Comparative pharmacokinetics study of two tablet formulations of delpazolid, a novel oxazolidinone class antibiotic.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e18
JaeEun Koh, Juyoung Khwarg, Young Lag Cho, Kyung-Sang Yu, Jae-Yong Chung
{"title":"Comparative pharmacokinetics study of two tablet formulations of delpazolid, a novel oxazolidinone class antibiotic.","authors":"JaeEun Koh, Juyoung Khwarg, Young Lag Cho, Kyung-Sang Yu, Jae-Yong Chung","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delpazolid is an oxazolidinone-class antibiotic under development for treating diseases caused by antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive bacteria. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of two formulations of delpazolid 400 mg with distinct excipient compositions: Batch No. 3183817R (test drug) and Batch No. 1650006 (reference drug). A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study was conducted. The participants received a single oral dose of delpazolid 400 mg (test or reference) in each period, with serial blood samples collected up to 12 hours post-dose. The PK parameters of delpazolid were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test drug to the reference drug were estimated for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last observation (AUC<sub>last</sub>). Safety assessments were also conducted. Twenty-four participants completed the study as planned. The PK profiles of delpazolid were similar between the test and reference drugs. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the test to the reference for C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last</sub> were 1.1265 (0.8666-1.4644) and 1.0290 (0.9402-1.1261), respectively. The result of AUC<sub>last</sub> met the bioequivalence criteria (0.8-1.25), but the 90% CI for C<sub>max</sub> exceeded the upper limit of 1.25. Both drugs were safe and well tolerated. The two different delpazolid formulations showed comparable PK and safety profiles, indicating that the test drug is an appropriate alternative to the reference drug.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04939779.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"32 4","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delpazolid is an oxazolidinone-class antibiotic under development for treating diseases caused by antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive bacteria. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of two formulations of delpazolid 400 mg with distinct excipient compositions: Batch No. 3183817R (test drug) and Batch No. 1650006 (reference drug). A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study was conducted. The participants received a single oral dose of delpazolid 400 mg (test or reference) in each period, with serial blood samples collected up to 12 hours post-dose. The PK parameters of delpazolid were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test drug to the reference drug were estimated for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last observation (AUClast). Safety assessments were also conducted. Twenty-four participants completed the study as planned. The PK profiles of delpazolid were similar between the test and reference drugs. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the test to the reference for Cmax and AUClast were 1.1265 (0.8666-1.4644) and 1.0290 (0.9402-1.1261), respectively. The result of AUClast met the bioequivalence criteria (0.8-1.25), but the 90% CI for Cmax exceeded the upper limit of 1.25. Both drugs were safe and well tolerated. The two different delpazolid formulations showed comparable PK and safety profiles, indicating that the test drug is an appropriate alternative to the reference drug.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04939779.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型恶唑烷酮类抗生素德尔帕唑啉两种片剂的药代动力学比较研究。
Delpazolid是一种正在开发的恶唑烷类抗生素,用于治疗耐药革兰氏阳性菌引起的疾病。本研究比较了批号为3183817R(试验药)和批号为1650006(参比药)的delpazolid 400mg两种不同辅料组成制剂的药代动力学(PK)和安全性。进行了随机、开放标签、单剂量、双向交叉研究。参与者在每个时期接受单次口服剂量400 mg的delpazolid(试验或参考),并在给药后12小时收集连续的血液样本。采用非区室法计算德尔帕唑啉的PK参数。从时间0到最后一次观察(AUClast),估计受试药物与参比药物的最大血药浓度(Cmax)和血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(Cmax)的几何平均比(GMRs)及其90%置信区间(CIs)。还进行了安全评估。24名参与者按计划完成了研究。德尔帕唑啉的PK谱与对照药相似。Cmax和AUClast相对于参考的gmr (90% ci)分别为1.1265(0.8666 ~ 1.4644)和1.0290(0.9402 ~ 1.1261)。AUClast的结果满足生物等效性标准(0.8 ~ 1.25),但Cmax的90% CI超过了1.25的上限。两种药物都是安全且耐受性良好的。两种不同的德尔帕唑啉制剂显示出相当的PK和安全性,表明试验药物是标准药物的合适替代品。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04939779。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing collaborations in clinical trials in Korea using association rule mining. Cardiotoxicity evaluation of two-drug fixed-dose combination therapy under CiPA: a computational study. Comparative pharmacokinetics study of two tablet formulations of delpazolid, a novel oxazolidinone class antibiotic. PMDA initiatives to enhance drug development via multi-regional clinical trials. Research on unintroduced new drugs in South Korea from 2011 to 2020: approaches to prioritization and strategy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1