post-operative visit, particularly in patients with less comorbid conditions, may enhance retention to long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Post-repair surveillance of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is critical for detecting potential complications. Substantial loss to follow-up has been reported in populations undergoing elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR); however, there is limited data on follow-up rate among patients presenting with rupture. Thus, we investigated follow-up trends and factors influencing retention at a major academic referral center with a wide service area.
Methods: We included patients with rAAA from 2002-2023 in this retrospective study. Loss to follow-up was defined as absence of vascular surgeon evaluation for 2 years (EVAR) or 5 years (open repair) prior to death or present day. Multivariate regression and survival models assessed the influence of potential factors on follow-up and survival outcomes.
Results: Of 455 patients who presented with rAAA, 60% who underwent EVAR and 39% who underwent open repair were lost to follow-up. 20% of patients who underwent EVAR were lost after initial admission and 40% of patients were lost after the 1-month post-operative follow-up visit. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. Patients lost to follow-up less commonly had Stage 4 CKD (7.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.02) and prior EVAR (10.0% vs 29.2%, p=0.01) at time of rupture. Secondary interventions were less common in patients lost to follow-up (14.5% vs 39.0%, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis of patients who underwent an EVAR, residing more than 10 miles from hospital was associated with loss to follow-up (OR:4.93 [1.14-21.29]). Prior endograft at time of rupture (OR:0.24 [0.06-0.89]), and eGFR < 30 (OR:0.23 [0.06-0.93]) were associated with complete follow-up in patients who underwent EVAR. Patients who were lost to follow up trended towards worse survival (HR 2.04 [0.67-6.26]), while prior endograft was associated with significantly worse survival after EVAR (HR 3.11 [1.20 - 8.04]).
Conclusions: Although most patients with rAAA attend their 1-month post-operative visit, the majority are subsequently lost to follow-up. Geographic proximity to the hospital and higher baseline medical engagement, as indicated by prior endograft and chronic kidney disease, appeared to be protective against such loss. Targeted counseling and engagement at the 1-month post-operative visit, particularly in patients with less comorbid conditions, may enhance retention to long-term follow-up.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.