Examining Changes in Pain Sensitivity Following 8 Minutes of Cycling at Varying Exercise Intensities.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.70252/NIZK5519
Brandi B Antonio, Jeffrey R Stout, Danielle A Sterner, David H Fukuda, Abigail W Anderson
{"title":"Examining Changes in Pain Sensitivity Following 8 Minutes of Cycling at Varying Exercise Intensities.","authors":"Brandi B Antonio, Jeffrey R Stout, Danielle A Sterner, David H Fukuda, Abigail W Anderson","doi":"10.70252/NIZK5519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the effect of an eight-minute cycling intervention using varying intensities on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH). The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of varying intensities on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and heat pain threshold (HPT) at the thigh and forearm, tested pre- and post-cycling intervention. Healthy male participants (<i>n</i> = 16) performed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer to establish their peak power output (PPO). In subsequent visits, participants completed five different 8-minute cycling interventions, with intensities randomly assigned to one of three counterbalanced orders. HPT and PPT were applied to the thigh and forearm two times before and after each cycling intervention. Additionally, there was a notable effect of intensity on PPT in the thigh, with significant changes at intensities of 90% (<i>p</i> = 0.024) and 100% PPO (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In the forearm, repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there was no significant interaction or main effect for intensity and time. Similarly, for HPT, the analysis did not show significant interaction or main effects for both intensity and location. This study was the first to examine EIH using an 8-minute cycling intervention on a cycling ergometer at individualized intensities. Higher intensity cycling sessions generated EIH locally in the thigh using PPT. A short but high intensity cycling intervention may have clinical relevance, as it can provide an intervention to reduce localized pain immediately after exercise using a pressure pain stimulus.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 7","pages":"1337-1351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/NIZK5519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of an eight-minute cycling intervention using varying intensities on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH). The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of varying intensities on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and heat pain threshold (HPT) at the thigh and forearm, tested pre- and post-cycling intervention. Healthy male participants (n = 16) performed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer to establish their peak power output (PPO). In subsequent visits, participants completed five different 8-minute cycling interventions, with intensities randomly assigned to one of three counterbalanced orders. HPT and PPT were applied to the thigh and forearm two times before and after each cycling intervention. Additionally, there was a notable effect of intensity on PPT in the thigh, with significant changes at intensities of 90% (p = 0.024) and 100% PPO (p = 0.003). In the forearm, repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there was no significant interaction or main effect for intensity and time. Similarly, for HPT, the analysis did not show significant interaction or main effects for both intensity and location. This study was the first to examine EIH using an 8-minute cycling intervention on a cycling ergometer at individualized intensities. Higher intensity cycling sessions generated EIH locally in the thigh using PPT. A short but high intensity cycling intervention may have clinical relevance, as it can provide an intervention to reduce localized pain immediately after exercise using a pressure pain stimulus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究不同运动强度的 8 分钟自行车运动后疼痛敏感性的变化。
本研究评估了不同强度的8分钟循环干预对运动性痛觉减退(EIH)的影响。本研究的主要目的是研究不同强度对大腿和前臂压力痛阈值(PPT)和热痛阈值(HPT)的影响,在循环干预前和后进行测试。健康男性参与者(n = 16)在循环计力器上进行了分级运动测试,以确定他们的峰值功率输出(PPO)。在随后的访问中,参与者完成了五种不同的8分钟骑行干预,强度随机分配到三种平衡顺序中的一种。每次循环干预前后,分别在大腿和前臂涂抹HPT和PPT 2次。此外,强度对大腿部位PPT有显著影响,在90% PPO (p = 0.024)和100% PPO (p = 0.003)强度下有显著变化。在前臂,重复测量方差分析表明,在强度和时间上没有显著的相互作用或主效应。同样,对于HPT,分析没有显示出强度和位置的显著相互作用或主要影响。这项研究首次在个性化强度的自行车计力器上使用8分钟的自行车干预来检查EIH。高强度的自行车运动使用PPT在大腿局部产生EIH。短期但高强度的循环干预可能具有临床意义,因为它可以提供干预,在使用压力疼痛刺激运动后立即减少局部疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Exercise Dependence Among High-Intensity Functional Training Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. The Psychometric Performance of State Mindfulness Scales Around Sitting and Walking on Desert Trails: A Pilot Study. Yoga vs. Static Stretching: Recovery Impact on Male Athletes' Post-HIIT Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, and Heart Rate Variability Analysis. Longitudinal Analysis of Subsequent Musculoskeletal Injuries and Predictive Value of Index Injuries in Collegiate Women's Field Hockey. Observing the Relationship Between Additional Measures of Handgrip Strength and the 6-Minute Push Test in Ambulatory Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1