Respiratory muscle training in people with cervical spinal cord injury - A systematic review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2433839
Felipe de Oliveira Rodrigues, Marina Martins Pereira Padovani, Bárbara Pereira Lopes, Júlia Araújo de Moura, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama
{"title":"Respiratory muscle training in people with cervical spinal cord injury - A systematic review.","authors":"Felipe de Oliveira Rodrigues, Marina Martins Pereira Padovani, Bárbara Pereira Lopes, Júlia Araújo de Moura, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2433839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord injury is a physiological disruption often caused by trauma, leading to severe physical and psychological effects, including irreversible impairment and disability. Cervical injuries, particularly between C1 and C8, are the most severe, potentially causing diaphragm paralysis and requiring mechanical ventilation. Reduced respiratory muscle strength not only affects respiratory function but also significantly impacts voice, speech, and communication, which are crucial for quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a systematic review of the literature on respiratory muscle training protocols in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury and evaluate the methodological quality of scientific publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were searched by two independent researchers in the Regional Portal of the Virtual Health Library, EMBASE, SCOPUS and PubMed databases, using the descriptors: \"respiratory muscle strength\", \"breathing training\", and \"cervical spinal cord injury\", with no restriction on the time of publication. Studies containing respiratory muscle strength measurements and respiratory muscle training in people with cervical SCI were included and those that associated other techniques with functional respiratory training, such as electrical stimulation and other complementary techniques were excluded. The studies had the methodological quality (internal and external validity) classified by the PEDro scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were identified and considered valid based on the inclusion criteria. The protocols presented varied parameters. The session time ranged from 15 to 45 minutes, the number of sessions per day ranged from 1 to 2, the number of days per week ranged from 3 to 7, and the number of intervention weeks ranged from 4 to 10. Only three studies presented internal and external validity for respiratory muscle training programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified that respiratory muscle training is an effective intervention to improve respiratory function in people with cervical SCI. However, due to the poor methodological quality of the studies, the effect size of the treatment, as well as the ideal dose and intensity, requires further investigation to better determine its overall effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2433839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord injury is a physiological disruption often caused by trauma, leading to severe physical and psychological effects, including irreversible impairment and disability. Cervical injuries, particularly between C1 and C8, are the most severe, potentially causing diaphragm paralysis and requiring mechanical ventilation. Reduced respiratory muscle strength not only affects respiratory function but also significantly impacts voice, speech, and communication, which are crucial for quality of life.

Objective: Conduct a systematic review of the literature on respiratory muscle training protocols in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury and evaluate the methodological quality of scientific publications.

Methods: Studies were searched by two independent researchers in the Regional Portal of the Virtual Health Library, EMBASE, SCOPUS and PubMed databases, using the descriptors: "respiratory muscle strength", "breathing training", and "cervical spinal cord injury", with no restriction on the time of publication. Studies containing respiratory muscle strength measurements and respiratory muscle training in people with cervical SCI were included and those that associated other techniques with functional respiratory training, such as electrical stimulation and other complementary techniques were excluded. The studies had the methodological quality (internal and external validity) classified by the PEDro scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database).

Results: Nine studies were identified and considered valid based on the inclusion criteria. The protocols presented varied parameters. The session time ranged from 15 to 45 minutes, the number of sessions per day ranged from 1 to 2, the number of days per week ranged from 3 to 7, and the number of intervention weeks ranged from 4 to 10. Only three studies presented internal and external validity for respiratory muscle training programs.

Conclusion: This review identified that respiratory muscle training is an effective intervention to improve respiratory function in people with cervical SCI. However, due to the poor methodological quality of the studies, the effect size of the treatment, as well as the ideal dose and intensity, requires further investigation to better determine its overall effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸肌肉训练在颈脊髓损伤患者中的应用——系统综述。
脊髓损伤是一种通常由创伤引起的生理破坏,导致严重的生理和心理影响,包括不可逆的损伤和残疾。颈椎损伤,特别是C1和C8之间的损伤最为严重,可能导致膈肌麻痹,需要机械通气。呼吸肌力量减弱不仅会影响呼吸功能,还会严重影响对生活质量至关重要的声音、语言和交流。目的:对颈脊髓损伤个体呼吸肌训练方案的文献进行系统回顾,并评估科学出版物的方法学质量。方法:由两名独立研究人员在虚拟健康图书馆区域门户网站、EMBASE、SCOPUS和PubMed数据库中检索研究,使用描述词:“呼吸肌力量”、“呼吸训练”和“颈脊髓损伤”,不限制发表时间。包含呼吸肌肉力量测量和呼吸肌肉训练的研究纳入了颈椎脊髓损伤患者的研究,排除了其他与呼吸功能训练相关的技术,如电刺激和其他辅助技术。这些研究采用PEDro量表(物理治疗证据数据库)进行方法学质量(内部和外部效度)分类。结果:根据纳入标准确定了9项研究并认为有效。方案提出了不同的参数。治疗时间从15到45分钟不等,每天治疗次数从1到2次不等,每周治疗天数从3到7天不等,干预时间从4到10周不等。只有三个研究提出了内部和外部有效性的呼吸肌训练计划。结论:本综述确认呼吸肌训练是改善颈椎脊髓损伤患者呼吸功能的有效干预措施。然而,由于研究的方法学质量较差,治疗的效应大小以及理想剂量和强度需要进一步调查,以更好地确定其总体有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological profile of people with spinal cord injury in Ecuador: A population-based design and cohort profile. Examining motivators and barriers to meditation practice among individuals with spinal cord injury: Insights from a survey study. Indications, feasibility safety and efficacy of dorsal rhizotomy at the level of the conus medullaris (conus deafferentation) in individuals with spinal cord injury. Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing. Readability assessment of patient education materials on autonomic dysreflexia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1