Collaborative and Distributed Bayesian Optimization via Consensus

IF 6.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1109/TASE.2025.3529349
Xubo Yue;Yang Liu;Albert S. Berahas;Blake N. Johnson;Raed Al Kontar
{"title":"Collaborative and Distributed Bayesian Optimization via Consensus","authors":"Xubo Yue;Yang Liu;Albert S. Berahas;Blake N. Johnson;Raed Al Kontar","doi":"10.1109/TASE.2025.3529349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal design is a critical yet challenging task within many applications. This challenge arises from the need for extensive trial and error, often done through simulations or running field experiments. Fortunately, sequential optimal design, also referred to as Bayesian optimization when using surrogates with a Bayesian flavor, has played a key role in accelerating the design process through efficient sequential sampling strategies. However, a key opportunity exists nowadays. The increased connectivity of edge devices sets forth a new collaborative paradigm for Bayesian optimization. A paradigm whereby different clients collaboratively borrow strength from each other by effectively distributing their experimentation efforts to improve and fast-track their optimal design process. To this end, we bring the notion of consensus to Bayesian optimization, where clients agree (i.e., reach a consensus) on their next-to-sample designs. Our approach provides a generic and flexible framework that can incorporate different collaboration mechanisms. In lieu of this, we propose transitional collaborative mechanisms where clients initially rely more on each other to maneuver through the early stages with scant data, then, at the late stages, focus on their own objectives to get client-specific solutions. Theoretically, we show the sub-linear growth in regret for our proposed framework. Empirically, through simulated datasets and a real-world collaborative sensor design experiment, we show that our framework can effectively accelerate and improve the optimal design process and benefit all participants. Note to Practitioners—The proposed algorithm allows multiple clients to collaboratively distribute their trial-and-error efforts to fast-track and improve the optimal design process. In the algorithm, each client performs a test locally and then shares the results with an orchestrator. Using the information from all clients, the orchestrator then finds the best new experiment that each client should undertake and sends those back for the next round of experiments. Through this process, all clients can leverage each other’s strengths and optimize their designs with far fewer experiments than each client operating in isolation. This is confirmed through many simulation examples, along with a real-life sensor design experiment where multiple collaborating agents seqeuntially coordinate their experimentation efforts. The goal is to rapidly discover the biosensor design and measurement format parameters that find the maximum amount of captured target analyte.","PeriodicalId":51060,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering","volume":"22 ","pages":"11343-11355"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10839380/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal design is a critical yet challenging task within many applications. This challenge arises from the need for extensive trial and error, often done through simulations or running field experiments. Fortunately, sequential optimal design, also referred to as Bayesian optimization when using surrogates with a Bayesian flavor, has played a key role in accelerating the design process through efficient sequential sampling strategies. However, a key opportunity exists nowadays. The increased connectivity of edge devices sets forth a new collaborative paradigm for Bayesian optimization. A paradigm whereby different clients collaboratively borrow strength from each other by effectively distributing their experimentation efforts to improve and fast-track their optimal design process. To this end, we bring the notion of consensus to Bayesian optimization, where clients agree (i.e., reach a consensus) on their next-to-sample designs. Our approach provides a generic and flexible framework that can incorporate different collaboration mechanisms. In lieu of this, we propose transitional collaborative mechanisms where clients initially rely more on each other to maneuver through the early stages with scant data, then, at the late stages, focus on their own objectives to get client-specific solutions. Theoretically, we show the sub-linear growth in regret for our proposed framework. Empirically, through simulated datasets and a real-world collaborative sensor design experiment, we show that our framework can effectively accelerate and improve the optimal design process and benefit all participants. Note to Practitioners—The proposed algorithm allows multiple clients to collaboratively distribute their trial-and-error efforts to fast-track and improve the optimal design process. In the algorithm, each client performs a test locally and then shares the results with an orchestrator. Using the information from all clients, the orchestrator then finds the best new experiment that each client should undertake and sends those back for the next round of experiments. Through this process, all clients can leverage each other’s strengths and optimize their designs with far fewer experiments than each client operating in isolation. This is confirmed through many simulation examples, along with a real-life sensor design experiment where multiple collaborating agents seqeuntially coordinate their experimentation efforts. The goal is to rapidly discover the biosensor design and measurement format parameters that find the maximum amount of captured target analyte.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过共识进行协作和分布式贝叶斯优化
在许多应用中,优化设计是一项关键但具有挑战性的任务。这一挑战来自于需要大量的试验和错误,通常通过模拟或运行现场实验来完成。幸运的是,顺序优化设计,也被称为贝叶斯优化,当使用具有贝叶斯风格的代理时,通过有效的顺序采样策略在加速设计过程中发挥了关键作用。然而,现在存在一个关键的机会。边缘设备连接性的增加为贝叶斯优化提出了一种新的协作范例。这是一种范例,不同的客户通过有效地分配他们的实验成果来协作,相互借鉴,以改进和快速跟踪他们的最佳设计过程。为此,我们将共识的概念引入贝叶斯优化,客户同意(即达成共识)他们的下一个样本设计。我们的方法提供了一个通用的、灵活的框架,可以合并不同的协作机制。取而代之的是,我们提出过渡性的协作机制,在这种机制中,客户最初更多地依赖彼此,在数据不足的早期阶段进行操作,然后,在后期阶段,专注于他们自己的目标,以获得特定于客户的解决方案。从理论上讲,我们提出的框架显示了遗憾的亚线性增长。通过模拟数据集和现实世界的协同传感器设计实验,我们证明了我们的框架可以有效地加速和改进优化设计过程,并使所有参与者受益。从业人员注意:所提出的算法允许多个客户协作分发他们的试错工作,以快速跟踪和改进最佳设计过程。在该算法中,每个客户机在本地执行测试,然后与编排器共享结果。使用来自所有客户端的信息,编排器然后找到每个客户端应该进行的最佳新实验,并将其发送回下一轮实验。通过这个过程,所有的客户都可以利用彼此的优势,优化他们的设计,而不是每个客户单独操作。这是通过许多模拟例子,以及一个现实生活中的传感器设计实验,其中多个协作代理依次协调他们的实验工作来证实的。目标是快速发现生物传感器设计和测量格式参数,以找到捕获的目标分析物的最大数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
404
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (T-ASE) publishes fundamental papers on Automation, emphasizing scientific results that advance efficiency, quality, productivity, and reliability. T-ASE encourages interdisciplinary approaches from computer science, control systems, electrical engineering, mathematics, mechanical engineering, operations research, and other fields. T-ASE welcomes results relevant to industries such as agriculture, biotechnology, healthcare, home automation, maintenance, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, retail, security, service, supply chains, and transportation. T-ASE addresses a research community willing to integrate knowledge across disciplines and industries. For this purpose, each paper includes a Note to Practitioners that summarizes how its results can be applied or how they might be extended to apply in practice.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Event-triggered H ∞ Control for Networked Control Systems with Stochastic Delay: An Envelope-Guided Partial Reset Approach Embedded Grating Sensing and Compensation Enabling Cross-Scale Nanopositioning Robotic Non-Contact Three-Dimensional Micromanipulation by Acoustohydrodynamic Effects SETKNet: Stochastic Event-Triggered Kalman Net with Sensor Scheduling for Remote State Estimation Important-Data-Based Attack Strategy and Resilient H ∞ Estimator Design for Autonomous Vehicle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1