Patient views on continued immune checkpoint inhibition following progression in advanced melanoma: A qualitative study.

Abstract

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized the management of metastatic melanoma, including in the final stages of disease progression: because it is well tolerated, some teams do not discontinue it in hopes of slowing disease progression. The risks are that treatment may be continued unnecessarily, causing side effects, and reduce access to specialist palliative care, in addition to increasing the cost of treatment.

Method: We explored the experiences of 10 patients in a university hospital with metastatic melanoma under continued immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with specialist palliative care. Our goal was to gain a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages perceived by patients. The comprehensive interviews were analysed using a method inspired by grounded theory that met the COREQ international recommendation criteria.

Results: Receiving the information of disease progression, continued treatment and onset of palliative care impacts patients' lives: from this point onwards, death becomes a reality and takes on the image of a sword of Damocles. The experience is anxiety-provoking because of the uncertainty of tomorrow, and painful because of the physical suffering and successive bereavements. However, far from causing depression and despair, joint oncology-palliative management is well accepted and helps to improve patients' daily lives and well-being.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight patients' ambivalence. On the one hand, they recount their experiences of suffering in connection with the disease and the confrontation with death, and on the other hand, their need to continue to live and to hope. Joint care provided by oncology and palliative care teams, symbolically representing hope and death, may mirror patients' psychological mindset and provide just the support they need.