Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Perioperative Period for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2024.00037
Zhihai Wang, Miaomiao Lin, Geng Geng, Weiwei Wu, Yong Tao
{"title":"Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Perioperative Period for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer.","authors":"Zhihai Wang, Miaomiao Lin, Geng Geng, Weiwei Wu, Yong Tao","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore a model suitable for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for elderly patients with lung cancer in this region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 elderly patients with lung cancer who were admitted to our department and received thoracoscopic surgery from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were enrolled as observation subjects and were randomly assigned to an ERAS group (100 cases) and a control group (100 cases). All patients were aware of and agreed to enter the study, and the protocols were approved by the hospital ethics committee (2021 Medical Ethics Review 26). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, duration of postoperative chest tube, postoperative pain, and pulmonary function (including forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)) on postoperative day 7 were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly lower in the ERAS group (8.00%) than in the control group (18.00%). The incidence of postoperative atelectasis in the ERAS group (2%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (10%). The duration of postoperative chest tube in the ERAS group (2.57 ± 0.72 days) was significantly shorter than that in the control group (3.92 ± 1.54 days). The postoperative pain score of the ERAS group (2.14 ± 0.86) was significantly lower than that of the control group (3.78 ± 1.15). On postoperative day 7, both FVC and FEV1 in the ERAS group were significantly better than those in the control group. SPSS 20 was used for statistical analysis, and the <i>P</i> < .05 was considered clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ERAS model established in our department can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, relieve postoperative pain, and better protect the lung function of elderly patients with lung cancer. The model is worth promoting because it enhances recovery after surgery and reduces the family burden of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore a model suitable for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for elderly patients with lung cancer in this region.

Methods: A total of 200 elderly patients with lung cancer who were admitted to our department and received thoracoscopic surgery from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were enrolled as observation subjects and were randomly assigned to an ERAS group (100 cases) and a control group (100 cases). All patients were aware of and agreed to enter the study, and the protocols were approved by the hospital ethics committee (2021 Medical Ethics Review 26). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, duration of postoperative chest tube, postoperative pain, and pulmonary function (including forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)) on postoperative day 7 were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly lower in the ERAS group (8.00%) than in the control group (18.00%). The incidence of postoperative atelectasis in the ERAS group (2%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (10%). The duration of postoperative chest tube in the ERAS group (2.57 ± 0.72 days) was significantly shorter than that in the control group (3.92 ± 1.54 days). The postoperative pain score of the ERAS group (2.14 ± 0.86) was significantly lower than that of the control group (3.78 ± 1.15). On postoperative day 7, both FVC and FEV1 in the ERAS group were significantly better than those in the control group. SPSS 20 was used for statistical analysis, and the P < .05 was considered clinically significant.

Conclusion: The ERAS model established in our department can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, relieve postoperative pain, and better protect the lung function of elderly patients with lung cancer. The model is worth promoting because it enhances recovery after surgery and reduces the family burden of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年肺癌患者围手术期术后增强恢复的应用。
目的:探讨一种适合本地区老年肺癌术后增强康复(ERAS)的模型。方法:选取2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日在我科收治并行胸腔镜手术的老年肺癌患者200例作为观察对象,随机分为ERAS组(100例)和对照组(100例)。所有患者均知情并同意参加研究,方案经医院伦理委员会批准(2021年医学伦理审查26)。比较两组术后肺部并发症发生率、术后胸管持续时间、术后疼痛、术后第7天肺功能(包括用力肺活量(FVC)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1))。结果:ERAS组术后肺部并发症发生率(8.00%)明显低于对照组(18.00%)。ERAS组术后肺不张发生率(2%)明显低于对照组(10%)。ERAS组术后胸管使用时间(2.57±0.72 d)明显短于对照组(3.92±1.54 d)。ERAS组术后疼痛评分(2.14±0.86)明显低于对照组(3.78±1.15)。术后第7天,ERAS组FVC和FEV1均明显优于对照组。采用SPSS 20进行统计学分析,以P < 0.05为差异有临床意义。结论:我科建立的ERAS模型可降低老年肺癌患者术后并发症的发生率,减轻术后疼痛,更好地保护老年肺癌患者的肺功能。这种模式值得推广,因为它提高了术后恢复,减轻了患者的家庭负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Describing Sacrocolpopexy in Medical Literature: A Proposed Surgical Classification System. Impact of Body Mass Index on Operative Time in Women Undergoing Benign Hysterectomy. Utility of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery for Retroperitoneal Tumors. Initial Outcomes and Methodologies of a Novel Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. Novel Concept of Electrocoagulation and Tumor Cell Implantation: Creation of Minimally Invasive Orthotopic Murine Model of Pancreatic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1