In Vivo Measurements of Appendiceal Base - Implications on Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2024.00033
Sanimir Suljendic, Edin Husaric, Amir Halilbasic, Samir Delibegovic
{"title":"In Vivo Measurements of Appendiceal Base - Implications on Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy.","authors":"Sanimir Suljendic, Edin Husaric, Amir Halilbasic, Samir Delibegovic","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Securing the base of the appendix is the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Determining the average values of the appendix, will facilitate the creation of suitable instruments, and will also have an impact on research in imaging studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and eight patients with the acute appendicitis were randomized into 2 groups: group I: children aged 2-10 years old, group II: children >10 years of age. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups: phlegmonous, gangrenous and perforated forms of acute appendicitis. The external diameter of the appendiceal base, the middle part of the appendix, the tip and the length were determined. The measurements were made with the help of Vernier calipers, and expressed in millimeters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 5.68 ± 1.51 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.08 ± 1.82 mm, and in the perforated form 6.94 ± 2.43 mm. In group II, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 7.29 ± 2.75 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.24 ± 2.11 mm, and in the perforated form 9.31 ± 3.07 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most appendices can be removed by standard methods, the maximum sizes observed in this study reveal that standard endoloop or plastic and titanium clips cannot be used in the procedure and instead the more expensive stapler has to be utilized.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Securing the base of the appendix is the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Determining the average values of the appendix, will facilitate the creation of suitable instruments, and will also have an impact on research in imaging studies.

Methods: One hundred and eight patients with the acute appendicitis were randomized into 2 groups: group I: children aged 2-10 years old, group II: children >10 years of age. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups: phlegmonous, gangrenous and perforated forms of acute appendicitis. The external diameter of the appendiceal base, the middle part of the appendix, the tip and the length were determined. The measurements were made with the help of Vernier calipers, and expressed in millimeters.

Results: In group I, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 5.68 ± 1.51 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.08 ± 1.82 mm, and in the perforated form 6.94 ± 2.43 mm. In group II, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 7.29 ± 2.75 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.24 ± 2.11 mm, and in the perforated form 9.31 ± 3.07 mm.

Conclusion: Although most appendices can be removed by standard methods, the maximum sizes observed in this study reveal that standard endoloop or plastic and titanium clips cannot be used in the procedure and instead the more expensive stapler has to be utilized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾基底的体内测量-对儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术的意义。
背景和目的:固定阑尾底部是儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术中最关键的部分。确定阑尾的平均值将有助于创造合适的器械,也将对影像学研究产生影响:方法:将 108 名急性阑尾炎患者随机分为两组:第一组:2-10 岁儿童;第二组:10 岁以上儿童。每组又分为 3 个亚组:痰型、坏疽型和穿孔型急性阑尾炎。测定阑尾基底、阑尾中间部分、顶端和长度的外径。测量使用游标卡尺,单位为毫米:在第一组中,痰状阑尾基底的平均尺寸为 5.68 ± 1.51 毫米,坏疽阑尾基底的平均尺寸为 7.08 ± 1.82 毫米,穿孔阑尾基底的平均尺寸为 6.94 ± 2.43 毫米。在第二组中,痰状阑尾基底的平均尺寸为(7.29 ± 2.75)毫米,坏疽阑尾基底的平均尺寸为(7.24 ± 2.11)毫米,穿孔阑尾基底的平均尺寸为(9.31 ± 3.07)毫米:虽然大多数阑尾都能通过标准方法切除,但本研究中观察到的最大阑尾尺寸表明,手术中不能使用标准内环或塑料和钛夹,而必须使用更昂贵的订书机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness. Minimizing Risk of Retroperitoneal Major Vascular Injury with Abdominal Wall Elevation Device during Abdominal Entry for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery. Modified Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Trans-Hiatal Esophageal Transection. Learning Curve in Robotic Colorectal Surgery. Outcomes of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Dual-Mesh Laparoscopic TEP Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1