Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687
James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson
{"title":"Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing.","authors":"James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Diagnostic Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10<sup>-6</sup>) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Diagnostic Study.

Objectives: Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.

Setting: Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).

Methods: Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.

Results: The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10-6) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.

Conclusions: With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological profile of people with spinal cord injury in Ecuador: A population-based design and cohort profile. Examining motivators and barriers to meditation practice among individuals with spinal cord injury: Insights from a survey study. Indications, feasibility safety and efficacy of dorsal rhizotomy at the level of the conus medullaris (conus deafferentation) in individuals with spinal cord injury. Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing. Readability assessment of patient education materials on autonomic dysreflexia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1