Update report on the quality of gliomas radiomics: An integration of bibliometric and radiomics quality score.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING World journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.794
Xu Cao, Ming Xiong, Zhi Liu, Jing Yang, Yu-Bo Kan, Li-Qiang Zhang, Yan-Hui Liu, Ming-Guo Xie, Xiao-Fei Hu
{"title":"Update report on the quality of gliomas radiomics: An integration of bibliometric and radiomics quality score.","authors":"Xu Cao, Ming Xiong, Zhi Liu, Jing Yang, Yu-Bo Kan, Li-Qiang Zhang, Yan-Hui Liu, Ming-Guo Xie, Xiao-Fei Hu","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the increasing number of publications on glioma radiomics, challenges persist in clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the development and reporting quality of radiomics in brain gliomas since 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis was conducted to reveal trends in brain glioma radiomics research. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), a metric for evaluating the quality of radiomics studies, was applied to assess the quality of adult-type diffuse glioma studies published since 2019. The total RQS score and the basic adherence rate for each item were calculated. Subgroup analysis by journal type and research objective was performed, correlating the total RQS score with journal impact factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiomics research in glioma was initiated in 2011 and has witnessed a surge since 2019. Among the 260 original studies, the median RQS score was 11, correlating with a basic compliance rate of 46.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in domain 1 and its subitems (multiple segmentations) across journal types (<i>P</i> = 0.039 and <i>P</i> = 0.03, respectively). The Spearman correlation coefficients indicated that the total RQS score had a negative correlation with the Journal Citation Report category (-0.69) and a positive correlation with the five-year impact factors (0.318) of journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Glioma radiomics research quality has improved since 2019 but necessitates further advancement with higher publication standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"16 12","pages":"794-805"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing number of publications on glioma radiomics, challenges persist in clinical translation.

Aim: To assess the development and reporting quality of radiomics in brain gliomas since 2019.

Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted to reveal trends in brain glioma radiomics research. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), a metric for evaluating the quality of radiomics studies, was applied to assess the quality of adult-type diffuse glioma studies published since 2019. The total RQS score and the basic adherence rate for each item were calculated. Subgroup analysis by journal type and research objective was performed, correlating the total RQS score with journal impact factors.

Results: The radiomics research in glioma was initiated in 2011 and has witnessed a surge since 2019. Among the 260 original studies, the median RQS score was 11, correlating with a basic compliance rate of 46.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in domain 1 and its subitems (multiple segmentations) across journal types (P = 0.039 and P = 0.03, respectively). The Spearman correlation coefficients indicated that the total RQS score had a negative correlation with the Journal Citation Report category (-0.69) and a positive correlation with the five-year impact factors (0.318) of journals.

Conclusion: Glioma radiomics research quality has improved since 2019 but necessitates further advancement with higher publication standards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶质瘤放射组学质量的最新报告:文献计量学和放射组学质量评分的整合。
背景:尽管关于神经胶质瘤放射组学的出版物越来越多,但在临床翻译方面仍然存在挑战。目的:评价2019年以来脑胶质瘤放射组学的发展和报道质量。方法:通过文献计量学分析揭示脑胶质瘤放射组学研究的趋势。放射组学质量评分(RQS)是评估放射组学研究质量的指标,用于评估自2019年以来发表的成人型弥漫性胶质瘤研究的质量。计算各项目的RQS总分和基本依从率。按期刊类型和研究目的进行亚组分析,将RQS总分与期刊影响因子进行相关性分析。结果:胶质瘤放射组学研究始于2011年,自2019年以来迅猛发展。在260项原始研究中,RQS得分中位数为11分,基本依从率为46.8%。亚组分析显示,不同期刊类型在域1及其子项(多个分段)上存在显著差异(P = 0.039和P = 0.03)。Spearman相关系数显示,RQS总分与期刊引文报告类别呈负相关(-0.69),与期刊5年影响因子呈正相关(0.318)。结论:自2019年以来,胶质瘤放射组学的研究质量有所提高,但需要进一步提高出版标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Proposed computed tomography severity index for the evaluation of invasive fungal sinusitis: Preliminary results. Relationship between imaging changes of the pancreas and islet beta-cell function. Role of multi-parametric ultrasonography for the assessment and monitoring of functional status of renal allografts with histopathological correlation. Surgeon oriented reporting template for magnetic resonance imaging and endoanal ultrasound of anal fistulas enhances surgical decision-making. Update report on the quality of gliomas radiomics: An integration of bibliometric and radiomics quality score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1