Midwives perspectives of barriers and facilitators for the practice of promoting women's positive childbirth experience in China: A qualitative study.

Yaxuan Xu, Yuhan Tang, Mengxue Wang, Xiaoyue Wang, Wenli Xu, Fengying Zhang, Lihua Zhou
{"title":"Midwives perspectives of barriers and facilitators for the practice of promoting women's positive childbirth experience in China: A qualitative study.","authors":"Yaxuan Xu, Yuhan Tang, Mengxue Wang, Xiaoyue Wang, Wenli Xu, Fengying Zhang, Lihua Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women-centered care for positive childbirth experiences is currently a global trend. However, there are some barriers to promoting women's positive childbirth experiences in practice. This study explored midwives' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to promoting women's positive childbirth experience in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 18 midwives in the birth unit of four tertiary care hospitals in Hefei, Anhui Province, China. Thematic analysis was used to code the interviews with deductive codes, and we organized findings according to levels of influence within the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model, a socioecological model of health.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Midwives reported barriers to women's positive childbirth experience were identified on four levels: individual factors included psychological barriers and childbirth expectations (micro level), social and community and organization factors included interpersonal violence, medical mistrust and obstetric violence and outcome (meso level), healthcare system factors included midwife shortage and hospital environment (macro level). Facilitators for a positive birth experience include antenatal education, community continuum of care, and respectful and understanding care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that midwives experienced several barriers and facilitators in providing positive childbirth experience care to women in the Chinese context. The findings will help maternity care providers and policymakers develop multi-level implementation strategies at the individual, social, community, organization, and healthcare system levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":94269,"journal":{"name":"Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives","volume":"38 1","pages":"101867"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women-centered care for positive childbirth experiences is currently a global trend. However, there are some barriers to promoting women's positive childbirth experiences in practice. This study explored midwives' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to promoting women's positive childbirth experience in practice.

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 18 midwives in the birth unit of four tertiary care hospitals in Hefei, Anhui Province, China. Thematic analysis was used to code the interviews with deductive codes, and we organized findings according to levels of influence within the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model, a socioecological model of health.

Result: Midwives reported barriers to women's positive childbirth experience were identified on four levels: individual factors included psychological barriers and childbirth expectations (micro level), social and community and organization factors included interpersonal violence, medical mistrust and obstetric violence and outcome (meso level), healthcare system factors included midwife shortage and hospital environment (macro level). Facilitators for a positive birth experience include antenatal education, community continuum of care, and respectful and understanding care.

Conclusion: This study indicated that midwives experienced several barriers and facilitators in providing positive childbirth experience care to women in the Chinese context. The findings will help maternity care providers and policymakers develop multi-level implementation strategies at the individual, social, community, organization, and healthcare system levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士对促进中国妇女积极分娩经验的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:以妇女为中心的积极分娩经历护理目前是全球趋势。然而,在实践中促进妇女积极的分娩经历存在一些障碍。本研究探讨了助产士在实践中促进妇女积极分娩体验的障碍和促进因素的观点。方法:对安徽省合肥市四所三级医院产房的18名助产士进行定性半结构化访谈。我们使用主题分析对访谈进行演绎编码,并根据Dahlgren和Whitehead彩虹模型(一种健康的社会生态模型)的影响程度对调查结果进行组织。结果:助产士报告妇女积极分娩体验的障碍分为四个层面:个体因素包括心理障碍和分娩期望(微观层面),社会和社区组织因素包括人际暴力、医疗不信任和产科暴力及其结果(中观层面),医疗保健系统因素包括助产士短缺和医院环境(宏观层面)。促进积极分娩体验的因素包括产前教育、社区连续护理以及尊重和理解护理。结论:本研究表明,助产士在为中国妇女提供积极的分娩体验护理时遇到了一些障碍和促进因素。研究结果将有助于产妇保健提供者和政策制定者在个人、社会、社区、组织和医疗保健系统层面制定多层次的实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Every woman deserves that': A qualitative exploration of the impact of Australia's national maternity strategy. Intrapartum hydration assessment and management: A cross-sectional survey of Australian and New Zealand maternity units. How do midwives learn about, understand, and integrate Cultural Safety into their care of First Nations women and families? A qualitative exploration. Midwives perspectives of barriers and facilitators for the practice of promoting women's positive childbirth experience in China: A qualitative study. 'Mob aren't staying when there's no support': Enablers and barriers of recruitment and retention of First Nations midwifery students - A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1