James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson
{"title":"Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing.","authors":"James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Diagnostic Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10<sup>-6</sup>) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Diagnostic Study.
Objectives: Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.
Setting: Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).
Methods: Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.
Results: The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10-6) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.
Conclusions: With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.