Finerenone and new-onset diabetes in heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial

IF 44 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00309-7
Jawad H Butt, Pardeep S Jhund, Alasdair D Henderson, Brian L Claggett, Akshay S Desai, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Peter Kolkhof, Patrick Schloemer, Flaviana Amarante, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray
{"title":"Finerenone and new-onset diabetes in heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial","authors":"Jawad H Butt, Pardeep S Jhund, Alasdair D Henderson, Brian L Claggett, Akshay S Desai, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Peter Kolkhof, Patrick Schloemer, Flaviana Amarante, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray","doi":"10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00309-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Data on the effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy on HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels and new-onset diabetes are conflicting. We aimed to examine the effect of oral finerenone, compared with placebo, on incident diabetes in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients with Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) trial.<h3>Methods</h3>In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 6001 participants with heart failure with New York Heart Association functional class II–IV, left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or higher, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo, administered orally. Randomisation was performed with concealed allocation. The primary outcome of the trial was the composite of cardiovascular death and total (first and recurrent) heart failure events (ie, heart failure hospitalisation or urgent heart failure visit). In the present analysis, participants with diabetes at baseline (investigator-reported history of diabetes or baseline HbA<sub>1c</sub> ≥6·5%) were excluded. New-onset diabetes was defined as a HbA<sub>1c</sub> measurement of 6·5% or higher on two consecutive follow-up visits or new initiation of glucose-lowering therapy. The full-analysis set comprised all participants randomly assigned to study treatment, analysed according to their treatment assignment irrespective of the treatment received (ie, intention to treat). The safety analysis set comprised participants randomly assigned to study treatment who took at least one dose of the investigational product, analysed according to the treatment actually received. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04435626</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is closed to new participants.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Sept 14, 2020, and Jan 10, 2023, 6001 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo. 3222 (53·7%) participants did not have diabetes at baseline and comprised the study population. During a median duration of follow-up of 31·3 months (IQR 21·5–36·3), 115 (7·2%) participants in the finerenone group and 147 (9·1%) in the placebo group developed new-onset diabetes, corresponding to a rate of 3·0 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 2·5–3·6) in the finerenone group and 3·9 events per 100 person-years (3·3–4·6) in the placebo group. Compared with placebo, finerenone significantly reduced the hazard of new-onset diabetes by 24% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·59–0·97], p=0·026). Fine–Gray competing risk analysis, accounting for the competing risk of death, yielded a similar finding (subdistribution HR 0·75 [0·59–0·96], p=0·024). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses, in which the definition of new-onset diabetes was expanded to include initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment with diabetes as indication, restricted to HbA<sub>1c</sub> measurements only, and restricted to new initiation of glucose-lowering drugs only (excluding SGLT2 inhibitor treatment). Findings were similar when participants treated with glucose-lowering drugs at baseline were excluded (n=15). The effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, on new-onset diabetes was consistent across key participant subgroups. Seven participants had an adverse event of new diabetes not captured by any of the definitions above.<h3>Interpretation</h3>In participants with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction without diabetes, oral finerenone reduced the hazard of new-onset diabetes, representing a meaningful additional clinical benefit of this treatment in these individuals.<h3>Funding</h3>Bayer.","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00309-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Data on the effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy on HbA1c levels and new-onset diabetes are conflicting. We aimed to examine the effect of oral finerenone, compared with placebo, on incident diabetes in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients with Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) trial.

Methods

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 6001 participants with heart failure with New York Heart Association functional class II–IV, left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or higher, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo, administered orally. Randomisation was performed with concealed allocation. The primary outcome of the trial was the composite of cardiovascular death and total (first and recurrent) heart failure events (ie, heart failure hospitalisation or urgent heart failure visit). In the present analysis, participants with diabetes at baseline (investigator-reported history of diabetes or baseline HbA1c ≥6·5%) were excluded. New-onset diabetes was defined as a HbA1c measurement of 6·5% or higher on two consecutive follow-up visits or new initiation of glucose-lowering therapy. The full-analysis set comprised all participants randomly assigned to study treatment, analysed according to their treatment assignment irrespective of the treatment received (ie, intention to treat). The safety analysis set comprised participants randomly assigned to study treatment who took at least one dose of the investigational product, analysed according to the treatment actually received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04435626, and is closed to new participants.

Findings

Between Sept 14, 2020, and Jan 10, 2023, 6001 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo. 3222 (53·7%) participants did not have diabetes at baseline and comprised the study population. During a median duration of follow-up of 31·3 months (IQR 21·5–36·3), 115 (7·2%) participants in the finerenone group and 147 (9·1%) in the placebo group developed new-onset diabetes, corresponding to a rate of 3·0 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 2·5–3·6) in the finerenone group and 3·9 events per 100 person-years (3·3–4·6) in the placebo group. Compared with placebo, finerenone significantly reduced the hazard of new-onset diabetes by 24% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·59–0·97], p=0·026). Fine–Gray competing risk analysis, accounting for the competing risk of death, yielded a similar finding (subdistribution HR 0·75 [0·59–0·96], p=0·024). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses, in which the definition of new-onset diabetes was expanded to include initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment with diabetes as indication, restricted to HbA1c measurements only, and restricted to new initiation of glucose-lowering drugs only (excluding SGLT2 inhibitor treatment). Findings were similar when participants treated with glucose-lowering drugs at baseline were excluded (n=15). The effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, on new-onset diabetes was consistent across key participant subgroups. Seven participants had an adverse event of new diabetes not captured by any of the definitions above.

Interpretation

In participants with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction without diabetes, oral finerenone reduced the hazard of new-onset diabetes, representing a meaningful additional clinical benefit of this treatment in these individuals.

Funding

Bayer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬纳酮和心力衰竭新发糖尿病:fineards - hf试验的预先分析
背景有关矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗对 HbA1c 水平和新发糖尿病影响的数据相互矛盾。我们的目的是在 "心力衰竭患者非格列酮疗效和安全性优于安慰剂试验"(FINEARTS-HF)中研究口服非格列酮(与安慰剂相比)对糖尿病发病的影响。方法在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,6001名患有纽约心脏病协会功能分级II-IV级、左心室射血分数40%或更高、有结构性心脏病证据和N末端前B型利钠肽水平升高的心力衰竭患者被随机分配到非奈酮或安慰剂中,口服给药。随机分配以隐藏方式进行。试验的主要结果是心血管死亡和全部(首次和复发)心力衰竭事件(即心力衰竭住院或心力衰竭急诊)的复合结果。在本分析中,基线时患有糖尿病(研究者报告的糖尿病史或基线 HbA1c ≥6-5%)的参与者被排除在外。新发糖尿病的定义是连续两次随访时 HbA1c 测量值达到或超过 6-5%,或新开始接受降糖治疗。全面分析集包括随机分配接受研究治疗的所有参与者,根据他们的治疗分配进行分析,与接受的治疗无关(即意向治疗)。安全性分析集包括随机分配接受研究治疗且至少服用过一次研究产品剂量的参与者,根据实际接受的治疗进行分析。研究结果在2020年9月14日至2023年1月10日期间,共招募了6001名参与者,并随机分配他们接受非格列酮或安慰剂治疗。3222名参与者(53-7%)在基线时未患有糖尿病,他们构成了研究人群。在中位随访期31-3个月(IQR 21-5-36-3)期间,非格列酮组和安慰剂组分别有115人(7-2%)和147人(9-1%)罹患新发糖尿病,即非格列酮组每百人年3-0例(95% CI 2-5-3-6),安慰剂组每百人年3-9例(3-3-4-6)。与安慰剂相比,非格列酮能显著降低24%的新发糖尿病风险(危险比[HR] 0-76 [95% CI 0-59-0-97],P=0-026)。考虑到死亡竞争风险的 Fine-Gray 竞争风险分析也得出了类似的结果(子分布 HR 0-75 [0-59-0-96],P=0-024)。敏感性分析的结果相似,在敏感性分析中,新发糖尿病的定义扩大到包括以糖尿病为指征开始SGLT2抑制剂治疗、仅限于HbA1c测量结果,以及仅限于新开始使用降糖药物(不包括SGLT2抑制剂治疗)。如果排除基线接受降糖药物治疗的参与者(n=15),结果也类似。与安慰剂相比,非格列酮对新发糖尿病的影响在主要参与者亚组中是一致的。在射血分数轻度减低或保留而无糖尿病的心力衰竭患者中,口服非格列酮能降低新发糖尿病的风险,这表明这种治疗方法对这些患者具有有意义的额外临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
61.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, features original clinical research, expert reviews, news, and opinion pieces in each monthly issue. Covering topics like diabetes, obesity, nutrition, and more, the journal provides insights into clinical advances and practice-changing research worldwide. It welcomes original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice, as well as informative reviews on related topics, especially those with global health importance and relevance to low-income and middle-income countries. The journal publishes various content types, including Articles, Reviews, Comments, Correspondence, Health Policy, and Personal Views, along with Series and Commissions aiming to drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in diabetes and endocrinology.
期刊最新文献
Trends in thyroid cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in the USA Trends in incidence, metastasis, and mortality from thyroid cancer in the USA from 1975 to 2019: a population-based study of age, period, and cohort effects Correction to Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2025; 13: 119–33 Automated insulin delivery postpartum: insights from the AiDAPT study extension Automated insulin delivery during the first 6 months postpartum (AiDAPT): a prespecified extension study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1