Treatment effects of modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and rapid palatal expander for molar distalization.

Jae Hyun Park, Tae-Hyun Choi, Moon-Jung Jang, So-Yeon Kim, Nam-Ki Lee
{"title":"Treatment effects of modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and rapid palatal expander for molar distalization.","authors":"Jae Hyun Park, Tae-Hyun Choi, Moon-Jung Jang, So-Yeon Kim, Nam-Ki Lee","doi":"10.2319/042024-308.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the treatment effects of the modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and rapid palatal expander (RPE) with distalizers in patients with Class II malocclusion and maxillary crowding.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample comprised 28 skeletal Class I adolescents with dental Class II malocclusion and maxillary crowding of >4 mm who received nonextraction treatment. Fourteen patients were treated with a modified MARPE with distalizer (MMD), while another 14 patients were treated with a modified RPE with distalizer (MRD). Lateral cephalograms and study casts were taken at pretreatment (T1) and after expansion, distalization, and at the initiation of alignment (T2). Twenty-nine variables were compared using a Bonferroni-adjusted independent t-test and a Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From T1 to T2, the maxillary first molars in the MMD group exhibited distalization of 3.0 mm and 2.4 mm at the crown and root (P < .001) compared with 2.1 mm and 1.4 mm in the MRD group. However, no significant difference was found in distalization between the two groups. The first molars in the MRD group showed a significantly greater distal tipping of 2.8° than in the MMD group (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both groups showed maxillary molar distalization, the MMD group had no distal molar tipping, while there was significant molar tipping in the MRD group. It can be useful to plan nonextraction treatment with maxillary expansion and molar distalization in patients with Class II malocclusion and a narrow maxillary arch.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/042024-308.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the treatment effects of the modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and rapid palatal expander (RPE) with distalizers in patients with Class II malocclusion and maxillary crowding.

Materials and methods: The sample comprised 28 skeletal Class I adolescents with dental Class II malocclusion and maxillary crowding of >4 mm who received nonextraction treatment. Fourteen patients were treated with a modified MARPE with distalizer (MMD), while another 14 patients were treated with a modified RPE with distalizer (MRD). Lateral cephalograms and study casts were taken at pretreatment (T1) and after expansion, distalization, and at the initiation of alignment (T2). Twenty-nine variables were compared using a Bonferroni-adjusted independent t-test and a Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: From T1 to T2, the maxillary first molars in the MMD group exhibited distalization of 3.0 mm and 2.4 mm at the crown and root (P < .001) compared with 2.1 mm and 1.4 mm in the MRD group. However, no significant difference was found in distalization between the two groups. The first molars in the MRD group showed a significantly greater distal tipping of 2.8° than in the MMD group (P < .001).

Conclusions: Although both groups showed maxillary molar distalization, the MMD group had no distal molar tipping, while there was significant molar tipping in the MRD group. It can be useful to plan nonextraction treatment with maxillary expansion and molar distalization in patients with Class II malocclusion and a narrow maxillary arch.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良微型辅助快速扩腭器和快速扩腭器治疗磨牙远端的效果。
目的:评价改良微型辅助快速腭扩张器(MARPE)和快速腭扩张器(RPE)配合远化器治疗II类错颌合和上颌拥挤的疗效。材料和方法:样本包括28例骨骼I类青少年,牙齿II类错合,上颌拥挤bbbb4 mm,接受非拔牙治疗。14例患者接受改良的MARPE和扩远器(MMD)治疗,另外14例患者接受改良的RPE和扩远器(MRD)治疗。在预处理(T1)、扩张、远端和对准开始(T2)时拍摄侧位头颅造影和研究模型。29个变量采用bonferroni调整独立t检验和Mann-Whitney u检验进行比较。结果:从T1到T2, MMD组上颌第一磨牙在冠和根的远端分别为3.0 mm和2.4 mm (P < 0.001),而MRD组为2.1 mm和1.4 mm。然而,两组间远端无明显差异。MRD组第一磨牙远端倾侧度明显高于MMD组,为2.8°(P < 0.001)。结论:虽然两组均出现上颌磨牙远端,但MMD组无磨牙远端倾侧,MRD组有明显的磨牙倾侧。对于II类错牙合狭窄的上颌弓患者,规划上颌扩张和磨牙远端非拔牙治疗是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasal septum deviation after rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition. Effect of orthodontic treatment on traumatized teeth treated by regenerative endodontic procedure. Orthodontic treatment for preserving periodontally hopeless teeth in a middle-aged patient: a case report. Treatment effects of modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and rapid palatal expander for molar distalization. Anterior retraction with a canine implant in the way using clear aligner: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1