Pharmacogenomics and symptom management in palliative and supportive care: A scoping review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-005205
Caroline Barry, Martyn Patel
{"title":"Pharmacogenomics and symptom management in palliative and supportive care: A scoping review.","authors":"Caroline Barry, Martyn Patel","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an area of expanding research, which could indicate whether an individual is likely to benefit from a symptom control medication. Palliative and supportive care (PSC) could be an area that benefits from PGx, however, little is known about the current evidence base for this.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine how PGx can be applied in PSC, whether there is any evidence of benefit, and to understand the extent and type of evidence that supports the use of PGx in PSC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of six databases up to July 2024. Reference snowballing from review articles and screened papers was used to identify any missed articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 articles were reviewed. A total of 550 patients had a PGx test across 8/11 studies. Up to half of the patients had an actionable PGx result, and in one study there were 4.6 drug-gene interactions per patient. Implementation of PGx was found to be feasible. Clinician adherence to advice given was under-reported. No studies reported health economics analysis, or was designed to definitively answer whether PGx was better than standard care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is both feasible and acceptable to conduct PGx testing in a supportive and palliative care setting. Many supportive care medications are amenable to PGx. Clinician adherence to recommendations is variable and there is no clear evidence that PGx enhances palliative/supportive care patient outcomes. Prospective, clinical trials are needed to establish whether PGx can improve symptom management for people receiving PSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an area of expanding research, which could indicate whether an individual is likely to benefit from a symptom control medication. Palliative and supportive care (PSC) could be an area that benefits from PGx, however, little is known about the current evidence base for this.

Objective: To determine how PGx can be applied in PSC, whether there is any evidence of benefit, and to understand the extent and type of evidence that supports the use of PGx in PSC.

Methods: A search of six databases up to July 2024. Reference snowballing from review articles and screened papers was used to identify any missed articles.

Results: 11 articles were reviewed. A total of 550 patients had a PGx test across 8/11 studies. Up to half of the patients had an actionable PGx result, and in one study there were 4.6 drug-gene interactions per patient. Implementation of PGx was found to be feasible. Clinician adherence to advice given was under-reported. No studies reported health economics analysis, or was designed to definitively answer whether PGx was better than standard care.

Conclusions: It is both feasible and acceptable to conduct PGx testing in a supportive and palliative care setting. Many supportive care medications are amenable to PGx. Clinician adherence to recommendations is variable and there is no clear evidence that PGx enhances palliative/supportive care patient outcomes. Prospective, clinical trials are needed to establish whether PGx can improve symptom management for people receiving PSC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息治疗和支持性治疗中的药物基因组学和症状管理:范围综述。
背景:药物基因组学(PGx)是一个不断扩大的研究领域,它可以表明一个人是否可能从症状控制药物中受益。姑息治疗和支持性治疗(PSC)可能是一个受益于PGx的领域,然而,目前对这方面的证据基础知之甚少。目的:确定PGx如何应用于PSC,是否有任何有益的证据,并了解支持PGx在PSC中使用的证据的程度和类型。方法:检索截至2024年7月的6个数据库。参考文献滚雪球从综述文章和筛选论文被用来确定任何遗漏的文章。结果:共纳入11篇文献。在8/11研究中,共有550名患者进行了PGx检测。多达一半的患者有可操作的PGx结果,在一项研究中,每个患者有4.6个药物基因相互作用。发现PGx的实施是可行的。临床医生对建议的依从性被低估。没有研究报告健康经济学分析,也没有设计明确回答PGx是否优于标准护理。结论:在支持和姑息治疗环境中进行PGx检测是可行和可接受的。许多支持性护理药物都适用于PGx。临床医生对建议的依从性是可变的,没有明确的证据表明PGx可以提高患者的姑息治疗/支持性治疗结果。需要前瞻性的临床试验来确定PGx是否可以改善PSC患者的症状管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Resilience-building in palliative care professionals: scoping review. Muscle metric: re-evaluating prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer. Assessment of blended learning palliative care educational programme in cancer treatment centres in India. Rational use of human albumin: plan-do-check-act cycle in clinical practice. Symptom and problem burden, performance status and palliative care phases in specialist palliative care: cross-sectional analysis of care episodes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1