Testing and improving brGMGTs-based paleotemperature estimates in peat sediments: Evidence from global surface peat samples and two well-dated Holocene peat cores in far Northwest China

IF 4 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Global and Planetary Change Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104700
Zhongwei Shen, Minghua Zhao, Tianyan Lin, Xiaoxu Qu, Haichun Guo, Jiantao Cao, Guodong Jia, Zhiguo Rao
{"title":"Testing and improving brGMGTs-based paleotemperature estimates in peat sediments: Evidence from global surface peat samples and two well-dated Holocene peat cores in far Northwest China","authors":"Zhongwei Shen, Minghua Zhao, Tianyan Lin, Xiaoxu Qu, Haichun Guo, Jiantao Cao, Guodong Jia, Zhiguo Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BrGMGTs (branched glycerol monoalkyl glycerol tetraethers) are proposed as potential proxies for temperature estimation due to their constrained and consistent biological origin. However, discrepancies observed between brGMGTs-based proxies and MAAT (mean annual air temperature) have raised concerns about their applicability. Here, we analyzed surface samples from three peatlands across China, and two well-dated Holocene peat cores. We found: 1) surface peat samples showed that %brGMGTs (abundance of brGMGTs relative to brGMGTs and brGDGTs; brGDGTs: branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers) and H-MBT (methylation degree of brGMGTs) were ineffective to represent temperature. 2) Holocene records of %brGMGTs and H-MBT were uncorrelated with MBT’<ce:inf loc=\"post\">5ME</ce:inf> records (previously established as reliable temperature records) in the same cores, as well as with regional other proxy temperature records. Our data, along with the global peat dataset, indicated that brGMGTs are ineffective for temperature estimation under cold conditions (MAAT &lt;10 °C). This ineffectiveness may be due to unfavorable temperature niches, changes in aerobic/anaerobic conditions and microbial communities. By setting a threshold (%brGMGTs &gt;4 %), we found that H-MBT showed a higher positive correlation with MAAT (<ce:italic>R</ce:italic><ce:sup loc=\"post\"><ce:italic>2</ce:italic></ce:sup> = 0.50, <ce:italic>p</ce:italic> &lt; 0.01, <ce:italic>n</ce:italic> = 26), compared to all samples (<ce:italic>R</ce:italic><ce:sup loc=\"post\"><ce:italic>2</ce:italic></ce:sup> = 0.47, <ce:italic>p</ce:italic> &lt; 0.01, <ce:italic>n</ce:italic> = 72). Although this improvement in correlation is modest, it helps exclude samples with MAAT &lt;10 °C. Our revised method for temperature estimation using brGMGTs could potentially be applied to peat sediments with MAAT ranging from 10 °C to 27 °C, enhancing their application for paleotemperature reconstruction in future research.","PeriodicalId":55089,"journal":{"name":"Global and Planetary Change","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Planetary Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104700","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BrGMGTs (branched glycerol monoalkyl glycerol tetraethers) are proposed as potential proxies for temperature estimation due to their constrained and consistent biological origin. However, discrepancies observed between brGMGTs-based proxies and MAAT (mean annual air temperature) have raised concerns about their applicability. Here, we analyzed surface samples from three peatlands across China, and two well-dated Holocene peat cores. We found: 1) surface peat samples showed that %brGMGTs (abundance of brGMGTs relative to brGMGTs and brGDGTs; brGDGTs: branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers) and H-MBT (methylation degree of brGMGTs) were ineffective to represent temperature. 2) Holocene records of %brGMGTs and H-MBT were uncorrelated with MBT’5ME records (previously established as reliable temperature records) in the same cores, as well as with regional other proxy temperature records. Our data, along with the global peat dataset, indicated that brGMGTs are ineffective for temperature estimation under cold conditions (MAAT <10 °C). This ineffectiveness may be due to unfavorable temperature niches, changes in aerobic/anaerobic conditions and microbial communities. By setting a threshold (%brGMGTs >4 %), we found that H-MBT showed a higher positive correlation with MAAT (R2 = 0.50, p < 0.01, n = 26), compared to all samples (R2 = 0.47, p < 0.01, n = 72). Although this improvement in correlation is modest, it helps exclude samples with MAAT <10 °C. Our revised method for temperature estimation using brGMGTs could potentially be applied to peat sediments with MAAT ranging from 10 °C to 27 °C, enhancing their application for paleotemperature reconstruction in future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于brgmgts的泥炭沉积物古温度估算的检验与改进:来自全球地表泥炭样品和中国西北远地区两个全新世泥炭岩心的证据
BrGMGTs(支链甘油单烷基甘油四醚)由于其受约束和一致的生物来源而被提出作为温度估计的潜在代理。然而,基于brgmgts的代用物与MAAT(年平均气温)之间观测到的差异引起了人们对其适用性的担忧。在这里,我们分析了来自中国三个泥炭地的地表样本,以及两个年代确定的全新世泥炭岩心。结果表明:1)表层泥炭样品中brGMGTs(相对于brGMGTs和brGMGTs的丰度)%;brGMGTs:支化甘油二烷基甘油四醚)和H-MBT (brGMGTs的甲基化程度)不能代表温度。2)全新世的% brgmgt和H-MBT记录与同一岩心的MBT’5ME记录(以前建立的可靠温度记录)以及区域其他代理温度记录不相关。我们的数据以及全球泥炭数据表明,在寒冷条件下(MAAT <10°C), brGMGTs对温度估计无效。这种无效可能是由于不利的温度生态位,好氧/厌氧条件和微生物群落的变化。通过设置阈值(%brGMGTs > 4%),我们发现H-MBT与MAAT有较高的正相关(R2 = 0.50, p <;0.01, n = 26),与所有样本相比(R2 = 0.47, p <;0.01, n = 72)。虽然这种相关性的改善是适度的,但它有助于排除MAAT <;10°C的样品。修正后的brGMGTs温度估算方法可应用于MAAT范围为10 ~ 27℃的泥炭沉积物,增强了其在未来研究中古温度重建的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global and Planetary Change
Global and Planetary Change 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal Global and Planetary Change is to provide a multi-disciplinary overview of the processes taking place in the Earth System and involved in planetary change over time. The journal focuses on records of the past and current state of the earth system, and future scenarios , and their link to global environmental change. Regional or process-oriented studies are welcome if they discuss global implications. Topics include, but are not limited to, changes in the dynamics and composition of the atmosphere, oceans and cryosphere, as well as climate change, sea level variation, observations/modelling of Earth processes from deep to (near-)surface and their coupling, global ecology, biogeography and the resilience/thresholds in ecosystems. Key criteria for the consideration of manuscripts are (a) the relevance for the global scientific community and/or (b) the wider implications for global scale problems, preferably combined with (c) having a significance beyond a single discipline. A clear focus on key processes associated with planetary scale change is strongly encouraged. Manuscripts can be submitted as either research contributions or as a review article. Every effort should be made towards the presentation of research outcomes in an understandable way for a broad readership.
期刊最新文献
Gallium behavior and isotopic compositions in marine siliceous sediments from the southern Mariana Trench Population migration with improved productivity caused a heterogeneity pattern of Holocene vegetation succession in typical areas of the lower Yangtze region Flood occurrences and characteristics in Poland (Central Europe) in the last millennium Using seasonal palaeo-flow reconstructions and artificial neural networks for daily water balance modelling: A case study from Tasmania, Australia Enhanced human activities have disturbed the vegetation-climate relationship over the last millennium in the Changbai Mountains, north-east China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1