Association between Deficient MSH2/MSH6 vs MLH1/PMS2 Status and Survival Rates in Localized Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006628
Tobias Freyberg Justesen, Adile Orhan, Andreas Weinberger Rosen, Mikail Gögenur, Peter-Martin Krarup, Camilla Qvortrup, Ismail Gögenur
{"title":"Association between Deficient MSH2/MSH6 vs MLH1/PMS2 Status and Survival Rates in Localized Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Tobias Freyberg Justesen, Adile Orhan, Andreas Weinberger Rosen, Mikail Gögenur, Peter-Martin Krarup, Camilla Qvortrup, Ismail Gögenur","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the association between loss of MSH2/MSH6 versus loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression and overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with localized colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of developing colorectal cancer varies depending on the expression of mismatch repair proteins. However, it is unknown if the prognosis differs accordingly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we included a Danish cohort of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between 2009 and 2020. The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database was used to identify patients, and patient-level data were extracted from six registries. Subsequently, patients with proficient mismatch repair status, with metastatic disease, who underwent emergency surgery, or who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Patients were then propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,625 patients with localized deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer were included in the study. Patients had a median age of 75 years and a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Before matching, the MSH2/MSH6 versus MLH1/PMS2 groups differed in age, gender, and comorbidities. After matching, 556 patients were included and loss of MSH2/MSH6 was significantly associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94); however, not disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with localized deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer who underwent surgery, a significant association was found between loss of MSH2/MSH6 versus loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression and overall survival. Thus, these patients may be a target for a differentiated follow-up strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the association between loss of MSH2/MSH6 versus loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression and overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with localized colorectal cancer.

Background: The risk of developing colorectal cancer varies depending on the expression of mismatch repair proteins. However, it is unknown if the prognosis differs accordingly.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we included a Danish cohort of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between 2009 and 2020. The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database was used to identify patients, and patient-level data were extracted from six registries. Subsequently, patients with proficient mismatch repair status, with metastatic disease, who underwent emergency surgery, or who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Patients were then propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio.

Results: A total of 3,625 patients with localized deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer were included in the study. Patients had a median age of 75 years and a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Before matching, the MSH2/MSH6 versus MLH1/PMS2 groups differed in age, gender, and comorbidities. After matching, 556 patients were included and loss of MSH2/MSH6 was significantly associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94); however, not disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.30).

Conclusions: In patients with localized deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer who underwent surgery, a significant association was found between loss of MSH2/MSH6 versus loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression and overall survival. Thus, these patients may be a target for a differentiated follow-up strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部结直肠癌中MSH2/MSH6缺陷与MLH1/PMS2状态和生存率的关系:一项全国性队列研究
目的:本研究探讨局部结直肠癌患者MSH2/MSH6表达缺失与MLH1/PMS2表达缺失与总生存期和无病生存期之间的关系。背景:发生结直肠癌的风险取决于错配修复蛋白的表达。然而,目前尚不清楚预后是否相应不同。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了2009年至2020年期间接受结直肠癌手术的丹麦患者队列。使用丹麦结直肠癌组数据库来识别患者,并从六个登记处提取患者水平的数据。随后,排除了具有熟练错配修复状态、有转移性疾病、接受紧急手术或接受新辅助治疗的患者。然后以1:1的比例对患者进行倾向评分匹配。结果:共纳入3625例局部缺陷错配修复型结直肠癌患者。患者的中位年龄为75岁,中位随访时间为4.3年。配对前,MSH2/MSH6组与MLH1/PMS2组在年龄、性别和合并症方面存在差异。匹配后,纳入556例患者,MSH2/MSH6缺失与更好的总生存显著相关(风险比0.60;95% ci, 0.37-0.94);然而,无病生存期(风险比0.84;95% ci, 0.54-1.30)。结论:在接受手术的局部缺陷错配修复型结直肠癌患者中,发现MSH2/MSH6表达缺失与MLH1/PMS2表达缺失与总生存率之间存在显著关联。因此,这些患者可能是差异化随访策略的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients with Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis from Alliance A231701CD). International Medical Graduates in Academic Cardiothoracic Surgery. Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Prevalence and Incidence of Oral Benzodiazepine Use in Hospitalized Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Future of Robotic Surgery and the Path Forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1