Cross-Calibration of Areal Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between DMS Stratos and Hologic Horizon A Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers: The Effect of Body Mass Index

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101553
Laurent Maïmoun , Sandrine Alonso , Krishna Kunal Mahadea , Julien Dubois , Tom Paunet , Florentin Kucharczak , Lisa Maïmoun Nande , Vincent Boudousq , Thibault Mura , Denis Mariano-Goulart
{"title":"Cross-Calibration of Areal Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between DMS Stratos and Hologic Horizon A Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers: The Effect of Body Mass Index","authors":"Laurent Maïmoun ,&nbsp;Sandrine Alonso ,&nbsp;Krishna Kunal Mahadea ,&nbsp;Julien Dubois ,&nbsp;Tom Paunet ,&nbsp;Florentin Kucharczak ,&nbsp;Lisa Maïmoun Nande ,&nbsp;Vincent Boudousq ,&nbsp;Thibault Mura ,&nbsp;Denis Mariano-Goulart","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Purpose:</em> The aim of this study was to investigate the correlations between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and body composition measured by two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA), the DMS Stratos® (STR) and the Hologic Horizon A® (HRZ), and then generate cross-calibration equations between the two scanners.</div><div><em>Methods:</em> Repeat scans were obtained from 251 adults (85 % female), 36 ± 14 years old with mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 ± 11.1 kg/m2, using HRZ (fan-beam technology) and STR (pencil-beam technology). aBMD was measured at whole body [WB], femoral neck [FN], total hip [TH], lumbar spine [LS] and radius, while fat mass [FM] and lean tissue mass [LTM] were determined at whole body and at android and gynoid subregions.</div><div><em>Results:</em> Compared to HRZ, STR underestimated both aBMD at WB and radius and LTM at WB and android and gynoid regions. Conversely, STR overestimated aBMD at FN, TH, LS and FM at WB android and gynoid regions. Except for WB bone mineral content (r = 0.87) and WB aBMD (r = 0.84), there were strong correlations of aBMD and body composition between the two DXAs (r &gt; 0.91; p &lt; 0.0001). Several of the parameters that required the determination of specific cross-calibration equations because of the significant bias between the two DXAs were found to be influenced by BMI.</div><div><em>Conclusions:</em> Although the data from the STR and the HRZ were highly correlated for aBMD and body composition parameters, a systematic measurement bias between two DXAs was observed. The development of cross-calibration equations fully corrected these differences and they may thus be useful for multicenter studies when scans are performed with STR and HRZ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"28 1","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695024000866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlations between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and body composition measured by two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA), the DMS Stratos® (STR) and the Hologic Horizon A® (HRZ), and then generate cross-calibration equations between the two scanners.
Methods: Repeat scans were obtained from 251 adults (85 % female), 36 ± 14 years old with mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 ± 11.1 kg/m2, using HRZ (fan-beam technology) and STR (pencil-beam technology). aBMD was measured at whole body [WB], femoral neck [FN], total hip [TH], lumbar spine [LS] and radius, while fat mass [FM] and lean tissue mass [LTM] were determined at whole body and at android and gynoid subregions.
Results: Compared to HRZ, STR underestimated both aBMD at WB and radius and LTM at WB and android and gynoid regions. Conversely, STR overestimated aBMD at FN, TH, LS and FM at WB android and gynoid regions. Except for WB bone mineral content (r = 0.87) and WB aBMD (r = 0.84), there were strong correlations of aBMD and body composition between the two DXAs (r > 0.91; p < 0.0001). Several of the parameters that required the determination of specific cross-calibration equations because of the significant bias between the two DXAs were found to be influenced by BMI.
Conclusions: Although the data from the STR and the HRZ were highly correlated for aBMD and body composition parameters, a systematic measurement bias between two DXAs was observed. The development of cross-calibration equations fully corrected these differences and they may thus be useful for multicenter studies when scans are performed with STR and HRZ.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DMS Stratos和Hologic Horizon A双能x射线吸收仪间骨矿物质密度和身体成分的交叉校准:体质指数的影响。
目的:研究DMS Stratos®(STR)和Hologic Horizon A®(HRZ)两种双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)测量的面骨矿物质密度(aBMD)与人体成分的相关性,并建立两种扫描仪之间的交叉校准方程。方法:采用扇形波束技术(HRZ)和铅笔波束技术(STR)对251名成人(85% %女性),36名 ± 14岁,平均体重指数(BMI) 28.7 ± 11.1 kg/m2进行重复扫描。测定全身[WB]、股骨颈[FN]、全髋[TH]、腰椎[LS]和桡骨的aBMD,测定全身、机器人和女性骨亚区脂肪量[FM]和瘦组织量[LTM]。结果:与HRZ相比,STR低估了WB和桡骨区的aBMD,低估了WB、android和gynyl区域的LTM。相反,STR高估了WB机器人和gynoid区域的FN、TH、LS和FM的aBMD。除了WB骨矿物质含量(r = 0.87)和WB aBMD (r = 0.84)外,两种DXAs之间的aBMD与体成分有很强的相关性(r > 0.91;p 结论:虽然STR和HRZ的数据与aBMD和体成分参数高度相关,但两种dxa之间存在系统性的测量偏差。交叉校准方程的发展完全纠正了这些差异,因此,当使用STR和HRZ进行扫描时,它们可能对多中心研究有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
期刊最新文献
Bone quality is associated with fragility fracture in patients with hemoglobinopathies Evaluating lower limits of body fat percentage in athletes using DXA Influence of two strength training modalities (hypertrophy vs. contrast training) on muscular strength, bone health parameters and quality of life in a group of older adults with low skeletal muscle mass index Evaluation of lumbar vertebral bone quality using T1-weighted MRI: Can it differentiate normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis? Development of an Algorithm to Predict Appendicular Lean Mass Index From Regional Spine and Hip Dxa Scans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1