Experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in Latin America between 2016 and 2020.

Camilo Pizarro, Anderson Bermon, Silvia Plata Vanegas, Claudia Colmenares-Mejia, Claudia Marcela Poveda, René D Gómez Gutiérrez, Jorge Arturo Ramírez Arce, Sonia Villarroe, Daniel Absi, Marco Antonio Montes de Oca Sandoval, Fernando Pálizas, Leonardo Salazar
{"title":"Experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in Latin America between 2016 and 2020.","authors":"Camilo Pizarro, Anderson Bermon, Silvia Plata Vanegas, Claudia Colmenares-Mejia, Claudia Marcela Poveda, René D Gómez Gutiérrez, Jorge Arturo Ramírez Arce, Sonia Villarroe, Daniel Absi, Marco Antonio Montes de Oca Sandoval, Fernando Pálizas, Leonardo Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the experience with ECMO therapy in healthcare institutions across Latin America between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private and public health institutions from 7 countries.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>ECMO Intensive Care Units.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>General characteristics of the center (country, ELSO center, year of first cannulation, public or private network, ECMO devices available, mobile ECMO), professional category (nurses, physicians, specialists and other professionals), nurse-to-patient ratio, interventions applied(support indications, scores, mechanical ventilation at ECMO commencement, anticoagulation and hemolysis, circuit monitoring and patient perfusion, antibiotic prophylaxis), and patient outcomes (complications and survival) in ECMO centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen ECMO units were included. These units reported 133 consoles and 1629 ECMO cannulations. Of these, 1018 corresponded to adult patients, 468 to pediatric patients, and 143 to newborn infants. A total of 310 medical specialists were involved in ECMO care, of whom 70.3% had received ECMO training. The nurse-to-patient ratio was 1:1 in most centers (76.9%, n = 10). Amongst adult patients, the most common indication for initiating ECMO support was refractory hypoxemia, whereas in pediatric patients, it was a post-cardiotomy shock. The mean overall survival rate of the patients at the time of decannulation was 55.7% (95%CI 53.0-58.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ICUs with ECMO in Latin America participating in this study have demonstrated operational capabilities enabling them to achieve outcomes comparable to those of other ECMO units across the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To document the experience with ECMO therapy in healthcare institutions across Latin America between 2016 and 2020.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Private and public health institutions from 7 countries.

Participants: ECMO Intensive Care Units.

Interventions: None.

Main variables of interest: General characteristics of the center (country, ELSO center, year of first cannulation, public or private network, ECMO devices available, mobile ECMO), professional category (nurses, physicians, specialists and other professionals), nurse-to-patient ratio, interventions applied(support indications, scores, mechanical ventilation at ECMO commencement, anticoagulation and hemolysis, circuit monitoring and patient perfusion, antibiotic prophylaxis), and patient outcomes (complications and survival) in ECMO centers.

Results: Thirteen ECMO units were included. These units reported 133 consoles and 1629 ECMO cannulations. Of these, 1018 corresponded to adult patients, 468 to pediatric patients, and 143 to newborn infants. A total of 310 medical specialists were involved in ECMO care, of whom 70.3% had received ECMO training. The nurse-to-patient ratio was 1:1 in most centers (76.9%, n = 10). Amongst adult patients, the most common indication for initiating ECMO support was refractory hypoxemia, whereas in pediatric patients, it was a post-cardiotomy shock. The mean overall survival rate of the patients at the time of decannulation was 55.7% (95%CI 53.0-58.3).

Conclusions: The ICUs with ECMO in Latin America participating in this study have demonstrated operational capabilities enabling them to achieve outcomes comparable to those of other ECMO units across the world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016年至2020年在拉丁美洲进行体外膜氧合支持的经验
目的:记录2016年至2020年间拉丁美洲医疗机构ECMO治疗的经验。设计:横断面研究。环境:来自7个国家的私营和公共卫生机构。参与者:ECMO重症监护病房。干预措施:没有。主要感兴趣的变量:中心的一般特征(国家、ELSO中心、首次插管年份、公共或私人网络、可用ECMO设备、移动ECMO)、专业类别(护士、医生、专家和其他专业人员)、护士与患者比例、应用的干预措施(支持指征、评分、ECMO开始时的机械通气、抗凝和溶血、电路监测和患者灌注、抗生素预防)、以及患者在ECMO中心的预后(并发症和生存率)。结果:纳入13个ECMO单元。这些单位报告133个控制台和1629个ECMO插管。其中,成人患者1018例,儿科患者468例,新生儿143例。共有310名医学专家参与体外氧合治疗,其中70.3%接受过体外氧合培训。大多数中心的护患比为1:1 (76.9%,n = 10)。在成人患者中,启动ECMO支持的最常见适应症是难治性低氧血症,而在儿科患者中,它是开心术后休克。拔管时患者平均总生存率为55.7% (95%CI 53.0 ~ 58.3)。结论:参与本研究的拉丁美洲ECMO icu已经展示了操作能力,使其能够实现与世界各地其他ECMO单位相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The human factor and ergonomics in Patient Safety Safe practices in Intensive Care Medicine, is zero risk possible? Horner’s syndrome after chest drain insertion due to pneumothorax Dynamic air bronchogram in pneumococcal community acquired pneumonia Clinical utility of rapid shallow breathing index in predicting successful weaning: secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1