T. Hysing-Dahl, A. G. Faleide, L. H. Magnussen, E. Inderhaug
{"title":"The Norwegian version of the Norwich Patellar Instability score has good validity and moderate reproducibility","authors":"T. Hysing-Dahl, A. G. Faleide, L. H. Magnussen, E. Inderhaug","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To translate and adapt the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score into Norwegian, and second, to examine the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version (NPI-No).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>NPI was translated according to international guidelines. A cohort of 107 patients surgically treated for recurrent patellofemoral instability completed NPI-No, related questionnaires and functional tests prior to and six months post-surgery. Validity (face, content and construct validity), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha [<i>α</i>]), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]], measurement error (standard error of measurement [SEM] and smallest detectable change at individual [SDC<sub>ind</sub>] and group level [SDC<sub>group</sub>]) and construct validity (hypotheses testing; independent <i>t</i> tests, Pearson's <i>r</i>) were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>NPI-No had good face and content validity. Internal consistency was satisfactory (<i>α</i> = 0.88), test–retest reliability was moderate ICC<sub>2.1</sub> 0.65 (95% confidence interval = 0.47–0.77) and measurement error low (SEM = 7.8). SDC<sub>ind</sub> was 21.7 points and SDC<sub>group</sub> was 2.8. Seven of the 10 hypotheses about construct validity were confirmed. While there was no ceiling effect pre- or post-operatively, a substantial floor effect (28%) was observed at the 6-month follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The NPI-No is valid for assessment of self-perceived patellar instability before and after surgery in Norwegian patients. However, reproducibility was found to be only moderate. This study adds further knowledge about the measurement properties of the NPI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level II.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To translate and adapt the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score into Norwegian, and second, to examine the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version (NPI-No).
Methods
NPI was translated according to international guidelines. A cohort of 107 patients surgically treated for recurrent patellofemoral instability completed NPI-No, related questionnaires and functional tests prior to and six months post-surgery. Validity (face, content and construct validity), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha [α]), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]], measurement error (standard error of measurement [SEM] and smallest detectable change at individual [SDCind] and group level [SDCgroup]) and construct validity (hypotheses testing; independent t tests, Pearson's r) were examined.
Results
NPI-No had good face and content validity. Internal consistency was satisfactory (α = 0.88), test–retest reliability was moderate ICC2.1 0.65 (95% confidence interval = 0.47–0.77) and measurement error low (SEM = 7.8). SDCind was 21.7 points and SDCgroup was 2.8. Seven of the 10 hypotheses about construct validity were confirmed. While there was no ceiling effect pre- or post-operatively, a substantial floor effect (28%) was observed at the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion
The NPI-No is valid for assessment of self-perceived patellar instability before and after surgery in Norwegian patients. However, reproducibility was found to be only moderate. This study adds further knowledge about the measurement properties of the NPI.