Refining PREVENT prediction models for 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease using measures of anxiety and depression.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Canadian Medical Association journal Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1503/cmaj.240996
Shinya Nakada, Paul Welsh, Carlos Celis-Morales, Jill P Pell, Frederick K Ho
{"title":"Refining PREVENT prediction models for 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease using measures of anxiety and depression.","authors":"Shinya Nakada, Paul Welsh, Carlos Celis-Morales, Jill P Pell, Frederick K Ho","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.240996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety and depression are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to investigate whether adding measures of anxiety and depression to the American Heart Association Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) predictors improves the prediction of CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and internally validated risk prediction models using 60% and 40% of the cohort data from the UK Biobank, respectively. Mental health predictors included baseline depressive symptom score and self-reported and record-based history of anxiety and depression diagnoses before the baseline. We identified CVD events using hospital admission and death certificate data over a 10-year period from baseline. We determined incremental predictive values by adding the mental health predictors to the PREVENT predictors using Harrell's C-indices, sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification improvement indices. We used a threshold of 10-year risk of incident CVD of greater than 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 502 366 UK Biobank participants, we included 195 489 in the derivation set and 130 326 in the validation set. In the validation set, the inclusion of all mental health measures, except self-reported anxiety, produced a very modest increase in the C-index and specificity while sensitivity remained unchanged. Among these mental health predictors, depressive symptom score produced the greatest improvements in both C-index (difference of 0.005, 95% confidence interval 0.004-0.006) and specificity (difference of 0.89%). Depressive symptom score showed similar small improvements in female and male validation sets.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings suggest that the inclusion of measures of depression and anxiety in PREVENT would have little additional effect on the risk classification of CVD at the population level and may not be worthwhile.</p>","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":"197 1","pages":"E1-E8"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.240996","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety and depression are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to investigate whether adding measures of anxiety and depression to the American Heart Association Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) predictors improves the prediction of CVD risk.

Methods: We developed and internally validated risk prediction models using 60% and 40% of the cohort data from the UK Biobank, respectively. Mental health predictors included baseline depressive symptom score and self-reported and record-based history of anxiety and depression diagnoses before the baseline. We identified CVD events using hospital admission and death certificate data over a 10-year period from baseline. We determined incremental predictive values by adding the mental health predictors to the PREVENT predictors using Harrell's C-indices, sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification improvement indices. We used a threshold of 10-year risk of incident CVD of greater than 5%.

Results: Of the 502 366 UK Biobank participants, we included 195 489 in the derivation set and 130 326 in the validation set. In the validation set, the inclusion of all mental health measures, except self-reported anxiety, produced a very modest increase in the C-index and specificity while sensitivity remained unchanged. Among these mental health predictors, depressive symptom score produced the greatest improvements in both C-index (difference of 0.005, 95% confidence interval 0.004-0.006) and specificity (difference of 0.89%). Depressive symptom score showed similar small improvements in female and male validation sets.

Interpretation: Our findings suggest that the inclusion of measures of depression and anxiety in PREVENT would have little additional effect on the risk classification of CVD at the population level and may not be worthwhile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用焦虑和抑郁的测量方法改进预防10年心血管疾病风险的预测模型。
背景:焦虑和抑郁与心血管疾病(CVD)有关:焦虑和抑郁与心血管疾病(CVD)有关。我们的目的是研究在美国心脏协会心血管疾病事件风险预测(PREVENT)预测指标中加入焦虑和抑郁指标是否能改善心血管疾病风险预测:我们分别利用英国生物库 60% 和 40% 的队列数据开发了风险预测模型,并进行了内部验证。心理健康预测因子包括基线抑郁症状评分、基线前焦虑和抑郁诊断的自我报告和记录历史。我们利用自基线起 10 年内的入院和死亡证明数据来确定心血管疾病事件。我们使用哈雷尔 C 指数、灵敏度、特异性和净再分类改善指数,将心理健康预测因子添加到 PREVENT 预测因子中,从而确定增量预测值。我们使用的阈值是 10 年心血管疾病发病风险大于 5%:在 502 366 名英国生物库参与者中,我们将 195 489 人纳入推导集,将 130 326 人纳入验证集。在验证集中,除自我报告的焦虑外,纳入所有心理健康指标都会使 C 指数和特异性略有增加,而灵敏度则保持不变。在这些心理健康预测因子中,抑郁症状评分对 C 指数(差异为 0.005,95% 置信区间为 0.004-0.006)和特异性(差异为 0.89%)的改善最大。抑郁症状评分在女性和男性验证组中也有类似的小幅改善:我们的研究结果表明,在 PREVENT 中纳入抑郁和焦虑的测量指标对人群心血管疾病的风险分类几乎没有额外的影响,因此可能不值得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
期刊最新文献
Adult-onset Still disease. Correction to "Nomenclature revision may mitigate potential overtreatment of incidental finding of coronary calcium on chest computed tomography". Diagnosis and management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Everything but love. Indicateurs pour l’évaluation de l’interopérabilité des données sur la santé au Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1